Talk About Tennis 2.0

More about Christina Bobb who was apparently not told when growing up never to sign something you haven't read and asked questions about.

But, what would you expect FROM a lawyer that agreed to work for Tiny? Brilliance? Academic excellency?

ponchi101 wrote: ↑Mon Oct 10, 2022 9:21 pm But, what would you expect FROM a lawyer that agreed to work for Tiny? Brilliance? Academic excellency?

Common sense? I know, I know, that's asking alot.

Asha Rangappa @AshaRangappa_
Replying to
@steve_vladeck and @MSNBCDaily
Steve you’ve explained this before but under what circumstances would a justice act on an application alone (to grant) and what is the likelihood here because…Thomas

US supreme court rejects Trump appeal in Mar-a-Lago documents case
Former president requested independent arbiter to vet more than 100 documents marked classified seized from his Florida home

Reuters
Thu 13 Oct 2022 20.12 BST

The US supreme court on Thursday rejected Donald Trump’s bid to let an independent arbiter vet more than 100 classified documents that were seized from his Florida home as he confronts a criminal investigation into his handling of sensitive government records.

The justices, in a brief order, denied Trump’s emergency request that he made on 4 October asking them to lift a federal appeals court’s decision that prevented the arbiter from reviewing more than 100 documents marked as classified that were among the roughly 11,000 records seized by FBI agents at his Mar-a-Lago estate in Palm Beach on 8 August.

There were no publicly noted dissents by any of the nine justices to the decision, which came two days after the justice department urged them to deny Trump’s request and keep the classified documents out of the hands of the arbiter, known as a special master.

The court has a 6-3 conservative majority, including three justices appointed by Trump, who left office in January 2021.

Federal officials obtained a court-approved warrant to search Trump’s residence after suspecting that not all classified documents in his possession had been returned after his presidency ended.

Investigators searched for evidence of potential crimes related to unlawfully retaining national defense information and obstructing a federal investigation. Trump has denied wrongdoing and has called the investigation politically motivated.

Trump went to court on 22 August in a bid to restrict justice department access to the documents as it pursues a criminal investigation.


https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/202 ... ments-case

What was that about the RW and TFG creating their own version of Twitter?





Grifters gonna grift.

Yes, grifters gonna grift, but this man has carte blanche to grift because he does everything in the open, AND NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. He really is above the laws of the USA.

ponchi101 wrote: ↑Sat Oct 15, 2022 11:56 pm Yes, grifters gonna grift, but this man has carte blanche to grift because he does everything in the open, AND NOTHING EVER HAPPENS. He really is above the laws of the USA.

It's twilight zone esque. Truly baffles me.