Page 18 of 217

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:08 pm
by skatingfan
Andy finally equaled Roger in something. :D

Murray ties Federer

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:12 pm
by Suliso
He needed four tries to do it, so advantage Roger :)

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:20 pm
by skatingfan
Suliso wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:12 pm He needed four tries to do it, so advantage Roger :)
Federer got up 4-0, but now it's 4-4, so the set isn't over yet. And what's Rafa doing - still getting baggled.

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:20 pm
by Omess
skatingfan wrote:Andy finally equaled Roger in something. :D

Murray ties Federer
They have been busy. I remember when he joked that he should go back on the road because it was getting out of control

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/tennis/a ... 663032.amp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:54 pm
by the Moz
I say this with utmost respect, but who would want to have four children :freaking: :freaking: :freaking: :freaking:

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 1:58 pm
by meganfernandez
Omess wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:20 pm
skatingfan wrote:Andy finally equaled Roger in something. :D

Murray ties Federer
They have been busy. I remember when he joked that he should go back on the road because it was getting out of control

https://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/tennis/a ... 663032.amp


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That was an old article about their third kid. But they did indeed have a fourth. Almost no info here: https://www.atptour.com/en/news/andy-ki ... urth-child

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:40 pm
by ponchi101
the Moz wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:54 pm I say this with utmost respect, but who would want to have four children :freaking: :freaking: :freaking: :freaking:
At a time in which having children is almost a privilege, financially speaking.
No problems there for Andy, sure, but indeed, that is quite a brood.
So, what are the odds of the Federer twins meeting the Murray bros at a Wimby final, 20 some years from now?

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:51 pm
by meganfernandez
ponchi101 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:40 pm
the Moz wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 12:54 pm I say this with utmost respect, but who would want to have four children :freaking: :freaking: :freaking: :freaking:
At a time in which having children is almost a privilege, financially speaking.
No problems there for Andy, sure, but indeed, that is quite a brood.
So, what are the odds of the Federer twins meeting the Murray bros at a Wimby final, 20 some years from now?
is the fourth Murray a boy for sure? If so, both Fed and Andy have an entire Olympics tennis team under their roof.

Four kids would be wonderful if you can afford it. I don't have any kids, but when you're older and they have kids and you get to watch them all grow up... great way to spend the back half of your life.

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:58 pm
by ponchi101
The emotional and personal aspects are up to everybody. The financial aspects are clear: it is one of the main reasons why people are delaying or downright not having children. It is too much.
Surprisingly, it is the middle class that is affected the most. The rich are rich, so they are not affected, the poor are not going to be poorer by having children. Which is a terrible statement, but I can't phrase it any more palatable.

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:42 pm
by meganfernandez
ponchi101 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:58 pm The emotional and personal aspects are up to everybody. The financial aspects are clear: it is one of the main reasons why people are delaying or downright not having children. It is too much.
Surprisingly, it is the middle class that is affected the most. The rich are rich, so they are not affected, the poor are not going to be poorer by having children. Which is a terrible statement, but I can't phrase it any more palatable.
Absolutely. I never wanted kids. Now that I'm older and more stable, I think they'd be nice to have around, and grandkids, too. But honestly it's not how I've ever wanted to spend my time. Bless those that do - I am in awe of them. Parenting seems like the hardest job in the world.

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:13 pm
by the Moz
meganfernandez wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 3:42 pm
ponchi101 wrote: Fri Mar 12, 2021 2:58 pm The emotional and personal aspects are up to everybody. The financial aspects are clear: it is one of the main reasons why people are delaying or downright not having children. It is too much.
Surprisingly, it is the middle class that is affected the most. The rich are rich, so they are not affected, the poor are not going to be poorer by having children. Which is a terrible statement, but I can't phrase it any more palatable.
Absolutely. I never wanted kids. Now that I'm older and more stable, I think they'd be nice to have around, and grandkids, too. But honestly it's not how I've ever wanted to spend my time. Bless those that do - I am in awe of them. Parenting seems like the hardest job in the world.
For sure :thumbsup:

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 4:22 pm
by Suliso
We have extremely high standards for parenting now (too high?). Two or three generations ago it wasn't like that.

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:23 pm
by ti-amie
Well at least we know the hip isn't preventing him from living what seems to be his best life...

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 5:38 pm
by ponchi101
That was nine months ago. Maybe THAT'S how he re-injured the hip...
(You started :rofl: :thumbsup: )

Re: Tennis Players Random, Random 2.0

Posted: Fri Mar 12, 2021 6:09 pm
by ti-amie
Good point ponchi. Maybe we should go back and calculate Kim giving birth with his hip issues...(no double entendre intended)