Talk About Tennis 2.0

I tried to watch it again a couple of months ago and it was very difficult viewing. Not "Requiem For a Dream" difficult but difficult.

When Brad Pitt says "You are not a beautiful and unique snowflake", it makes me wonder: "What was the casting director thinking?"

I did not know this tidbit about Spare:

"Harry is working with the acclaimed ghostwriter J.R. Moehringer, who won accolades for his work on the autobiography of the tennis player Andre Agassi, and is known for probing the tensions inherent in father-son relationships."

Despite not being interested in the royal family, I have no interest in watching The Crown, etc., this could be a very entertaining read. More likely though I'll just count on TAT to post the interesting stuff.

A new documentary on Hulu that goes into a scandal we previously discussed a bit over in the Religion Thread on TAT 1.0.

gisele bündchen in schiaparelli fw22 couture for v magazine photographed by sølve sundsbø
posted by @MIUCClAMUSE

More on the wedding

You wouldn't believe the meltdown the WH Press Corps is having about these pics that were shot the Thursday before the wedding. Some are equating their being excluded from the actual wedding to TFG's lies about everything. Amazing.

Don't believe they're upset about not being invited to the party?

Ashley Parker
@AshleyRParker
I remain skeptical about Twitter. Also: Senior National Political Correspondent
@washingtonpost
.
@MSNBC
analyst. And fmr WaPo WH Buro Chief;
@nytimes
alum.

After being trolled she posted this:

Ashley Parker
@AshleyRParker

TO BE CLEAR: Not all lies are created equal and the magnitude, frequency and audacity is certainly different. But the Biden WH, for ex, has also waived us off correct reporting about Biden's SCOTUS pick, his Egypt trip, attendees in private meetings, etc.

And there was this:

On the one hand.
I don't think you should hold a wedding at the WH. It is NOT the permanent resident of the Bidens. It is a public property, and it should not be used by the privilege of one family.
On the other.
This must have been a ceremony attended by many important political figures. Holding the wedding at the WH cut on the security nightmare of holding it somewhere else, which would have had a tremendous cost.

ponchi101 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 22, 2022 8:23 pm On the one hand.
I don't think you should hold a wedding at the WH. It is NOT the permanent resident of the Bidens. It is a public property, and it should not be used by the privilege of one family.
On the other.
This must have been a ceremony attended by many important political figures. Holding the wedding at the WH cut on the security nightmare of holding it somewhere else, which would have had a tremendous cost.

If it had been held anywhere else the MAGATs would've caused chaos and put many, many lives in danger.