Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
- ponchi101
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16718
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
- Location: New Macondo
- Has thanked: 4239 times
- Been thanked: 6647 times
- Contact:
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
I, on the other hand, did not know they got so much they ahd to give it away.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
-
- Posts: 1978
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:00 am
- Location: Smiths Falls
- Has thanked: 1575 times
- Been thanked: 1191 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
I think this happened a while ago, but this thread has really moved away from it's intended purpose.
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Thanks! So I wasn’t the only one who was curious! Another journalist actually gave me (expletive) for this idea, thinking it was dull. But I have always wanted to know.ashkor87 wrote:https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/wh ... ill-stores
Lovely article by @meganfernandez
I have often wondered..but the range of solutions is interesting
I have to add some info that came in later from Nicole Melichar-Martinez. She says Slams have had donation boxes in the past I’ve only been able to confirm that the U.S. Open has had shoe drops. That’s it. Takes a lot of time to track down those details and it’s infeasible to find out from other Slams.
Thanks for reading and sharing!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Good, because I always hated the original intention.skatingfan wrote:I think this happened a while ago, but this thread has really moved away from it's intended purpose.
We need a thread for not-terrible journalism. Or does that go in Tennis Random, Random.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- ponchi101
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16718
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
- Location: New Macondo
- Has thanked: 4239 times
- Been thanked: 6647 times
- Contact:
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
I hated the fact that the original intention was there because there were so many suchc articles. Articles about Serena with pictures of Venus, or about a given player with a picture of another, improper stats, poorly researched and such.
I know you are a journalist but your articles are clearly well researched and written. But when, for example, somebody writes an article and quotes "Jimmy CONNERS", it made my head hurt.
And remember. This is not a dictatorship. You can post articles in any topic; even if it is a bit confusing at times.
I know you are a journalist but your articles are clearly well researched and written. But when, for example, somebody writes an article and quotes "Jimmy CONNERS", it made my head hurt.
And remember. This is not a dictatorship. You can post articles in any topic; even if it is a bit confusing at times.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
- ponchi101
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16718
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
- Location: New Macondo
- Has thanked: 4239 times
- Been thanked: 6647 times
- Contact:
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Here's an example.
This is the article's headline: Sounds like Rafa called somebody stupid.
This is the actual statement, from within the same article:
Meanwhile, Nadal was irked by Tsitsipas ahead of his second-round match against De Minaur in Barcelona after the Greek star said he wouldn’t be surprised to see the ‘King of Clay’ reach the final of the ATP 500 event.
‘It’s stupid, let’s face it, he knows that’s not the case,’ Nadal said, according to Spanish outlet Punto de Break.
‘I suppose there is a lot of respect for what I have [done] in this tournament, but everyone knows that I am no longer a favourite to aspire to win a tournament.
Neither was Nadal irked, nor was he calling anybody stupid.
But I guess the headline draws more clicks than "Nadal calls Tsitsipas opinion stupid".
This is the article's headline: Sounds like Rafa called somebody stupid.
This is the actual statement, from within the same article:
Meanwhile, Nadal was irked by Tsitsipas ahead of his second-round match against De Minaur in Barcelona after the Greek star said he wouldn’t be surprised to see the ‘King of Clay’ reach the final of the ATP 500 event.
‘It’s stupid, let’s face it, he knows that’s not the case,’ Nadal said, according to Spanish outlet Punto de Break.
‘I suppose there is a lot of respect for what I have [done] in this tournament, but everyone knows that I am no longer a favourite to aspire to win a tournament.
Neither was Nadal irked, nor was he calling anybody stupid.
But I guess the headline draws more clicks than "Nadal calls Tsitsipas opinion stupid".
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
-
- Posts: 6034
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
- Location: India
- Has thanked: 3204 times
- Been thanked: 1046 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
This is your fault ! If you didn't write so many good articles, we could have continued the old way!meganfernandez wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:58 pmGood, because I always hated the original intention.skatingfan wrote:I think this happened a while ago, but this thread has really moved away from it's intended purpose.
