Talk About Tennis 2.0

What the...

Updated
Aug. 18, 2025, 6:35 p.m. ET13 minutes ago
Maggie Haberman David E. Sanger and Jim Tankersley

Here’s the latest.
President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine met with President Trump and an extraordinary delegation of European leaders at the White House on Monday, seeking to defend his nation’s interests as Mr. Trump presses for a quick peace agreement with Russia that would require Ukraine to make sweeping concessions.

Mr. Trump and Mr. Zelensky huddled for several hours in the East Room with the small group of European leaders, who had rushed to Washington to support the Ukrainian president in talks about how to end the war despite serious disagreements over the path forward. After the meetings, Mr. Trump called President Vladimir V. Putin of Russia while Mr. Zelensky and the other European leaders were still at the White House, two people briefed on the call said.

Mr. Trump confirmed the call in a post on Truth Social, giving no details about what he had relayed to Mr. Putin. He portrayed the meetings with the European leaders as fruitful and said they discussed security guarantees for Ukraine and how they would be implemented, a subject that — if it were to include NATO troops — was preemptively rejected by Russia on Monday.

Mr. Trump also said that he had initiated steps for a meeting between Mr. Zelensky and Mr. Putin, at a site to be determined, and said it would be followed by a further trilateral meeting that he would attend.

Yuri Ushakov, Mr. Putin’s foreign policy aide, said the Russian president and Mr. Trump spoke for 40 minutes and agreed that more senior negotiators would be appointed for direct talks between Russia and Ukraine. But Mr. Ushakov, in his comments to Rossiya 24, a state-run news channel, made no mention about Mr. Putin himself participating.

(...)

But details of any progress toward peace were scarce. And Mr. Zelensky, now three and a half years into a war instigated by Russia, was expected to soon confront a difficult choice: surrender territory in exchange for vague promises for Ukraine’s future security, or hold his ground and risk reigniting Mr. Trump’s anger.

The initial interactions were a striking departure from the tone of Mr. Zelensky’s previous visit to the White House in February, when Mr. Trump and Vice President JD Vance berated him in the Oval Office on live television. Mr. Vance said nothing this time, and both presidents were genial. Mr. Zelensky absorbed jokes about his suit and handed Mr. Trump a letter his wife had written to the first lady, Melania Trump.

On Monday, Mr. Trump, a skeptic of multilateral alliances and deeply desiring of a Nobel Peace Prize, was not specific about what security guarantees for Ukraine would look like, although he said the U.S. would help in some way, and he did not rule out involving American troops.

While Mr. Zelensky said he was ready for a trilateral meeting with Mr. Putin, he has steadfastly rejected ceding land to Russia. But as Mr. Trump has aligned more closely with Russia after his warm meeting with Mr. Putin, Mr. Zelensky faces increased pressure to persuade the United States that Ukraine should get a better deal.

In a sign of the alarm among allies, a posse of European leaders — including Keir Starmer of Britain, President Emmanuel Macron of France and two leaders whom Mr. Trump generally likes, Giorgia Meloni of Italy and Alexander Stubb of Finland — had rushed to join Monday’s meetings in an effort to show solidarity with Ukraine and “to defend the interests of the Europeans,” according to Mr. Macron.

Several top European officials have warned that if Mr. Putin, who has a history of breaking diplomatic commitments, is not stopped in Ukraine, he could try to take more European territory by force.

Mr. Zelensky on Sunday labeled talk of U.S. security guarantees “a significant change” in the U.S. position. But he doesn’t have the authority to make the most important concession that Mr. Putin appears to be demanding: giving up all of the eastern Donbas region, including territory that Ukraine still controls, to Russia. Ukraine’s Constitution requires a referendum to cede territory, and the vast majority of Ukrainians oppose doing so.

https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/08/18 ... aine-putin

From WaPo live updates:

No indication Putin has agreed to meet with Trump, Zelensky

Catherine Belton and Robyn Dixon

There was no indication Monday evening that Russian President Vladimir Putin had agreed to a trilateral meeting with President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky following the White House talks, a potential indication that any peace deal could still be out of reach. Kremlin foreign policy aide Yuri Ushakov told reporters that during a 40-minute phone call, Trump and Putin had discussed “the idea that it would be advisable to explore the possibility of raising the level of representatives of the Ukrainian and Russian sides participating in the negotiations.”

