Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Nov 26, 2024 12:45 am
Talk About Tennis 2.0
We still talk about tennis. And much more.
https://talkabouttennis2.com/
World News Random, Random
Page 127 of 129
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:01 am
Devon fishermen left feeling 'betrayed' by Brexit
'Brexit was sold to our fishermen as a golden opportunity, yet the truth is that many fishermen have experienced the complete opposite'
By Guy Henderson Local Democracy Reporter
08:49, 25 NOV 2024
Devon fishermen are claimed to have been left feeling 'betrayed' by Brexit - something they originally thought would benefit them.
South Devon MP Caroline Voaden told the House of Commons the fishermen "face a landscape filled with uncertainty, rather than the bright, sunlit uplands they were promised".
The Liberal Democrat MP, whose constituency includes Brixham, was speaking during a debate on fishing policy. Brixham, she said, was the most valuable port in England and Wales in terms of catch landed, recording £60 million in fish sales last year.
However, it faced what she called ‘profound challenges’, many of which had been exacerbated by withdrawing from the European Union.
She told MPs: “Despite the promises that some made during the referendum campaign – promises of greater control, increased quotas and a more prosperous future -too many of our fishers now find themselves in a precarious position.
“Brexit was sold to our fishermen as a golden opportunity, yet the truth is that many fishermen have experienced the complete opposite. Instead of gaining more control, they have met a series of hurdles that make their lives harder.”
Immediately after Brexit a number of people in the Brixham fishing industry were featured in the national press talking about how promises of easiest trade with Europe, made during the run-up to the referendum, had failed to materialise.
Mrs Voaden went on: “They are now facing massive trade barriers. The sheer cost of additional paperwork has been eye-watering, with fishermen struggling to pass on increased selling prices to their long-standing customers. This is not the control that was promised; it is a recipe for frustration and despair.”
Mrs Voaden agreed with Grimsby Labour MP Melanie Onn that the fishing industry had been ‘sold down the river’.
She added: “Funnily enough, Brixham was quite a Brexit-supporting community. As a proud remainer, I had hesitations about Brixham as part of the constituency at first, but as I tour the constituency, I find it astonishing how many people in the local fishing community openly tell me that they feel betrayed and that they were lied to with promises that could never have been met.”
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/p ... ed-9741609
'Brexit was sold to our fishermen as a golden opportunity, yet the truth is that many fishermen have experienced the complete opposite'
By Guy Henderson Local Democracy Reporter
08:49, 25 NOV 2024
Devon fishermen are claimed to have been left feeling 'betrayed' by Brexit - something they originally thought would benefit them.
South Devon MP Caroline Voaden told the House of Commons the fishermen "face a landscape filled with uncertainty, rather than the bright, sunlit uplands they were promised".
The Liberal Democrat MP, whose constituency includes Brixham, was speaking during a debate on fishing policy. Brixham, she said, was the most valuable port in England and Wales in terms of catch landed, recording £60 million in fish sales last year.
However, it faced what she called ‘profound challenges’, many of which had been exacerbated by withdrawing from the European Union.
She told MPs: “Despite the promises that some made during the referendum campaign – promises of greater control, increased quotas and a more prosperous future -too many of our fishers now find themselves in a precarious position.
“Brexit was sold to our fishermen as a golden opportunity, yet the truth is that many fishermen have experienced the complete opposite. Instead of gaining more control, they have met a series of hurdles that make their lives harder.”
Immediately after Brexit a number of people in the Brixham fishing industry were featured in the national press talking about how promises of easiest trade with Europe, made during the run-up to the referendum, had failed to materialise.
Mrs Voaden went on: “They are now facing massive trade barriers. The sheer cost of additional paperwork has been eye-watering, with fishermen struggling to pass on increased selling prices to their long-standing customers. This is not the control that was promised; it is a recipe for frustration and despair.”
Mrs Voaden agreed with Grimsby Labour MP Melanie Onn that the fishing industry had been ‘sold down the river’.
She added: “Funnily enough, Brixham was quite a Brexit-supporting community. As a proud remainer, I had hesitations about Brixham as part of the constituency at first, but as I tour the constituency, I find it astonishing how many people in the local fishing community openly tell me that they feel betrayed and that they were lied to with promises that could never have been met.”
https://www.plymouthherald.co.uk/news/p ... ed-9741609
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:07 pm
The poor darlings. They did not understand the deal.