We need a thread for not-terrible journalism. Or does that go in Tennis Random, Random.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Burying this thread has been my primary career motivation.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:32 amThis is your fault ! If you didn't write so many good articles, we could have continued the old way!meganfernandez wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:58 pmGood, because I always hated the original intention.skatingfan wrote:I think this happened a while ago, but this thread has really moved away from it's intended purpose.
We need a thread for not-terrible journalism. Or does that go in Tennis Random, Random.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
You are spot-on but that's actually a much more sophisticated criticism than what this thread usually traffics in. That's more substance editing than a silly mistake or a bot pulling the wrong photo because the metadata was wrong.ponchi101 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:33 pm Here's an example.
This is the article's headline:
Article.jpg
Sounds like Rafa called somebody stupid.
This is the actual statement, from within the same article:
Meanwhile, Nadal was irked by Tsitsipas ahead of his second-round match against De Minaur in Barcelona after the Greek star said he wouldn’t be surprised to see the ‘King of Clay’ reach the final of the ATP 500 event.
‘It’s stupid, let’s face it, he knows that’s not the case,’ Nadal said, according to Spanish outlet Punto de Break.
‘I suppose there is a lot of respect for what I have [done] in this tournament, but everyone knows that I am no longer a favourite to aspire to win a tournament.
Neither was Nadal irked, nor was he calling anybody stupid.
But I guess the headline draws more clicks than "Nadal calls Tsitsipas opinion stupid".
It is very clickbaity. I don't love "crashes out," either. "Nadal out of Barcelona Open, calls Tsitsipas opinion 'stupid'" would have been much better.
Last edited by meganfernandez on Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:16 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6034
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
- Location: India
- Has thanked: 3204 times
- Been thanked: 1046 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Ha! Some of your Tennis.com colleagues are pretty uninformed too..let us not name them .meganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:43 amBurying this thread has been my primary career motivation.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 12:32 amThis is your fault ! If you didn't write so many good articles, we could have continued the old way!meganfernandez wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 7:58 pm
Good, because I always hated the original intention.
We need a thread for not-terrible journalism. Or does that go in Tennis Random, Random.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
- ponchi101
- Site Admin
- Posts: 16718
- Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
- Location: New Macondo
- Has thanked: 4239 times
- Been thanked: 6647 times
- Contact:
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
But then you are on our side!meganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:43 am ...
Burying this thread has been my primary career motivation.
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Let's do, actually! I won't rat you out. I doubt anyone is uninformed, but I'm curious what gives off that impression.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:35 amHa! Some of your Tennis.com colleagues are pretty uninformed too..let us not name them .meganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:43 amBurying this thread has been my primary career motivation.
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Sometimes, yes. There are sloppy mistakes. It's just that I make them, too. We all make mistakes in our jobs.ponchi101 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 2:34 pmBut then you are on our side!meganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:43 am ...
Burying this thread has been my primary career motivation.
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
-
- Posts: 6034
- Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
- Location: India
- Has thanked: 3204 times
- Been thanked: 1046 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
I certainly think Steve Tignor doesn't understand tennis much..makes some really crazy predictions, which are always wrong. Just to grab the headline perhapsmeganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:15 pmLet's do, actually! I won't rat you out. I doubt anyone is uninformed, but I'm curious what gives off that impression.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 6:35 amHa! Some of your Tennis.com colleagues are pretty uninformed too..let us not name them .meganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:43 am
Burying this thread has been my primary career motivation.
Sorry to ruin the party. Back to trashing sloppy Yahoo Sports editors.
- meganfernandez
- Posts: 5346
- Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2020 2:04 pm
- Has thanked: 2698 times
- Been thanked: 1910 times
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
I don't know him personally but I believe he knows tennis very well. He's just working off different information than you are. And he doesn't strike me as provocative. I think he has integrity. Certainly has a good reputation among journalists I admire.ashkor87 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2024 12:24 amI certainly think Steve Tignor doesn't understand tennis much..makes some really crazy predictions, which are always wrong. Just to grab the headline perhapsmeganfernandez wrote: ↑Thu Apr 18, 2024 5:15 pmLet's do, actually! I won't rat you out. I doubt anyone is uninformed, but I'm curious what gives off that impression.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests