We are under attack once more. Expect some delays and extra security precautions (your ID may have to be checked)

NBA Random

And other things related to basketball
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 18842
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 4110 times
Been thanked: 6967 times
Contact:

Re: NBA Random

#421

Post by ponchi101 »

Disney's run to own ALL television continues.
That is not good.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 31989
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 6175 times
Been thanked: 4198 times

Honorary_medal

Re: NBA Random

#422

Post by ti-amie »


The NBA got the finish it needed in Game 1 of the NBA Finals, but it was not enough to keep Pacers-Thunder from opening at a non-COVID low.

Thursday’s Pacers-Thunder NBA Finals Game 1 averaged a 4.7 rating and 8.91 million viewers on ABC, marking the lowest rated and least-watched Game 1 of the Finals of the Nielsen people meter era (1988-present) outside of the two COVID-affected series, Bucks-Suns in July 2021 (4.5, 8.70M) and Heat-Lakers in the “bubble” on the final day of September 2020 (4.1, 7.69M).

Indiana’s last-second win, which peaked with 11.07 million during the final minutes, was the least-watched Finals game of any kind since that 2021 opener — and the ninth-least watched in the people-meter era.

Ratings declined 18% and viewership 19% from Mavericks-Celtics last year (5.7, 10.99M). The declines would have been sharper if not for the Pacers’ comeback. Viewership was down 23% from last year until the 10:45 PM ET quarter-hour (from 11.2 to 8.6 million), after which point it increased by 15% over the final minutes of last year’s Boston blowout (from 9.0 to 10.4 million).

With the series pitting the #25 and #47 television markets, expectations were low heading into the Pacers-Thunder series — especially given Oklahoma City’s dominance throughout the NBA season. Even so, as with the Stanley Cup Final the prior night, the Game 1 audience may still have come in under those expectations.

The Thunder looked well on their way to a comfortable Game 1 win until Indiana pulled off yet another fourth quarter comeback, culminating in Tyrese Haliburton’s game-winning shot. If this series is to bounce back in the ratings, the momentum from that shot will have to carry into Sunday’s Game 2.

The only other time this postseason that Oklahoma City lost at home was Game 1 against Denver in the second round, which played out almost identically to Thursday’s Game 1. The Thunder followed that defeat with a 43-point wipeout of the Nuggets in Game 2, an outcome that needless to say that league would need to avoid.

https://www.sportsmediawatch.com/2025/0 ... er-game-1/
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 18842
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 4110 times
Been thanked: 6967 times
Contact:

Re: NBA Random

#423

Post by ponchi101 »

This was expected. There is no way that an OKC/IND series was going to draw a lot of viewers.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 31989
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 6175 times
Been thanked: 4198 times

Honorary_medal

Re: NBA Random

#424

Post by ti-amie »

ponchi101 wrote: Sat Jun 07, 2025 6:02 pm This was expected. There is no way that an OKC/IND series was going to draw a lot of viewers.
The NBA tried to boost interest though. The Commissioner said, and I'm paraphrasing, that if it was the Steelers vs Green Bay no one would be talking about small markets.
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 31989
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 6175 times
Been thanked: 4198 times

Honorary_medal

Re: NBA Random

#425

Post by ti-amie »

Back when the NBA was THEE NBA you went inside at your own peril. Today they stand at the three point line instead. Then again there's no Laimbeer, Rodman, Salley or Jordan out there to take names now.


“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 18842
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 4110 times
Been thanked: 6967 times
Contact:

Re: NBA Random

#426

Post by ponchi101 »

Exactly. Take away the three point shot and there is no way a modern team can beat the teams of the 80's - 90's. They have forgotten how to penetrate.
BTW. You forgot Moses Malone. Dumb sport idea in the 80's: attack the rim with Malone down under. You were going to get bruised. Bad.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 31989
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 6175 times
Been thanked: 4198 times

Honorary_medal

Re: NBA Random

#427

Post by ti-amie »

ponchi101 wrote: Sun Sep 07, 2025 6:16 am Exactly. Take away the three point shot and there is no way a modern team can beat the teams of the 80's - 90's. They have forgotten how to penetrate.
BTW. You forgot Moses Malone. Dumb sport idea in the 80's: attack the rim with Malone down under. You were going to get bruised. Bad.
Do we blame Steph Curry for this? Everybody wants to hit a beautiful three point shot but they ignore that Curry will go inside and take the "beating". It's not just Draymond. Not that going inside today is like going inside against Malone, Laimbeer, Jordan, Rodman or Salley.

