Page 90 of 122

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 5:44 pm
by ti-amie
When the jackpots are this large it's ridiculous to play because the pool of people becomes so large and makes it easier for someone in the MidWest or a very rural state who is also retired to win.

I don't play at all but it would make better sense to play when the lottery jackpot is "normal".

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 5:59 pm
by ponchi101
Playing the lottery, statistically speaking, is never "dumb".
Think about it this way.
You are a person with a "regular" job: nurse, teacher, bank clerk, etc. What are your chances of EVER being a millionaire? A multimillionaire? Your chances are zero.
So, whatever small chance you have of hitting this jackpot, or any other million $$$ plus lottery, regardless of how small that chance is, is more than that zero chance of every being a millionaire on your work alone.
I busted my butt for 25 years in my industry, saved like a maniac, invested (poorly) on some mutual funds and stock. No kids, never took a bank loan or borrowed any money (interests will kill you), and I am still very short of the first million. If I were in the USA, I would buy one ticket. Dream for one day.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 6:15 pm
by JazzNU
$2 to change your entire family's life is why it makes sense to play the lottery. And you can pull that amount out of a forgotten change jar.

But given the size of the Powerball and Megamillions these days, I see no sound reason that there can't be a minimum of 10, 20, or 25 winners. Honestly, you'd sell more tickets because the chances of winning would increase because winning $100 million is still out of this world life changing. I seriously hate how often lately (and it's clearly intentional) that there is a single winning ticket. We used to get 2 or 3 winners now and then, but no more.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2022 7:24 pm
by Suliso
It's very difficult to save a million, even in Switzerland with a good job. I'm also well short of my first one (13 years)...

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 8:04 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:08 pm
by ponchi101
A million is still a million.
But I would keep working too. The sole way I stop working is if I were to hit the $5 million mark. Then I would feel I would have enough.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2022 9:13 pm
by Deuce
I could live very comfortably off of the interest of $1 Million. Or even less.
My wants are few.

"Some make their pride in how much their dinner costs. I make my pride in how little mine costs." - Henry Thoreau. :)

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Nov 11, 2022 3:11 pm
by ponchi101
I know this is a non-sequitur, but... my GF received this:
800 private jets landed in Sharm El Sheikh to tell the rest of the world we need to ride bicycles.
---o---
And I agree that we need to ride more bicycles, but, it has a little bit of a ring of truth.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Sat Nov 19, 2022 8:17 pm
by ti-amie



Okay

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 9:39 pm
by ti-amie


The person with the yellow flippers really wanted to gtfo.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 11:09 pm
by Deuce
ti-amie wrote: Sun Nov 20, 2022 9:39 pm

The person with the yellow flippers really wanted to gtfo.
I'm quite skeptical about the authenticity of this.
Because of the 'advancements' in technology, it is becoming more and more difficult to differentiate between what is real, and what is 'computer generated'. People are too eager today to create their own 'virtual reality' (an absolute oxymoron).
This doesn't look real to me. Add the fact that no source of the recording is mentioned, and... as I said, I am very skeptical.

The fact that we always must question now whether something is real/honest or not is tragic.

As a professional photographer said to me some years ago, when digital photography and computer editing of photos was first beginning: "A photo used to be proof that something really happened. But now, with all of this computer manipulation, a photo doesn't prove a damned thing. And that's a shame."

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Sun Nov 20, 2022 11:15 pm
by ti-amie
Deuce did you see the photographs from Ecuador vs Qatar in the World Cup thread? The one showing Ecuador's Enner Valencia making a header that ended in a goal for his country? Spectacular.

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Thu Nov 24, 2022 6:14 pm
by JazzNU
Happy Thanksgiving to everyone in the US. Hope you enjoy the day with family and friends. And good luck and God bless to all that are cooking today.


Image

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Thu Dec 01, 2022 9:27 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Dec 02, 2022 8:43 pm
by Suliso


The guy doing the folding, Robert J. Lang, holds a PhD in applied physics and is considered one of the leading theorists of the mathematics of origami.