Page 17 of 26
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 05, 2024 8:06 pm
by meganfernandez
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 8:25 am
Sinner has announced his withdrawal ..there is no error in the headline, just mismatch between headline And post
A production error.

Someone pulled the wrong Sinjury story into the Home Page hopper. Rushing produces mistakes, just like in tennis!
Yes, I made up Sinjury.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 05, 2024 10:39 pm
by ponchi101
meganfernandez wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 8:06 pm
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Sun May 05, 2024 8:25 am
Sinner has announced his withdrawal ..there is no error in the headline, just mismatch between headline And post
A production error.

Someone pulled the wrong Sinjury story into the Home Page hopper. Rushing produces mistakes, just like in tennis!
Yes, I made up Sinjury.
Then copyright it

Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sat May 11, 2024 9:09 pm
by ti-amie
She understood. She's just too smart to fall for a "gotcha" question like that.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sat May 11, 2024 10:04 pm
by ponchi101
"Because the GOAT on clay is playing what is certainly his last Rome tournament, and the GOAT is coming back from injury, and I am crushing lower opponents in matches that have all the drama of a cat napping"
Happy now?
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 12, 2024 4:38 am
by skatingfan
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Sat May 11, 2024 10:04 pm
"Because the GOAT on clay is playing what is certainly his last Rome tournament, and the GOAT is coming back from injury, and I am crushing lower opponents in matches that have all the drama of a cat napping"
Happy now?
Also, someone dropped a water bottle on Novak's head.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 12, 2024 7:33 am
by ashkor87
He he..if someone had dropped a bottle on Iga's head ..
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 7:29 pm
by ponchi101
And I will be a jerk and bring this topic back to its original intention:
Screenshot 2024-05-15 162605.jpg
No, beats Zhang for Rome SEMI FINALS spot.
And you can see that is straight from the ATP site.
Somebody, please, bring back proof readers. In a hurry.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Wed May 15, 2024 11:26 pm
by ti-amie
ponchi101 wrote: ↑Wed May 15, 2024 7:29 pm
And I will be a jerk and bring this topic back to its original intention:
Screenshot 2024-05-15 162605.jpg
No, beats Zhang for Rome SEMI FINALS spot.
And you can see that is straight from the ATP site.
Somebody, please, bring back proof readers. In a hurry.
But...but AI!
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sat May 18, 2024 10:54 pm
by ti-amie
Good for Iga.
Tennis is the only sport that hides reporters names.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sat May 18, 2024 11:38 pm
by ponchi101
Sorry. Totally valid question, as far as I am concerned. She is good everywhere, that is true; it is not as if she had not won any other title on any other surface.
But the difference between clay and the other surfaces is notable
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sat May 18, 2024 11:57 pm
by ti-amie
The reporter phrased the question in the negative and I think that's what ticked Iga off. If he had asked "Why are you so dominant on clay?" Instead of "Why aren't you so dominant on other surfaces?" She would've probably given a nuanced answer.
In the real world she has more wins on hard than on clay.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 1:06 am
by ashkor87
Tignor has the score wrong in his story on the Rome finals on Tennis.com. Someone will blame the copy editr now, I am sure. But even I know the score, and I dont make a living on this.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 3:36 am
by skatingfan
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 1:06 am
Tignor has the score wrong in his story on the Rome finals on Tennis.com. Someone will blame the copy editr now, I am sure. But even I know the score, and I dont make a living on this.
Can't blame someone who doesn't exist - that's why these errors get through - there is limited, or no editing process any more, and it's incredibly difficult to spot errors in our own writing because our brains will fix the errors as we read.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 1:42 pm
by Owendonovan
skatingfan wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 3:36 am
ashkor87 wrote: ↑Sun May 19, 2024 1:06 am
Tignor has the score wrong in his story on the Rome finals on Tennis.com. Someone will blame the copy editr now, I am sure. But even I know the score, and I dont make a living on this.
Can't blame someone who doesn't exist - that's why these errors get through - there is limited, or no editing process any more, and it's incredibly difficult to spot errors in our own writing because our brains will fix the errors as we read.
My husband has me proof much of his writing. He's an editor and a writer for 40 years but I still catch simple errors every now and again. If you're self proofing your work, you can let same error go by 5 times.
Re: Great Tennis Journalism 2.0
Posted: Sun May 19, 2024 5:15 pm
by ponchi101
That's a good system