Putin and Trump “agreed to continue to maintain close contact with each other on Ukrainian and other issues on the international and bilateral agenda. The Russian president once again noted the importance of Donald Trump’s personal efforts to find solutions leading to a long-term settlement in Ukraine,” Ushakov said.

“The conversation was frank and constructive,” he added.

Earlier Monday, Russia’s Foreign Ministry sharply warned that Russia would not accept forces from any NATO nation on Ukrainian soil, calling it “categorically unacceptable” and claiming it could lead to “an uncontrolled escalation of the conflict with unpredictable consequences.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... a-ukraine/

Drew Harwell‬
‪@drewharwell.com‬
· 1h
Showing the endangered leader of an invaded country my hats

Trump ordered strike on suspected drug boat to send a message, Rubio says
The administration has not provided a legal authority or justification for the attack Tuesday that killed 11 people.

Updated
September 3, 2025 at 5:48 p.m. EDTyesterday at 5:48 p.m. EDT


A video posted by President Donald Trump shows a vessel he says was transporting illegal narcotics to the United States as it is struck by the U.S. military in the southern Caribbean. (Donald Trump/Truth Social/Reuters)

By John Hudson, Samantha Schmidt and Alex Horton

MEXICO CITY — U.S. forces could have stopped the boat that officials say was carrying illegal drugs from Venezuela to the United States on Tuesday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said, but President Donald Trump chose instead to destroy it, killing 11 people on board, to send a deterrent message to traffickers.

“Instead of interdicting it, on the president’s orders, we blew it up — and it’ll happen again,” Rubio told reporters Wednesday in Mexico City.

U.S. forces launched a “precision strike” on the vessel as it traveled through the Caribbean Sea, U.S. officials said. When asked if they warned the crew, Rubio said the vessel, like others carrying drugs, posed an “immediate threat to the United States,” giving the country the right to destroy it.

“The president has a right to eliminate immediate threats to the United States,” Rubio said. “This president is not a talker; he’s a doer — he’s going to do it.”

White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in a statement that the strike was “conducted against the operations of a designated terrorist organization and was taken in defense of vital U.S. national interests and in the collective self-defense of other nations,” an apparent reference to the 2001 authorization for the use of military force enacted by Congress after the 9/11 terrorist attacks that year. It authorizes the use of force against the perpetrators of the al-Qaeda attacks and to prevent “future acts of international terrorism.” Various lawmakers have tried unsuccessfully for years to repeal the measure, including Vice President JD Vance, who as a senator in 2023 co-sponsored the End Endless Wars Act.

Kelly also said that “the strike was fully consistent with the law of armed conflict.” Interpretation of the international law generally depends on the definition of “armed conflict” between two parties, and whether those attacked were participants in it.

The administration has not said how the vessel was targeted, who was on board or the types and quantities of drugs they were allegedly smuggling.

Rubio argued the strike was justified because interdicting drug-smuggling ships yields insufficient results. “It doesn’t work,” he said. Cartels factor in a 2 percent loss from interdictions, he said, arguing that drug seizures won’t stop them.

“What will stop them is if you blow them up,” Rubio said. “The president is going to wage war on narco-terrorist organizations.”

Aerial imagery posted by Trump and other officials on Tuesday shows a modestly sized boat speeding through open water and then being engulfed in flames.

“We have tapes of them speaking,” Trump said from the Oval Office on Wednesday. “It was massive amounts of drugs coming into our country to kill a lot of people, and everybody fully understands it. You see it, you see the bags of drugs all over the boat, and they were hit.”

Neither the White House nor the Pentagon has produced visual evidence that clearly shows 11 people were on board the vessel. The Trump administration has not released crew members’ names. Some criminal groups smuggle drugs and people, and the Caribbean also is a common transit point for unlawful migration to the United States.

Trump and other officials have claimed the alleged smugglers were connected to Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, a U.S. adversary. Federal prosecutors in 2020 secured an indictment accusing the authoritarian socialist of narcoterrorism; the State Department last month raised the reward for information leading to his arrest or conviction to $50 million.

Maduro is running the South American nation “effectively as a kingpin of a drug narco state,” Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said on “Fox & Friends” on Wednesday morning. “Nicolás Maduro, as he considers whether or not he wants to continue be a narco trafficker, has some decisions to make.”

“It won’t stop with just this strike,” Hegseth said. “Anyone else trafficking in those waters who we know is a designated narco-terrorist will face the same fate.”