Sniff, sniff.
Sniff, sniff.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:10 pm
There's not a lot of teeth in this, yet, but I appreciate there's an effort being made to do something. The Facebooks, Instas, Tin Tok's etc are, to me, a cancer to society.
Australia Has Barred Everyone Under 16 From Social Media. Will It Work?
The law sets a minimum age for users of platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X. How the restriction will be enforced online remains an open question.
Two boys wearing school uniforms looking at their phones.
In Melbourne on Wednesday. Australia passed a social media ban for children despite feasibility concerns.Credit...William West/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Victoria Kim
By Victoria Kim
Nov. 28, 2024, 7:19 a.m. ET
Australia has imposed a sweeping ban on social media for children under 16, one of the world’s most comprehensive measures aimed at safeguarding young people from potential hazards online. But many details were still unclear, such as how it will be enforced and what platforms will be covered.
After sailing through Parliament’s lower house on Wednesday, the bill passed the Senate on Thursday with bipartisan support. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said that it puts Australia at the vanguard of efforts to protect the mental health and well-being of children from detrimental effects of social media, such as online hate or bullying.
The law, he has said, puts the onus on social media platforms to take “reasonable steps” to prevent anyone under 16 from having an account. Corporations could be fined up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (about $32 million) for “systemic” failures to implement age requirements.
Neither underage users nor their parents will face punishment for violations. And whether children find ways to get past the restrictions is beside the point, Mr. Albanese said.
“We know some kids will find workarounds, but we’re sending a message to social media companies to clean up their act,” he said in a statement this month.
As with many countries’ regulations on alcohol or tobacco, the law will create a new category of “age-restricted social media platforms” accessible only to those 16 and older. How that digital carding will happen, though, is a tricky question.
The law specifies that users will not be forced to provide government identification as part of the verification process, a measure that the conservative opposition said was included after they raised concerns about privacy rights.
It is also not clear exactly which platforms will be covered by the ban. The prime minister has said that Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram and X will be included, but YouTube and messaging apps including WhatsApp are expected to be exempt.
France last year passed a law requiring parental consent for social media users under 15, and it has been pushing for similar measures across the European Union. Florida this year imposed a ban for users under 14 and required parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds, but that law could face constitutional challenges.
Leo Puglisi, a 17-year-old Australian teenager who runs a news site, 6 News, that is staffed mostly by teens, said he had full confidence that his 14-year-old brother would easily find a way to circumvent any restriction.
He described social media as an integral part of growing up today. He and his contemporaries are aware that it can cause harm, but they rely on it to find communities of people with similar interests, he said.
A blanket ban would do little to counteract the dangers of the platforms, he said.
“None of the harmful content would be removed. It just kicks the can down the road and throws you into the deep end at 16,” he said. “It might sound good on paper, but in reality it’s not practical.”
Image
A man in a suit walks toward a podium past three flags.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Canberra this month.Credit...Mick Tsikas/AAP Image, via Reuters
But Dany Elachi, who has five children between the ages of 7 and 15, said the law would help to change the norms around social media usage. Many parents concerned about its harmful effects feel they have no choice but to let their children use it so they don’t feel left out.
“When you think your child might be isolated, that’s what puts parents under a lot of pressure,” said Mr. Elachi, co-founder of the Heads Up Alliance, a network of parents who are trying to delay their children’s use of social media and smartphones. “If everybody misses out, no one misses out.”
Kylea Tink, an independent lawmaker representing North Sydney, criticized the bill in the debate in the lower house on Tuesday as a “blunt instrument.” She said the law would stop short of holding social media companies accountable for the safety of the product they are providing.
“They are not fixing the potholes; they are just telling our kids there won’t be any cars,” she said.
During the same debate, Stephen Bates of the Australian Greens party cited his experience as a 13-year-old addicted to the video game “The Sims.” His father installed a program so his computer would automatically shut down after an hour, he recalled.
“It took me 10 minutes to figure out how to get around that,” said Mr. Bates, now a 32-year-old lawmaker. “As the youngest person in this chamber and one of very, very few people in this place who grew up with this technology and with social media, I can say that change is needed but this bill is not it.”
