Page 10 of 24
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 19, 2023 11:51 pm
by ponchi101
Good for you to post that. How clueless could they be?
Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Wed Sep 20, 2023 12:36 am
by meganfernandez
ponchi101 wrote:Good for you to post that. How clueless could they be?
I guess they took his word for it. They have a history but it has been awhile since he coached her.
It was also probably a breakdown between social media and editorial.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 2:05 am
by ashkor87
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/ca ... ta-preview
Annoys me that people think everyone lives in the US..of course it is Tignor so I don't expect any better
Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 2:39 am
by meganfernandez
Tennis magazine’s audience has traditionally been the US. It was an American magazine. Guessing their demo stats show it’s still the same.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 3:03 am
by ponchi101
Pretty bland article, to me. Just announcing what will happen this week.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 3:44 am
by ashkor87
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Tue Sep 26, 2023 3:03 am
Pretty bland article, to me. Just announcing what will happen this week.
That isn't what annoys me ..he is talking of matches in the middle of the night..for me, this swing is the best, that is where I live!
The USO is the worst for me, middle of the night . I know Tennis is an American magazine but they do have global pretensions. I once wrote to Wertheim complimenting him on being global and unbiased...he is the best at that..
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Sep 26, 2023 4:01 am
by ponchi101
Ok. I see.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:35 am
by meganfernandez
Not the best place for this, but there's no other obvious thread. Racquet is in trouble. Not necessarily dead, but out of money.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 5:48 pm
by mmmm8
meganfernandez wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:35 am
Not the best place for this, but there's no other obvious thread. Racquet is in trouble. Not necessarily dead, but out of money.
Very interesting dirt
$100 (including shipping) for 4 issues... yes, probably better off to rebrand as a creative agency.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:34 pm
by meganfernandez
mmmm8 wrote:meganfernandez wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:35 am
Not the best place for this, but there's no other obvious thread. Racquet is in trouble. Not necessarily dead, but out of money.
Very interesting dirt
$100 (including shipping) for 4 issues... yes, probably better off to rebrand as a creative agency.
Do you at least get a tote bag?
I bet a lot of people paid it. You pay for the association. A lot of magazines are like that. Aspirational identity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2023 2:26 pm
by mmmm8
meganfernandez wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 11:34 pm
mmmm8 wrote:meganfernandez wrote: ↑Tue Nov 14, 2023 2:35 am
Not the best place for this, but there's no other obvious thread. Racquet is in trouble. Not necessarily dead, but out of money.
Very interesting dirt
$100 (including shipping) for 4 issues... yes, probably better off to rebrand as a creative agency.
Do you at least get a tote bag?
I bet a lot of people paid it. You pay for the association. A lot of magazines are like that. Aspirational identity.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
No tote bag. You can buy one of their merch collaboration totes for US$265.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2023 12:10 am
by ashkor87
https://www.tennis.com/news/articles/at ... itrov-2023
'stardom called and he answered the phone'..very nice!! @meganfernandez
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2023 12:55 am
by meganfernandez
thanks!!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2023 2:43 pm
by meganfernandez
Who remembers the player named Zuzana that Ben was obsessed with when he was just a little tennis TATeur? Was her last name Ondraskova? Craig Shapiro is interviewing Ben today or tomorrow for his next podcast, and I told him to throw out this name, see what he says. Is that the right Zuzana?
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Mon Dec 04, 2023 4:34 pm
by patrick
Correct on Ben liking Zuzana before he got famous. Think you got her last name correct.