Trump said U.S. forces “positively identified” the vessel’s crew as members of Tren de Aragua, a criminal group his administration has sought to connect to Maduro and violent crime in the United States. Hegseth said Wednesday the U.S. government “knew exactly who was in that boat” and identified them as “Tren de Aragua, a narco-terrorist organization designated by the United States, trying to poison our country with illicit drugs.”

Tren de Aragua has not been associated with large-scale drug trafficking, said Jeremy McDermott, the co-founder and co-director of InSight Crime, which has researched the Venezuelan gang. The gang, which has a presence in several Latin American countries, has focused on extortion, human smuggling and human trafficking, preying particularly on Venezuelans who have fled Maduro’s rule.

“Up until now, we do not qualify the Tren de Aragua as a transnational drug-trafficking organization,” McDermott said. “We have been unable to link it to any multi-ton shipments crossing any frontiers.”

Gen. William Salamanca, who until this year served as director of Colombia’s national police, described Tren de Aragua as a transnational criminal network with major capacity for expansion. In several cities, he said, gang members were involved in smaller-scale “microtrafficking,” playing a secondary role to larger organizations in the drug trade. But he said he “never ruled out the possibility” that the group could expand that line of operations.

South America has in recent years produced record amounts of cocaine to ship to the U.S. and Europe, but it’s unclear how much of the drug flows through Venezuela. Maduro’s government does not release reliable seizure data.

A retired Drug Enforcement Administration agent who was involved in Venezuela investigations in recent years said Venezuelan government officials since former president Hugo Chávez have allowed cocaine to be trafficked unimpeded from Venezuela to the U.S. and taken a cut of the proceeds. The retired agent, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive information, compared the system to the U.S. mafia model, in which people or families control regions.

The retired agent said Tren de Aragua was not a focus of his investigations into drug trafficking in Venezuela in recent years.

The U.S. Coast Guard sometimes shoots out the engines of go-fast boats during maritime interdictions, the former agent said, but killing the crew is new for the United States.

“How long are you going to do it?” he asked. “The drug traffickers are like cockroaches. They’ll wait you out. They’ll do something else, and once you leave, they’ll go back.”

The U.S. has traditionally considered international drug trafficking a matter for domestic law enforcement. Border agencies manage the land frontiers; the Coast Guard patrols territorial waters, boards vessels and makes arrests.

Since the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, the government has expanded the circumstances in which it says it may use lethal military force. But the strike Tuesday represents a new escalation.

Mary Ellen O’Connell, a professor of law at the University of Notre Dame, said the strike violated international law. The U.S. is not in armed conflict with Venezuela or its criminal elements, she noted, which means it violated the suspects’ right to life.

It also raises the possibility that Trump, in pursuit of other traffickers, could launch military strikes within the U.S., she said.

“When the president decides this is a person who can be killed summarily, there’s no restraint on him,” O’Connell said. “It’s a very dangerous new move.”

Hegseth linked Tren de Aragua to U.S. overdose deaths and accused the gang of “trying to poison” Americans. The overwhelming majority of drug overdose deaths in recent years in the U.S. were caused by fentanyl, which is not generally produced in or smuggled in large quantities from South America.

The U.S. has dispatched an unusually large number of warships to the waters around Central and South American in recent weeks for what officials have described as anti-drug-trafficking operations. Maduro has warned Venezuelans of a possible U.S. invasion, dispatched troops to Venezuela’s border with Colombia and called on civilians to join militias to defend the country.

Neither Maduro nor other top Venezuelan officials have responded publicly to the attack Tuesday. But communications minister Freddy Ñáñez claimed the video released by Trump was created using artificial intelligence.

“Enough of Marco Rubio’s warmongering and attempts to stain President Donald Trump’s hands with blood,” Ñáñez said in a social media post.

Colombian President Gustavo Petro called the attack “murder.”

“We have been capturing civilians transporting drugs for decades without killing them,” Petro said. “Those who transport drugs are not the big drug lords, but very poor young people from the Caribbean and the Pacific.”

On Capitol Hill, congressional staffers said Wednesday that lawmakers have pressed the Trump administration for details but had so far received no substantive response.

Rep. Adam Smith (D-Washington), the top Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, called the strike “deeply concerning.”

“The administration has not identified the authority under which this action was taken, raising the question of its legality and constitutionality,” Smith said. “The lack of information and transparency from the administration is even more concerning. Does this mean Trump thinks he can use the U.S. military anywhere drugs exist, are sold or shipped? What is the risk of dragging the United States into yet another military conflict?”

Latin American leaders have expressed mounting concern that the U.S. could use military force unilaterally against drug cartels in their countries.