Now that the law has passed, social media companies have a 12-month period to meet the requirements. The task of sorting out the details of its implementation will fall to Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner.
She said the technologies behind age verification were rapidly advancing, arising from past efforts to limit underage exposure to pornography or gambling sites. A trial commissioned by the Australian government is underway to test them.
In an interview, she said she had no doubt that tech giants would find a way to comply.
“They’ve got financial resources, technologies and some of the best brainpower,” she said. “If they can target you for advertising, they can use the same technology and know-how to identify and verify the age of a child.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/28/worl ... n-law.html
Australia Has Barred Everyone Under 16 From Social Media. Will It Work?
The law sets a minimum age for users of platforms like TikTok, Instagram and X. How the restriction will be enforced online remains an open question.
Two boys wearing school uniforms looking at their phones.
In Melbourne on Wednesday. Australia passed a social media ban for children despite feasibility concerns.Credit...William West/Agence France-Presse — Getty Images
Victoria Kim
By Victoria Kim
Nov. 28, 2024, 7:19 a.m. ET
Australia has imposed a sweeping ban on social media for children under 16, one of the world’s most comprehensive measures aimed at safeguarding young people from potential hazards online. But many details were still unclear, such as how it will be enforced and what platforms will be covered.
After sailing through Parliament’s lower house on Wednesday, the bill passed the Senate on Thursday with bipartisan support. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has said that it puts Australia at the vanguard of efforts to protect the mental health and well-being of children from detrimental effects of social media, such as online hate or bullying.
The law, he has said, puts the onus on social media platforms to take “reasonable steps” to prevent anyone under 16 from having an account. Corporations could be fined up to 49.5 million Australian dollars (about $32 million) for “systemic” failures to implement age requirements.
Neither underage users nor their parents will face punishment for violations. And whether children find ways to get past the restrictions is beside the point, Mr. Albanese said.
“We know some kids will find workarounds, but we’re sending a message to social media companies to clean up their act,” he said in a statement this month.
As with many countries’ regulations on alcohol or tobacco, the law will create a new category of “age-restricted social media platforms” accessible only to those 16 and older. How that digital carding will happen, though, is a tricky question.
The law specifies that users will not be forced to provide government identification as part of the verification process, a measure that the conservative opposition said was included after they raised concerns about privacy rights.
It is also not clear exactly which platforms will be covered by the ban. The prime minister has said that Snapchat, TikTok, Instagram and X will be included, but YouTube and messaging apps including WhatsApp are expected to be exempt.
France last year passed a law requiring parental consent for social media users under 15, and it has been pushing for similar measures across the European Union. Florida this year imposed a ban for users under 14 and required parental consent for 14- and 15-year-olds, but that law could face constitutional challenges.
Leo Puglisi, a 17-year-old Australian teenager who runs a news site, 6 News, that is staffed mostly by teens, said he had full confidence that his 14-year-old brother would easily find a way to circumvent any restriction.
He described social media as an integral part of growing up today. He and his contemporaries are aware that it can cause harm, but they rely on it to find communities of people with similar interests, he said.
A blanket ban would do little to counteract the dangers of the platforms, he said.
“None of the harmful content would be removed. It just kicks the can down the road and throws you into the deep end at 16,” he said. “It might sound good on paper, but in reality it’s not practical.”
Image
A man in a suit walks toward a podium past three flags.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese in Canberra this month.Credit...Mick Tsikas/AAP Image, via Reuters
But Dany Elachi, who has five children between the ages of 7 and 15, said the law would help to change the norms around social media usage. Many parents concerned about its harmful effects feel they have no choice but to let their children use it so they don’t feel left out.
“When you think your child might be isolated, that’s what puts parents under a lot of pressure,” said Mr. Elachi, co-founder of the Heads Up Alliance, a network of parents who are trying to delay their children’s use of social media and smartphones. “If everybody misses out, no one misses out.”
Kylea Tink, an independent lawmaker representing North Sydney, criticized the bill in the debate in the lower house on Tuesday as a “blunt instrument.” She said the law would stop short of holding social media companies accountable for the safety of the product they are providing.
“They are not fixing the potholes; they are just telling our kids there won’t be any cars,” she said.
During the same debate, Stephen Bates of the Australian Greens party cited his experience as a 13-year-old addicted to the video game “The Sims.” His father installed a program so his computer would automatically shut down after an hour, he recalled.
“It took me 10 minutes to figure out how to get around that,” said Mr. Bates, now a 32-year-old lawmaker. “As the youngest person in this chamber and one of very, very few people in this place who grew up with this technology and with social media, I can say that change is needed but this bill is not it.”
Now that the law has passed, social media companies have a 12-month period to meet the requirements. The task of sorting out the details of its implementation will fall to Julie Inman Grant, Australia’s eSafety Commissioner.
She said the technologies behind age verification were rapidly advancing, arising from past efforts to limit underage exposure to pornography or gambling sites. A trial commissioned by the Australian government is underway to test them.
In an interview, she said she had no doubt that tech giants would find a way to comply.
“They’ve got financial resources, technologies and some of the best brainpower,” she said. “If they can target you for advertising, they can use the same technology and know-how to identify and verify the age of a child.”
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/28/worl ... n-law.html
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:14 pm
The last sentence is not totally accurate. Sure, they can target you for advertisement, but that is because they can see what you buy. It is not the same for age related things.
I do hope they succeed, though.
I do hope they succeed, though.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Thu Nov 28, 2024 1:23 pm
It's a very stupid decision. Teenagers will find a way around, but for everyone else there will be a loss of privacy and greatly increased paperwork. Any kind of attempt of enforcement will cost a lot too.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Fri Nov 29, 2024 1:02 am
David Frum is my first go to for analysis, but came across this interview & I thought it was an interesting perspective on the threat of new tariffs from the incoming Trump administration.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:19 pm
Anyone following the restarted Syrian civil war? Aleppo has fallen within just few days and government forces are in full retreat in the north of the country. Why now is not entirely clear, but important factors must be severe weakening of their partners Hezbollah, Iran and Russia.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:39 pm
The development is so fast that facts change on an hourly basis. After capturing Aleppo (pre war the largest city in Syria) only 24 h ago now the rebel forces are already in Hamas (5th largest) 140 km south. The third largest city Homs is only another 50 km further south. So far Assad has been unable to mount any meaningful resistance.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Sat Nov 30, 2024 10:36 pm
Suliso wrote: ↑Sat Nov 30, 2024 4:19 pm Anyone following the restarted Syrian civil war? Aleppo has fallen within just few days and government forces are in full retreat in the north of the country. Why now is not entirely clear, but important factors must be severe weakening of their partners Hezbollah, Iran and Russia.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:27 am
MeidasTouch @meidastouch.bsky.social
·
19m
JUST IN: In a major foreign policy speech, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warns Donald Trump that he will not side with the United States over the EU after Trump allies suggested he must make a choice between the two.
https://bsky.app/profile/meidastouch.bs ... entgz73k2q
·
19m
JUST IN: In a major foreign policy speech, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warns Donald Trump that he will not side with the United States over the EU after Trump allies suggested he must make a choice between the two.
https://bsky.app/profile/meidastouch.bs ... entgz73k2q
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:43 pm
Putin must be having a celebratory orgy at the moment.
What a victory. Without shooting a single missile.
What a victory. Without shooting a single missile.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 2:45 pm
Reminded me of Prime Minister Hugh Grant's speech from Love Actuallyti-amie wrote: ↑Tue Dec 03, 2024 3:27 am MeidasTouch @meidastouch.bsky.social
·
19m
JUST IN: In a major foreign policy speech, UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer warns Donald Trump that he will not side with the United States over the EU after Trump allies suggested he must make a choice between the two.
https://bsky.app/profile/meidastouch.bs ... entgz73k2q
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:46 pm
Dave Kang
@daveckang.bsky.social
A few random thoughts about Yoon's attempted coup/martial law:
1. It is so outrageous I am having trouble getting my head around it. I was in Korea in 1987 and I remember martial law. This is one of the dumbest moves by a Korean president in its history.
2. Yoon's fate is sealed...
3. The American DC Blob loved this guy. For all the wrong reasons. The DC establishment felt it had finally found a "reasonable" Korean who desperately wanted rapprochement with Japan and was willing to sing a song at a White House dinner -- what more do you need in a Korean leader? ...
