Re: Sports Random, Random
Posted: Sat Nov 20, 2021 2:20 am
Interesting… I don’t remember soccer not being that way (having lots of diving) but I also have no memories of it before the .. 89 ? … World Cup.
We still talk about tennis. And much more.
https://talkabouttennis2.com/
^ It remains, however, that soccer was never intended to be played that way (with the fake injuries). This includes the present day, where doing that is still against the rules. That it is so tolerated and accepted in practice is completely contrary to the spirit, intention, and purpose of the game.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am I know we don't like it in North America...that's not what I'm debating. Outside of North America do people feel like this? Obviously may be harder for you or I to find (or understand) if any articles on it. My thought is many of those "real soccer fans" don't consider it cheating and just consider it part of the game.
^ I did mention that cheating - in various ways - also occurs in other sports. But I maintain that it is significantly more obvious, more frequent, and more accepted in soccer than in any other sport that I can think of. From what I have seen and read, soccer has a much worse reputation for diving/fake injuries than any other organized sport played on this planet. If that is not so, please give examples of other organized sports which have as bad or worse a reputation as soccer for faking injuries.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am The third article reminds me of many cases in professional (North American) football where some similar things are celebrated. If a punter is able to draw contact and make themselves look hurt, they are celebrated for "drawing a penalty" for example. And there are the mentioned fake injuries to stop clock, momentum etc. Perhaps we aren't so different here after all.
^ This is a poor comparison, as hockey was originally designed with body checking being an integral, accepted, and legal part of the game. Therefore, anyone viewing it as cheating is applying their own view of what they think the game 'should' be, according to their personal perspective. This is akin to someone saying that foot faults should be allowed in tennis.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am A good comparison we can relate to is ice hockey - the European game in much different than the North American game. I wonder if many Europeans watch North American ice hockey and think all the body checking and physical contact is cheating. We consider it part of the game. Or anyone who is used to womens hockey where it is almost not tolerated at all... If they grew up watching womens hockey and then watched men's hockey ... they'd probably be just aghast.
^ Anyone can say whatever they wish - and people often do so to support their agenda, and/or to justify their position.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am So we can't really say what "real soccer fans" should feel...only what we ourselves think. We can't necessarily say that a real soccer fan can't accept how the game is....or they could just turn around and tell us we have to accept how it is or we aren't true soccer fans.
^ By that logic, and in keeping with current events, who are we to condemn the Chinese government's censorship and lies? If it is normal and accepted by them, we shouldn't 'impose' our views on them, right?ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am And once again, I will disagree that if something is less popular ...it doesn't makes our opinion matter more or being more objective. That would be similar to say someone in a country with little medical care coming here and saying "my opinions on medicine are more valid than yours since medicine is ... less popular (ok not exactly right words) ... than yours." Or if someone came to this board and said "I don't watch tennis, so my opinions on it are better than everyone's here ". Being invested in something doesn't disqualify you from being able to be subjective about it...especially since you will know it better than the other person.
And that's it. It is not that difficult. It is not considered cheating.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am I know we don't like it in North America...that's not what I'm debating. Outside of North America do people feel like this? Obviously may be harder for you or I to find (or understand) if any articles on it. My thought is many of those "real soccer fans" don't consider it cheating and just consider it part of the game.
...
…which is exactly what you are doing with soccer. That’s the crux of my argument. You are Saying other people can’t use their personal perspective to decide what is cheating… but it is ok for you to do so about soccer.
^ But it IS cheating.ponchi101 wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 3:33 pmAnd that's it. It is not that difficult. It is not considered cheating.ptmcmahon wrote: ↑Sat Nov 20, 2021 4:56 am I know we don't like it in North America...that's not what I'm debating. Outside of North America do people feel like this? Obviously may be harder for you or I to find (or understand) if any articles on it. My thought is many of those "real soccer fans" don't consider it cheating and just consider it part of the game.
...
No, I'm not doing that at all. I'm not the one who is defining it as cheating - soccer's OWN RULE BOOK defines it as cheating. Because the intent of the diving/fake injuries is to give your team an unearned and unfair advantage. That's where the difference lies. If someone calls body checking in hockey 'cheating', the argument holds no water because it is in no way against the rules of hockey. However, if someone calls diving/faking injuries in soccer cheating, it is simply an accurate definition of the circumstance - because it IS cheating according to the rules of soccer.
Don't get me started about the ridiculous residency rules.