During Rubio’s visit, Mexico’s foreign secretary expressed relief that the U.S. and Mexico agreed to a form a “high-level implementation group” to crack down on drug cartels and secure the border together. Juan Ramón de la Fuente told reporters the agreement would ensure “respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Schmidt reported from Bogotá. Horton reported from Washington. Karen DeYoung, Noah Robertson and David Ovalle contributed to this report.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... drug-boat/

I wonder what his "fee"was?

South Korea Negotiates Release of Korean Workers Detained in Georgia Raid
The South Korean government said on Sunday that it would send a charter plane to the United States to retrieve hundreds of workers detained in an immigration raid.
By Choe Sang-Hun
Reporting from Seoul

Sept. 7, 2025
Updated 11:11 a.m. ET
Leer en español

South Korea reached a deal with the United States to free hundreds of South Korean workers arrested when U.S. immigration authorities raided the construction site of a battery plant in Georgia, the country’s presidential office said on Sunday.

“There are some administrative procedures left, but once they are cleared, we will send a chartered plane to bring our people home,” Kang Hoon-sik, the chief of staff for President Lee Jae Myung of South Korea, told a meeting of senior officials from the administration and the governing Democratic Party on Sunday.

Mr. Kang provided no further details, including when South Korea expected to send the plane. But his remarks provided the first strong indication that South Korea and the United States were working out a diplomatic solution after days of tensions between the allies.

U.S. immigration officials stormed the construction site of a major Hyundai-LG electric vehicle battery plant in Ellabell, Ga., on Thursday, arresting 475 people. Of them, about 300 were South Korean citizens, the South Korean foreign minister’s office said.

The raid unsettled South Korea, a crucial U.S. ally that has been asked to invest billions of dollars in the United States to build new factories and create jobs. It was part of the Trump administration’s aggressive crackdown on immigration, and U.S. officials said those arrested were in the United States illegally or working unlawfully.

“We will not let our guard down until we have our people safely back home,” Mr. Kang said. “We will also review and improve the visa system for those who go to the United States on business trips related to investment projects so that similar incidents won’t be repeated.”

The raid brought construction to a halt at the Georgia factory. Mr. Kang confirmed on Sunday that South Korea was still committed to finishing the project.

The Trump administration has encouraged South Korean industrial giants like Hyundai, Samsung and LG to invest in the United States. But the administration has also drastically tightened visa allocations, making it harder and more expensive for them to bring in skilled workers to build their factories.

Speaking Sunday on CNN’s “State of the Union,” the White House border czar, Tom Homan, defended the raid on the battery plant and said the administration planned to continue such large-scale raids, adding that it is a crime to work and live illegally in the United States.

Those arrested included dozens of LG workers who were on business trips with various visas or under a visa waiver program to provide technical guidance for building the battery factory, according to industry officials familiar with the project. Other detained South Korean workers had been hired by construction subcontractors working for Hyundai and LG, they said.

U.S. immigration officials accused the South Korean companies of discriminating against American workers by hiring unauthorized workers from abroad.

Erica L. Green contributed reporting.

Choe Sang-Hun is the lead reporter for The Times in Seoul, covering South and North Korea.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/07/worl ... ai-lg.html

I mean. How much of a coward can you be?
I know, I know, I know. This is a billions of dollars thing. But just pull the plug on the (expletive) factory. Let it sit there for a couple of years and let's see what happens then.
I am pretty sure that those 300 Koreans were not janitors.
Really. The capitulation. Nobody has a spine.

ponchi101 wrote: ↑Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:50 am I mean. How much of a coward can you be?
I know, I know, I know. This is a billions of dollars thing. But just pull the plug on the (expletive) factory. Let it sit there for a couple of years and let's see what happens then.
I am pretty sure that those 300 Koreans were not janitors.
Really. The capitulation. Nobody has a spine.

In this situation I would play along until the citizens of my country were safely home and not on their way to South Sudan or El Salvador. I'd even make a downpayment on his "fee".
Once they were secure I'd quietly do exactly what you say.

Apparently the woman who called ICE is a MAGAt trying to gather cred so she can run for office. Every post I've seen about her doxxes her so I won't post anymore than this.

Jon Cooper
‪@joncooper-us.bsky.social‬
Kamala Harris was correct about everything she warned us about.



NATO says it scrambled fighter jets, shot down Russian drones over Poland
The military called the breach of Poland’s airspace “unprecedented,” and it triggered a request by Warsaw to consult with fellow NATO members.

Updated
September 10, 2025 at 4:01 p.m. EDTtoday at 4:01 p.m. EDT

By David L. Stern, Siobhán O'Grady, Aaron Wiener, Michael Birnbaum and Andrew Jeong
KYIV — NATO fighter jets shot down Russian drones that violated Poland’s airspace while Russia was attacking targets in Ukraine, NATO officials and Poland’s military said Wednesday, in a rare clash between Moscow and militaries from the U.S.-led Western alliance.

The Russian action amounts to an unprecedented violation of Polish airspace and posed “a real threat” to Polish citizens, the Polish military’s Operational Command said in a statement.

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte said that Polish F-16s, Dutch F-35s and Italian AWACS surveillance aircraft were involved in responding to the breach of Polish airspace, as well as a NATO air-to-air refueling tanker and a German Patriot air defense system.

Under Article 5 of the NATO treaty, an armed attack on one ally is considered an attack on all. The country under threat has to request that the common defense clause be invoked and the other 31 allies must unanimously agree to do so.

Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said Poland, in coordination with NATO allies, had instead requested to activate Article 4 of the treaty, in which member states will consult on whether “the territorial integrity, political independence or security of any of the Parties is threatened.”

Senior European policymakers — many of whom said they believed that indications pointed toward the Russian incursion being deliberate — said it may have been a test of NATO resolve and readiness. One said it may have been intended to check NATO antiaircraft response times.

“It lasted seven hours and there were 19 breaches, both from Belarus and Ukraine,” Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski said in a text message. Belarusians “seemed to have advance knowledge,” Sikorski said.

Polish aircraft were scrambled, according to a statement from Polish Defense Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz. The country’s territorial defense forces were activated to conduct ground searches for the downed drones, he added.

In an address Wednesday morning to the Polish Parliament, Tusk said the first violation of Polish airspace was recorded around 11:30 p.m. Tuesday, and the last was detected around 6:30 a.m. “That gives you an idea of ​​the scale,” he said. “It lasted all night.”


Gen. Wieslaw Kukula, chief of the general staff of the Polish Armed Forces, and Marek Boron, commander in chief of police, attend a government meeting Wednesday in Warsaw, following violations of Polish airspace. (Kacper Pempel/Reuters)

Tusk said 19 violations were recorded, though figures were not final, and that three drones were confirmed shot down, with a fourth probably downed as well.

According to Tusk, this was the first time drones entering Polish airspace came from Belarus rather than Ukraine. “What is new is the direction from which the drones violating Polish airspace came — for the first time in the history of this war, they did not come from over Ukraine [but] a significant portion of these drones flew over Poland directly from Belarus,” he said.

The Russian chargé d’affaires in Poland, Andrei Ordash, dismissed the allegations of violations of Polish airspace. “We consider the accusations groundless,” he told Russian news agency RIA Novosti. “No evidence that these drones are of Russian origin has been presented.”

Russia’s Ministry of Defense said “no targets on Polish territory were planned,” when asked about the incident, but said that it had launched a major assault on western Ukraine.

President Donald Trump on Wednesday offered a cryptic expression about the airspace violation, writing on Truth Social, “What’s with Russia violating Poland’s airspace with drones? Here we go!”

The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment about whether Trump planned to speak to Russian President Vladimir Putin or take other action. One senior U.S. official focused on security issues said it was unclear what Trump meant.

But Republican hawks in Congress sought to capitalize on the moment to push a tougher stance on Russia.

“I completely agree with President @realDonaldTrump’s sentiment in response to Russia’s insane violation of Polish airspace for hours, deploying multiple drones,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-South Carolina) wrote on X. “Mr. President, Congress is with you. We stand ready to pass legislation authorizing bone crushing new sanctions and tariffs that can be deployed at your discretion. Our goal is to empower you as you deal with this mounting threat.”

Rep. Joe Wilson, (R-South Carolina) called the incursion “an act of war” in a post on X and said he had introduced legislation to punish Russia by “cutting off all trade with this terrorist dictatorship.” Wilson urged Trump to respond by providing more arms to Ukraine.

At NATO headquarters in Brussels, Rutte commended the “very successful reaction by NATO” to the Russian incursion, including actions by Polish, Dutch, Italian and German forces.

Rutte, speaking Wednesday morning after a meeting of the North Atlantic Council, the alliance’s political decision-making body, said that “allies expressed solidarity with Poland and denounced Russia’s reckless behavior.” An assessment of the situation is ongoing, he said.

“Allies are resolved to defend every inch of allied territory,” Rutte added.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, writing on social media, said that the violation of Polish airspace was “an extremely dangerous precedent for Europe” and reiterated calls for Ukraine’s supporters to increase sanctions against Moscow.


Police and military police secure parts of a damaged UAV shot down by Polish authorities at a site in Wohyn, Poland, on Wednesday. (Rafal Niedzielski/AP)

He said that “at least eight” Iranian-designed Shahed drones were aimed in the direction of Poland. “Not just one Shahed, which could be called an accident,” he said. “Moscow always tests the limits of what is possible and, if it does not meet a strong reaction, remains at a new level of escalation.”

As the investigation continued, Beata Syk-Jankowska, a spokeswoman for the regional prosecutor’s office in Lublin, Poland, said at a news conference that so far no explosives had been found in the recovered drone debris, according to Polish media. Syk-Jankowska described the downed UAVs as Gerbera drones, a cheap dummy version of the Shahed attack drones.

In Ukraine, even as many expressed solidarity with Poland, some commentators noted that Poland had experienced only a small taste of the war that has unfolded in Ukraine since 2022 — and was able to respond with the full backing of NATO and its powerful weaponry. Ukraine shot down hundreds of Russian drones during the same night, in many cases relying on antiquated machine guns because of shortages in advanced air defense systems.

“All these statements about the success of shooting down four drones in Poland look ridiculous compared to the fact that Ukraine shot down a hundred times more targets during the same attack. Yes, thanks to weapons from NATO countries — weapons that are in very short supply,” said Maria Kvitka, a Ukrainian defense consultant who works on foreign military assistance

The U.S. military maintains 10,000 troops in the western Polish city of Poznan, and the incident prompted a bipartisan chorus of criticism against Russia in Washington.

Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Illinois) said Putin was testing the resolve of the United States to protect Poland and the Baltic nations. “After the carnage Putin continues to visit on Ukraine, these incursions cannot be ignored,” he wrote on X.

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s foreign affairs chief, said this was “the most serious European airspace violation by Russia since the war began, and indications suggest it was intentional, not accidental.”

In November 2022, a projectile that NATO determined to be an errant Ukrainian air defense missile launched in response to Russian strikes landed on Polish territory, killing two people.

Romania also reported fragments of Russian drones landing in its territory in 2023 but did not invoke Article 5.

The incidents over Poland come as Moscow has escalated its air attacks on Ukraine, launching its largest to date on Sunday, with more than 800 drones and 13 missiles. The hours-long attack hit the main government building in Kyiv for the first time in the war and killed at least three people.

The overnight Russian attack that included the violation of Polish airspace included 415 drones, 42 cruise missiles and one ballistic missile and struck multiple Ukrainian regions, including Kyiv, Ukraine’s air force said.

Air raid sirens blared in Kyiv while explosions and machine gunfire echoed through the capital as air defense units tried to shoot down the Shahed drones. Residents rushed to bomb shelters or hunkered down in hallways and bathrooms as warnings circulated that Russia was preparing for another massive combined missile and drone strike on Ukraine.


The Ukrainian air defense fires at Russian drones above Kyiv on Wednesday. (Sergei Supinsky/AFP/Getty Images)

After a wave of deadly recent attacks on civilians, including one on Tuesday afternoon that killed at least 25 civilians waiting in line for their pensions in an eastern village, Kyiv is urging Europe and the U.S. to act on past promises to intensify sanctions on Russia.

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha wrote on X that the appearance of Russian drones in Poland shows “that Putin’s sense of impunity keeps growing because he was not properly punished for his previous crimes. … The longer he faces no strength in response, the more aggressive he gets.”

“A weak response now will provoke Russia even more — and then Russian missiles and drones will fly even further into Europe,” he added.

Sybiha urged NATO countries to use their air defense systems to intercept drones and missiles flying into Ukraine.

“Russia is trying and seeing what happens. There has been a major escalation after Beijing meetings last week,” said a senior European diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity to talk frankly about a sensitive security matter. “It’s a Russian play. They want to see if we react and how. It’s therefore imperative now to come with the strongest sanctions, ideally in sync with the U.S.”

Poland is one of several NATO member countries sharing a border with Russia. It invests more than 4 percent of its gross domestic product on defense, more than any other NATO member. In recent years, it has been on a weapons splurge, purchasing tanks, rocket systems and fighters from the U.S. and South Korea. Polish officials have said they intend to double the country’s military to 300,000 troops.