4. But the DC crowd didn't realize -- or more likely, didn't care -- that Yoon was far outside the median Korean citizen on most things. Yoon hovered in the 20s for approval ratings. And his admin was demonstrably ill-concieved and almost clownish -- from the Pelosi visit to China relations...
5. And his domestic agenda had floundered noticeably as well. He'll be remembered for comically bad decisions like moving the presidential office to Yongsan, but it was more substantive matters that mattered...
6. And...this coup attempt is the final straw. There was nothing conceivably unstable or demanding such a move. And, the language and wording is straight from the dark days of the 1970s: "pro-communist, North Korea sympathizers," etc. etc...are you kidding me?
7. Finally -- the Korean people are amazing. Congratulations to the way they stood up for democracy, the rule of law, and common decency. We could use a little of that spirit here in the U.S.
@daveckang.bsky.social
A few random thoughts about Yoon's attempted coup/martial law:
1. It is so outrageous I am having trouble getting my head around it. I was in Korea in 1987 and I remember martial law. This is one of the dumbest moves by a Korean president in its history.
2. Yoon's fate is sealed...
3. The American DC Blob loved this guy. For all the wrong reasons. The DC establishment felt it had finally found a "reasonable" Korean who desperately wanted rapprochement with Japan and was willing to sing a song at a White House dinner -- what more do you need in a Korean leader? ...
4. But the DC crowd didn't realize -- or more likely, didn't care -- that Yoon was far outside the median Korean citizen on most things. Yoon hovered in the 20s for approval ratings. And his admin was demonstrably ill-concieved and almost clownish -- from the Pelosi visit to China relations...
5. And his domestic agenda had floundered noticeably as well. He'll be remembered for comically bad decisions like moving the presidential office to Yongsan, but it was more substantive matters that mattered...
6. And...this coup attempt is the final straw. There was nothing conceivably unstable or demanding such a move. And, the language and wording is straight from the dark days of the 1970s: "pro-communist, North Korea sympathizers," etc. etc...are you kidding me?
7. Finally -- the Korean people are amazing. Congratulations to the way they stood up for democracy, the rule of law, and common decency. We could use a little of that spirit here in the U.S.
Re: World News Random, Random
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2024 11:54 pm
William Gallo
@williamgallo.bsky.social
South Korea's main opposition party says it will immediately begin impeachment proceedings if Yoon does not step down immediately.
n.news.naver.com/article/003/...
Minjoo: "Proposal to impeach Yoon as early as today... Report to plenary session tomorrow" (Comprehensive)
Entered 2024.12.04. 7:53 AM Last modified 2024.12.04. 7:59 AM Original article
Reporter Kim Ji-eun
Reporter Shin Jae-hyun
"Perfect grounds for impeachment as an act of rebellion under martial law"
"Minister of National Defense and Minister of Public Administration and Security will also be held accountable"
[Seoul = Newsis] Reporter Kim Ji-eun and Shin Jae-hyeon = The Democratic Party of Korea announced on the 4th that "President Yoon Seok-yeol's declaration of martial law is a clear violation of the Constitution," and "If he does not step down immediately, we will immediately begin impeachment proceedings in accordance with the will of the people."
In a resolution released after an emergency general meeting of lawmakers at the National Assembly that day, the Democratic Party said, "The end of the Yoon Seok-yeol regime, which has mocked the Republic of Korea and its citizens and trampled democracy, is only miserable destruction."
The Democratic Party emphasized that "the declaration of martial law itself is null and void, a serious violation of the Constitution and the law," and "This is a serious act of rebellion and perfect grounds for impeachment."
It also warned that "the 50 million citizens of the Republic of Korea and the Democratic Party will not sit idly by and watch President Yoon's crime of destroying the Constitution by trampling on the Constitution and democracy," and "President Yoon Seok-yeol can no longer avoid the judgment of the people and history." It added
that "the Democratic Party will fight to the end with all the citizens to protect the democracy and constitutional order of the Republic of Korea."
The Democratic Party plans to propose an impeachment bill against President Yoon as early as today and report it to the plenary session on the 5th. According to the National Assembly Act, the impeachment bill must be voted on within 72 hours of the plenary session report, starting 24 hours after the plenary session.
Floor spokesperson Kang Yoo-jung met with reporters after attending the general meeting and explained, “If we hurry as much as possible, we can propose it today, report it tomorrow, and vote 24 hours later. This is the fastest schedule.”
Spokesperson Kang said, “Since there is no guarantee that martial law will not be imposed again, the members of the National Assembly have agreed to expedite the impeachment proposal, report, and vote processes,” and emphasized, “I hope that the people will trust the National Assembly and put their anxious minds at ease. The Democratic Party will actively and quickly work to return to normal days.”
He added, “In order to impose martial law, the consent of the Minister of National Defense and the Minister of Public Administration and Security is absolutely essential,” and “Holding the two ministers accountable will also be done during the process of proposing the impeachment bill.”
The impeachment of the president must be proposed by a majority of the members of the National Assembly and approved by more than two-thirds of the members. Out of the 300 members of the National Assembly, 108 are from the People Power Party, so at least 8 must participate in the impeachment.
The Democratic Party will hold an emergency rally in front of the National Assembly building at noon today to condemn the illegal martial law.
https://n.news.naver.com/article/003/0012940138
Google translation from Korean
@williamgallo.bsky.social
South Korea's main opposition party says it will immediately begin impeachment proceedings if Yoon does not step down immediately.
n.news.naver.com/article/003/...
Minjoo: "Proposal to impeach Yoon as early as today... Report to plenary session tomorrow" (Comprehensive)
Entered 2024.12.04. 7:53 AM Last modified 2024.12.04. 7:59 AM Original article
Reporter Kim Ji-eun
Reporter Shin Jae-hyun
"Perfect grounds for impeachment as an act of rebellion under martial law"
"Minister of National Defense and Minister of Public Administration and Security will also be held accountable"
[Seoul = Newsis] Reporter Kim Ji-eun and Shin Jae-hyeon = The Democratic Party of Korea announced on the 4th that "President Yoon Seok-yeol's declaration of martial law is a clear violation of the Constitution," and "If he does not step down immediately, we will immediately begin impeachment proceedings in accordance with the will of the people."
In a resolution released after an emergency general meeting of lawmakers at the National Assembly that day, the Democratic Party said, "The end of the Yoon Seok-yeol regime, which has mocked the Republic of Korea and its citizens and trampled democracy, is only miserable destruction."
The Democratic Party emphasized that "the declaration of martial law itself is null and void, a serious violation of the Constitution and the law," and "This is a serious act of rebellion and perfect grounds for impeachment."
It also warned that "the 50 million citizens of the Republic of Korea and the Democratic Party will not sit idly by and watch President Yoon's crime of destroying the Constitution by trampling on the Constitution and democracy," and "President Yoon Seok-yeol can no longer avoid the judgment of the people and history." It added
that "the Democratic Party will fight to the end with all the citizens to protect the democracy and constitutional order of the Republic of Korea."
The Democratic Party plans to propose an impeachment bill against President Yoon as early as today and report it to the plenary session on the 5th. According to the National Assembly Act, the impeachment bill must be voted on within 72 hours of the plenary session report, starting 24 hours after the plenary session.
Floor spokesperson Kang Yoo-jung met with reporters after attending the general meeting and explained, “If we hurry as much as possible, we can propose it today, report it tomorrow, and vote 24 hours later. This is the fastest schedule.”
Spokesperson Kang said, “Since there is no guarantee that martial law will not be imposed again, the members of the National Assembly have agreed to expedite the impeachment proposal, report, and vote processes,” and emphasized, “I hope that the people will trust the National Assembly and put their anxious minds at ease. The Democratic Party will actively and quickly work to return to normal days.”
He added, “In order to impose martial law, the consent of the Minister of National Defense and the Minister of Public Administration and Security is absolutely essential,” and “Holding the two ministers accountable will also be done during the process of proposing the impeachment bill.”
The impeachment of the president must be proposed by a majority of the members of the National Assembly and approved by more than two-thirds of the members. Out of the 300 members of the National Assembly, 108 are from the People Power Party, so at least 8 must participate in the impeachment.
The Democratic Party will hold an emergency rally in front of the National Assembly building at noon today to condemn the illegal martial law.
https://n.news.naver.com/article/003/0012940138
Google translation from Korean