Page 46 of 47

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:31 pm
by ti-amie
More details:












The video of his assault on his then girlfriend Cassie Ventura is...something.

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:34 pm
by ti-amie
P2/2







Inner City Press
@innercitypress

Agnifilo: The March 25 raids were frightening - lasers pointed at his children, they were marched out of the front of the house, with news reporters and helicopters. Handcuffed for two hours, completely innocent. We did not want that to happen again

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:46 pm
by ti-amie
This video wasn't deleted. Violence.

https://x.com/TheSGTJoker/status/1836014092093378720

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:49 pm
by ti-amie
The thing is everyone in NYC knew how bad this man was. It goes back to when JLo lied for him enabling him to beat a weapons rap I think. There was the incident at CCNY (City College of NY) where he oversold an event and people were trampled to death.

There was only one person who never let him intimidate her and that was a local DJ named Wendy Williams. She later brought her gossip show to television. She was called a liar, etc., but he never sued her.

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Sep 17, 2024 10:52 pm
by ti-amie
And of course MAGA weighing in loud and wrong.


Readers added context
This is Montel Williams, not Sean Combs.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Montel_Wi…
Do you find this helpful?

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2024 9:49 pm
by ti-amie

Diddy Denied bail AGAIN
Dumpster fire
The untreated MRSA infection currently known as Diddy (né Puffy) appealed his denial for bail today. He requested to be put on ankle monitored house arrest and pay a $50 million (almost entirely) secured bond. He offered to hire a private security company with 1 or 2 personnel monitoring his residence at all times. (Even three of they really had to!) And Diddy would give up his cellphone and the Internet.

Diddy is the definition of a flight risk and appears to have been committing obstruction of justice when he knew he was about to be arrested so the new judge stamped a big fat DENIED on that request and said the proposed bail package was "insufficient even in the risk of flight."

Inner City Press's live tweets of the hearing, my summary below (it's technically shorter):

Diddy is claiming that the reason he followed Cassie into the hotel hallway (and beat her too, I guess?), is because he thought she had taken his clothes.

(If you have an entourage that can buy you an unholy amount of lube and baby oil at a moment's notice, they can get you some new damn clothes.)

The prosecution: "The defense is arguing that anyone in a freak-off wanted to be there. That's not the law. When people are threatened with exposure, and are beaten, they cannot consent. That is trafficking. Victims' heads were slammed against car windows."

A message a victim sent to Diddy: "when you get (expletive) up, you knock me around. I'm not a rag doll. I'm someone's child."

Extra details the prosecution revealed: The drugs that were used to get the victims to continue the freak offs were "GBH, ketamine, and others." They have documentation of communication between Diddy and victims that supports the claim that he blackmailed and drugged his victims.

Diddy contacted one witness that had been given a subpoena to testify 14 times before they testified. He also contacted a witness he hasn't been in contact with in several years after the grand jury subpoena. And he wiretapped someone.

He called a victim and tried to convince her everything has been consensual. He repeatedly said he knew he wasn't supposed to be speaking to her in the phone. He offered to pay her off. (Shortly after this the judge basically told the prosecution they had hit a point of diminishing returns for the hearing and they should wrap it up.)

The defense seems to confirm that Kalenna Harper is a witness. They say that the reason Diddy called her 54 times in one day before she made a statement about his latest lawsuit was because she was worried about the press and he was trying to comfort her.

Diddy's defense attorney trying to argue that Diddy is trustworthy: "We have a letter of intend to sell his airplane. We had 3 buyers who didn't work out."

Judge: "Can you get to the point?"

When the defense argues that everything that happened with Cassie was consensual and what happened is truly tragic because they were in love:

Judge: "What does that have to do with him punching her, throwing a vase at her - what's love got to do with that?"

Defense: "That was jealousy from infidelity- in both directions, Mr. Combs & this other person. The violence is from that."

Judge: "What is your point? And you say, they invited a third person in - if that person is a commercial sex worker, and they travel across state lines, isn't that a problem?"

The defense can sense this is going terribly since the judge was probably fighting back and eyeroll, so they bring up that Diddy was a literal alter boy.

Judge: "How far back are you going?"

Defense: "He watches a sermon every day."
Image

The drugging and abuse done by Combs apparently involves both men and women.

They've also taken the passports of all of his family members.

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Wed Sep 18, 2024 9:50 pm
by ti-amie
I know a man who taught him at the prestigious boys Catholic School Mount St Michael's. I think of him every time some horror story comes out about Combs.

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 8:38 pm
by ti-amie




Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Wed Oct 09, 2024 10:24 pm
by ponchi101
The government of Venezuela does not have $25MM to put on anybody's head.
And they have close ties to the FARC, so their killers got at a discount.

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2024 10:17 pm
by ti-amie



Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:45 pm
by mmmm8
I used to work with my office window overlooking their NYC flagship around 2006-2008 (during his tenure). Shirtless chiseled young male models made to stand outside greeting customers even in some of the colder months.

If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck....

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2024 12:25 am
by skatingfan
mmmm8 wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:45 pm I used to work with my office window overlooking their NYC flagship around 2006-2008 (during his tenure). Shirtless chiseled young male models made to stand outside greeting customers even in some of the colder months.

If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck....
I read this out of context of what we were talking about most recently in this thread, and I thought it was about Rudy Giuliani. :lol:

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 25, 2024 12:48 pm
by mmmm8
skatingfan wrote: Fri Oct 25, 2024 12:25 am
mmmm8 wrote: Thu Oct 24, 2024 2:45 pm I used to work with my office window overlooking their NYC flagship around 2006-2008 (during his tenure). Shirtless chiseled young male models made to stand outside greeting customers even in some of the colder months.

If it looks like a duck and it walks like a duck....
I read this out of context of what we were talking about most recently in this thread, and I thought it was about Rudy Giuliani. :lol:
I would have said "scantily clad cousins" then :D

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2024 10:03 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Legal Random, Random

Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2024 9:38 pm
by ti-amie
Teddy Schleifer
@teddyschleifer
We're on hour three of the Elon Musk super PAC lottery lawsuit in a court in Philadelphia.

Larry Krasner has been testifying that the entire premise of the Musk lottery was a "scam" and a "grift" and "disingenuous."

The Musk team has been arguing that this was not a "lottery" because its $1 million winners were actually pre-selected based on whom would be the best spokespeople for the super PAC. Team Musk says their winners were not "random."

marty
@MartyBurns74
·
2h
So their argument is they committed fraud?
BrickmanInGA
@BrickmanInGA
·
2h
This is pretty stunning, actually. They're admitting in court that it was fraud to advertise "winners selected at random". Now we'll see if the US judicial system has any desire to indict the wealthy/powerful/white felons.