Would you say Shaq at his peak was a monster inside too? OMG the name of the Navy man who played for a Texas team won't come to me but what about him? Were they the last of the great defensive centers?
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 18842
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 4110 times
Been thanked: 6967 times
Contact:

Re: NBA Random

#428

Post by ponchi101 »

Robinson. The Admiral.
Shaq could have played at anytime. Personally, Shaq was never a basketball player. He is simply a humongous human being, a man so big that playing this sport was an extension of that.
And yes, blame it on Steph. Everybody thinks they are Steph. Just look at Trae Young. He thinks that because he has hit one or two three from midcourt, he can take that shot whenever he wants.
And just look at the Celtics. No longer playing BB; they are just simply heaving three's. It is the most boring team in the league.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
User avatar
ti-amie United States of America
Posts: 31989
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
Location: The Boogie Down, NY
Has thanked: 6175 times
Been thanked: 4198 times

Honorary_medal

Re: NBA Random

#429

Post by ti-amie »

ponchi101 wrote: Mon Sep 08, 2025 3:35 am Robinson. The Admiral.
Shaq could have played at anytime. Personally, Shaq was never a basketball player. He is simply a humongous human being, a man so big that playing this sport was an extension of that.
And yes, blame it on Steph. Everybody thinks they are Steph. Just look at Trae Young. He thinks that because he has hit one or two three from midcourt, he can take that shot whenever he wants.
And just look at the Celtics. No longer playing BB; they are just simply heaving three's. It is the most boring team in the league.
THANK YOU! His name wouldn't come to me.

And yeah, unfortunately Steph has changed the way the game is played because of his shooting ability. He can and does go inside though and I think would've given as good as he got back in the day but the young'uns don't get that part.

I agree about Trae Young and the Celtics, well I'm a NY'er and after the Lakers the Celtics are my least liked team. :lol:
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
news727 Vietnam
Posts: 46
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2025 10:45 pm
Location: Hanoi
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 9 times

Re: NBA Random

#430

Post by news727 »

First week of 2025-26 season completed. Did not disappoint any day.

- Opening night: OKC won in 2OT, screwing Warriors fans wanting to watch their team on the national stage. SGA dropped 55.
- Wednesday: 8 of 12 home teams won. Wemby dumping 40 on Mavericks (and making it look easy in the process) was a real treat.
- Thursday: OKC won in 2OT, screwing Warriors fans wanting to watch their team on the national stage. Sounds familiar? To make things crazier, that was the ESPN doubleheader and the only games of the night. At least there was ESPNEWS to back things up.
- Friday: Doncic had 49 in win. Curry had 35 in loss. Wizards-Mavs was a rollercoaster, I'll tell you that much.
- Saturday: 76ers barely eked out Hornets. Jokic had a triple-douple in a blowout W.
- Sunday: It was Reaves' turn for a 50-burger, meanwhile Giannis and Jaylen Brown only had a 40-burger each. Guess whose team won it. Lamelo did 38-point trip-doub.

Currently:
- Undefeated: Spurs, Thunder, 76ers, Bulls
- Winless: Celtics, Pelicans, Nets, Rockets, Pacers
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 18842
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 4110 times
Been thanked: 6967 times
Contact:

Re: NBA Random

#431

Post by ponchi101 »

The Spurs are back. It was not only Wemby, the rest of the team has also been playing well.
Not saying The Finals, but they can play well enough to make the playoffs and even the 2nd round. Then, OKC, Den or GSW will await, and it may be a bit too much, still.
I know, too early in the season but us Spurs' fans may have some fun this year.
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests