Page 7 of 62

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:15 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:21 pm
by ponchi101
Serious here.
I know twitter is a built brand, and it is the largest of its kind. But Elon is not a technological ingenue. Why didn't he start a similar platform, with some different gizmos? If he was able to take on the automotive industry and the rocket industry, this thing was feasible.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:39 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:41 pm
by ti-amie
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Oct 06, 2022 9:21 pm Serious here.
I know twitter is a built brand, and it is the largest of its kind. But Elon is not a technological ingenue. Why didn't he start a similar platform, with some different gizmos? If he was able to take on the automotive industry and the rocket industry, this thing was feasible.
The RW has set up alternate Twitter like platforms and they've failed miserably. Users are already saying if Musk takes over they're out. It may not seem like it but it's been a much saner place since TFG was kicked out.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 12:51 am
by ti-amie

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:58 am
by ponchi101
They haven't delivered the pick up truck.
They never delivered the roadster.
That is a very good point.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 1:44 pm
by Owendonovan
I think once Musk lets the racist, homophobic, misogynist, orange thing back on twitter, the stock tanks. Why would anyone with a hint of morals want to share any kind of platform with him?

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 07, 2022 2:18 pm
by ponchi101
70 million people might.
He is still the leader of a cult. Sadly.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 21, 2022 1:13 am
by ti-amie

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 10:18 pm
by ti-amie

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2022 10:24 pm
by ti-amie
Meta's value has plunged by $700 billion. Wall Street calls it a "train wreck."
moneywatch
BY AIMEE PICCHI

OCTOBER 27, 2022 / 2:45 PM / MONEYWATCH

Facebook parent Meta Platforms is making a huge investment in virtual reality, but its actual reality is looking like a real disaster.

Meta shares tumbled 24% on Thursday to its lowest level in nearly four years following an earnings report that one Wall Street analyst described as a "train wreck." It's a far cry from the company's position nearly a year ago, when CEO Mark Zuckerberg on October 28, 2021, announced with great fanfare that Facebook was changing its name to Meta Platforms to emphasize its focus on the "metaverse."

Last fall, Facebook was still riding high: Its market value reached a peak of more than $1 trillion in September 2021. Revenue and profits were surging as advertisers flocked to Facebook and Instagram to reach their billions of users.

To be sure, practically the entire tech industry has taken a beating this year, but Meta's stock plunge has far outpaced the overall sector, with its shares down 67% from a year earlier compared with the tech-heavy Nasdaq's 31% slide over the same period. Meta's plunge translates into an eye-popping loss of about $700 billion in market value.

On Thursday, Meta's market value sank to $268 billion, down from more than $1 trillion in September of 2021.

The company's travails raise questions about its all-in bet on the metaverse, as well as whether the social media company could suffer the fate of other major businesses whose gambles on the future failed to pay off. In the near-term, Meta's core Facebook business is facing challenges as the economy slows and advertisers trim spending.

"Meta's results last night was an absolute train wreck that speaks to pervasive digital advertising doldrums ahead for Zuckerberg & Co. as they make the risky and head scratching bet on the metaverse," Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said in a report.

Here are three key issues slamming Meta shares and deepening questions about its longer-term prospects.

$9.4 billion in metaverse losses
On a Wednesday conference call to discuss Meta's latest earnings, Zuckerberg told investors he is "pretty confident this is going in a good direction."

Investors aren't convinced. The company is making what amounts to a wildly expensive bet on its ability to transform into a virtual reality behemoth and whether that technology can power the next phase in Meta's growth.

Although such strategic pivots can take years for big companies to execute — as it did for IBM and Microsoft as they morphed from selling hardware to software — the early returns for Meta have been grim. For the first nine months of the year, Meta lost $9.4 billion on its metaverse unit, Reality Labs. It expects the unit to have "significantly" wider operating losses in 2023, the company said on Wednesday.

Investors are skeptical because, at least so far, consumers aren't exactly flocking to the fledgling metaverse. Unlike the longer time-lines for building businesses common in Silicon Valley, Wall Street values companies based on near-term returns rather than hazier projections that stretch years into the future.

Horizon Worlds, Meta's new virtual space, trimmed its goal for monthly active users to 280,000 from 500,000, but the space is attracting fewer than 200,000, the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month.

"nvestors should remain on the sidelines as it will take many years before progress in the metaverse can be truly monetized," Angelo Zino, senior equity analyst CFRA Research, told investors in a research note.

Slower Facebook growth
By comparison, Facebook had a massive base of 1.98 billion active daily users on average for September — a 3% increase from a year ago.

That may seem respectable, but it's far from the huge growth Facebook experienced in earlier years. And the slower growth comes after Facebook in February said it had lost users for the first time in its history.

The social media juggernaut, Meta's huge moneymaker, is battling challenges from upstarts like TikTok, which is grabbing younger consumers.

Advertising challenges

Meta's lifeblood is the advertising revenue booked by Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, with businesses eager to reach their billions daily users. But its ad revenue fell in the most recent quarter, with sales drooping 3.7% and adding to investor concerns.

On the ad front, Meta faces a double whammy. An economic slowdown means that advertisers are cutting spending, with the company on Wednesday pointing to an "uncertain and volatile macroeconomic landscape" for ads. The company is also grappling with the impact of Apple's privacy changes to apps that run on its devices. That change means consumers can ask apps to not track them, and which Facebook has said will cost it $10 billion this year.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/meta-stock ... ost-value/

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 6:10 am
by Suliso
Facebook will slowly wither in my opinion. Doesn't apply to its sister businesses WhatsApp and Instagram, but can they really generate the same revenue? I doubt it.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2022 4:18 pm
by ponchi101
WhatsApp has become such an important tool in trade and business, not to mention, international calling, that if META were to go belly up (and I am not saying it could) the effects would be felt.
IG has also become a very important marketing tool. It would have effects.
But I am not sure how they can monetize them; I am sure that if people were to be charged for using WA we would slowly stop using it.

Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Tue Nov 01, 2022 12:01 am
by ti-amie



Re: Business/Markets/Stocks/Economics Random, Random

Posted: Wed Nov 02, 2022 7:55 pm
by ponchi101
Inflation, high food prices, markets collapsing, a lot of countries having issues trying to balance budgets and still provide for basic needs.
And, except in the USA, shrinking job markets. Tough times for almost everybody.
ALMOST everybody.
The Über Rich are doing so well, Bentley has doubled profits while only selling 3% more units. How? Customization. You not only want to have a Bentley; you want to have a unique Bentley.

Bentley CEO: ‘Never seen spending patterns’ like this before with luxury consumer

I really don't know how to feel about this.