Poland has faced political divisions after a new president, Karol Nawrocki, took office last month. Nawrocki won the presidency with the backing of the conservative, E.U.-skeptic Law and Justice party, threatening to block and stall Tusk’s centrist agenda.

But on Wednesday, Tusk said he spoke with Nawrocki, and they were working in tandem.

“The president, the ministers and I are determined to act as one,” Tusk said, according to Polish media. “In times like these, we must pass the test of unity.”

Jeong reported from Seoul, Wiener from Berlin, and Birnbaum from Washington. Serhiy Morgunov in Kyiv, Natalia Abbakumova in Riga, and Niha Masih in Seoul contributed to this report.

correction
A previous version of this article attributed a quote to Rep. Joe Walsh of North Carolina. It was Rep. Joe Wilson of South Carolina who said the drones were an "act of war."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... raine-war/

The polish president also said it. That we have seen this movie before and Poland was next.

Bolsonaro sentenced to over 27 years in prison for coup plot in Brazil
Brazil’s Supreme Court ruled the former president tried to reverse his 2022 election loss with a plot that included plans to assassinate President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.

Updated
September 11, 2025 at 7:13 p.m. EDT12 minutes ago

By Marina Dias

BRASÍLIA — Former Brazilian president Jair Bolsonaro was found guilty Thursday of attempting a military coup to stay in power after his 2022 election loss, a plot that included plans to assassinate President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, and was sentenced to more than 27 years in prison in a case that has roiled this young democracy and strained its relations with President Donald Trump.

The 4-1 ruling by a panel of five justices of Brazil’s Supreme Court made Bolsonaro the first former president convicted of trying to undermine Latin America’s largest democracy. Advocates for accountability hoped the verdict would prove a turning point for a nation that has suffered more than a dozen coup attempts but historically has opted for political conciliation rather than prosecution. Trump, a Bolsonaro ally and friend, had imposed tariffs on Brazilian imports and sanctions on justices to pressure them to drop the case.

Bolsonaro and seven co-defendants were convicted of attempting a coup and four related charges.

Bolsonaro, 70, has denied wrongdoing. The right-wing populist did not attend the proceeding, which began last week in a building his supporters ransacked after his loss. In court, his attorney said there was no concrete evidence to link him to the plot to overturn the narrowest presidential election loss in Brazil’s four decades of democracy. He is expected to appeal.

With the conclusion of voting Thursday evening, the justices turned to sentencing. Bolsonaro faced up to 40 years in prison.

Bolsonaro and his co-defendants, who included an admiral and three generals, were found guilty of all charges against them: attempting a coup, involvement in an armed criminal organization, attempting the violent abolition of democratic rule of law, aggravated damage of the state’s assets and deterioration of listed heritage.

“The government wanted to remain in power by simply ignoring democracy — and that is what constitutes a coup d’état,” Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who was also named as a potential assassination target, said Tuesday from the bench. “The leader of the criminal group made it clear — publicly and in his own words — that he would never accept defeat at the ballot, a democratic loss in the elections, and that he would never abide by the will of the people.”

“They acted to hijack the soul of the republic,” said Justice Cármen Lúcia, who cast the third and deciding vote for conviction Thursday. “The case files show a coordinated criminal enterprise by the defendants, who adopted the methods of a digital militia to attack the judiciary, the electoral system, and the electronic voting machines.”

Bolsonaro has been under house arrest since early August for allegedly violating court orders to refrain from making public comments to intimidate or pressure public officials into canceling his trial. He will not be required to report to prison until he has exhausted his appeals.

One justice asked Wednesday that the case be annulled for lack of jurisdiction. Because the defendants have left office, Justice Luiz Fux argued, they no longer qualify for the special status that allowed them to be tried by the nation’s highest tribunal. The request did not have an immediate effect, but it could aid Bolsonaro in an appeal.

Lúcia, Moraes and Justices Flavio Dino and Cristiano Zanin voted to convict the former president and his co-defendants. Fux voted to acquit him. Then Moraes proposed a sentence of 27 years and three months and Dino, Lúcia and Zanin agreed.

Prosecutors described the case as necessary to protect Brazilian democracy from its greatest threat since the country’s military dictatorship ended in 1985. Bolsonaro and supporters including Trump have called it a witch hunt orchestrated by political rivals to keep him out of next year’s presidential election, a potential rematch with the left-wing Lula, 79.

After the verdict Thursday, Trump called Bolsonaro a “good man,” and drew parallels to his own experience.

“I watched that trial. I know him pretty well,” Trump told reporters at the White House. “I thought he was a good president of Brazil. And it’s very surprising that that could happen. That’s very much like they tried to do with me, but they didn’t get away with it at all.”

Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the verdict unjust and promised a response.“The political persecutions by sanctioned human rights abuser Alexandre de Moraes continue,” he wrote on X. “The United States will respond accordingly to this witch hunt.”

Bolsonaro was already prohibited from running for office until 2030 for spreading false information to undermine the credibility of Brazil’s electoral system. He has argued that the ban disenfranchises the many Brazilians who want to vote for him and hopes, with popular support, it will be overturned.

He’s also taken his defense beyond Brazil. Eduardo Bolsonaro, a federal congressman and son of the former president, moved to the United States this year and has lobbied the White House for help. In July, Trump announced diplomatic and economic sanctions to pressure Brazil and individual justices to drop the charges against his friend.

Moraes, who is overseeing the court’s investigations of Bolsonaro, was barred from entering the United States under the Global Magnitsky Act, an Obama-era law intended to punish corrupt foreign officials and serious human rights abusers. The Treasury ordered any assets he might own in the United States frozen and prohibited U.S. businesses and individuals from transacting business with him. Trump announced a 50 percent tariff on Brazilian goods entering the United States.

Moraes opened the proceedings last week by defending the court’s sovereignty from foreign threats. “This attempt of obstruction will not affect the impartiality or independence of the justices in this court,” he said.

Moraes told The Washington Post last month that U.S. authorities didn’t understand the case. “Here, we will uphold the Brazilian Constitution and the Brazilian laws,” he said, “regardless of internal or external pressures.”

Justices Luís Roberto Barroso, the president of the court, and Gilmar Mendes, a former president and the longest-serving current member, were not members of the panel that decided Bolsonaro’s case, but they attended the session Thursday in what watchers interpreted as representing institutional support for the process.

Brazilian authorities say Bolsonaro’s campaign to delegitimize the country’s electoral system and plan a military coup started in 2021 and culminated in the violent attacks on government buildings on Jan. 8, 2023, a week after Lula’s inauguration. Bolsonaro’s supporters stormed the presidential palace, congress and the Supreme Court in Brasília to demand he be reinstated in a riot that echoed the attempt by Trump supporters to stop the certification of Joe Biden’s 2020 victory at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

The evidence against Bolsonaro included a document that prosecutors said was a draft of an unpublished presidential decree that would have granted him emergency powers to seize control of the country’s top electoral court to ensure “fairness and correction.” Investigators said Bolsonaro, a former army officer, edited and presented the decree to military leaders, but was unable to secure the support he needed to move forward.

As part of the plot, prosecutors said, Bolsonaro approved a plan to assassinate Lula, Vice President Geraldo Alckmin and Moraes. They say a draft of the plan was printed at the presidential palace.

In court on Thursday, Moraes played a video that showed Bolsonaro talking about him. “This justice still has time to redeem himself and drop his investigations — or, rather, his time is up,” Bolsonaro says. “Step down, Alexandre de Moraes. Stop being a scoundrel!”


Supreme Court Justice Cármen Lúcia, right, speaks to Justice Alexandre de Moraes during Bolsonaro's trial on Tuesday. (Adriano Machado/Reuters)

Moraes framed the trial as a turning point for Brazilian democracy, but analysts say congress could undo at least some of the court’s work.

“It is highly likely that congress will soon approve an amnesty or reduced sentences for that broader group who was in Brasília on January 8th,” said Carlos Fico, a historian at the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. “As for Bolsonaro himself, if a right-wing candidate wins next year’s presidential election, a pardon for him is seen as a strong possibility.”

Bolsonaro’s allies have been pushing for an amnesty law for anyone, including the former president, accused of involvement in the coup attempt. But such a law would be subject to Supreme Court review. A majority of the justices have said the constitution prohibits pardons or amnesty for perpetrators of crimes against the democratic rule of law.

In another echo of Trump, Bolsonaro never formally conceded the 2022 election. He left for Florida before Lula’s inauguration and refused to hand over the presidential sash, the ritual that reaffirms the country’s democracy.

During his four-year presidency from 2019 to 2022, Bolsonaro dismantled environmental protections in the Amazon rainforest, downplayed the coronavirus pandemic and stoked calls among his supporters for a military intervention to prevent Lula’s return to power. He clashed frequently with the Supreme Court.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/20 ... sinations/