Ex-‘MAGA Granny’ is turning down Trump’s pardon of her Jan. 6 conviction
She was at the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. She pleaded guilty. Now, she doesn’t want President Donald Trump’s pardon because she wants to own what she did.
January 22, 2025 at 4:20 p.m. EST Today at 4:20 p.m. EST
Pamela Hemphill, who served a federal prison sentence for her role in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot. (Matt Kelley/AP)
By Ben Brasch
A woman who once called herself the “MAGA Granny” has spent the past few years criticizing Donald Trump after she was sentenced to 60 days in prison for being part of the mob that stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.
Now Pamela Hemphill from Boise, Idaho, will decline the pardon that Trump offered her and other Jan. 6 convicts during the first hours of his second term, she told The Washington Post.
“I don’t want to be a part of them trying to rewrite history. It was an insurrection that day,” Hemphill said Tuesday, the day after Trump issued the pardons.
Hemphill, 71, is giving up the chance to clear her name, and she said she will remain on federal probation for nine more months. She pleaded guilty, according to court documents, to violent entry or disorderly conduct on Capitol grounds. She said she served 60 days at a federal prison in California in 2022.
It is exceedingly rare for someone to reject a pardon, said Erica Zunkel, director of the Criminal and Juvenile Justice Clinic at the University of Chicago Law School.
“The reasons underlying what she did are truly of a different time and of a different political atmosphere, and really stands in stark contrast to how other people who got commutations and pardons for Jan. 6 stuff have very much leaned into ‘I did nothing wrong,’” Zunkel said.
Hemphill said she knows what she did was wrong. The evidence backs her up.
A week and a half after the riot, an FBI agent wrote in a court filing, a tipster sent a screenshot of a late December 2020 post from Hemphill that read: “It’s not going to be a FUN Trump Rally that is planned for January 6th, its a WAR!”
Another post showed the self-proclaimed “MAGA Granny” holding a large firearm, with a caption saying she was on her way to Washington for Jan. 6, when Trump scheduled a rally that coincided with Congress’s certification of the electoral college vote count confirming his election loss, the FBI agent wrote.
The FBI also said it found YouTube footage of Hemphill from a Jan. 5, 2021, event co-hosted by right-wing conspiracy theorist Alex Jones. In the video, the agent wrote, Hemphill can be heard saying she would try to get into the Capitol. “Keep an eye on me tomorrow,” she allegedly said.
That next day, Hemphill passed through barriers at the Capitol as other rioters pushed against them. An officer told her to go back. As she did, a prosecutor wrote in a court document, she encouraged others to break through: “You just gotta come in. … It’s your house. Come on in.”
At the Capitol steps, Hemphill was again at the front of the group when it reached the police barricades, the prosecutor wrote. She fell to her knees, and an officer helped her up.
She entered the Capitol at 3:01 p.m. through the East Rotunda doors, filming her progress along the way. The prosecutor wrote that Hemphill left nine minutes later, asking an officer to help her out, “claiming fear of injury from the crowd, and the officer escorted her out.”
Hemphill left the Capitol grounds only after other rioters told her that Trump had tweeted that they should go home. “When Trump says something, I listen,” Hemphill allegedly said.
That isn’t the case anymore.
Hemphill, who retired about 10 years ago after three decades as a drug and alcohol counselor, was a lifelong Republican — except when she voted for Barack Obama in 2008, citing how he would make history as America’s first Black president.
Hemphill said her family persuaded her to start supporting Trump. She noted that Trump wasn’t the first cult-of-personality figure she had fallen in with, saying she demonstrated with anti-government activist Ammon Bundy at the Idaho Capitol.
She said she was unnerved by Trump’s rhetoric in the “Access Hollywood” video, in which he bragged about sexually assaulting women. But, she said, her family told her that Trump would keep America from falling into a communist regime.
Hemphill said she didn’t watch the news, and she trusted her family.
“Trump was the father figure coming in to protect your children,” she recalled of her former thinking. “… He set himself up to become a savior.”
Hemphill said she found out about Trump’s pardon Monday while on air with CNN’s Abby Phillip.
When Phillip asked if she would take the pardon, Hemphill said she was still processing but added: “Oh, no, that would be an insult to our Capitol Police officers and the rule of law. I broke the law. I pleaded guilty because I was guilty.”
Hemphill said she then emailed her attorney Nathan I. Silver II, who confirmed she had received a pardon. She said her first response was, “What do I do to get off the pardon?”
She said Silver told her they would write a letter to the federal Office of the Pardon Attorney saying she was turning down the pardon. Silver declined to comment to The Post.
“Pardons themselves are fairly rare … given the size of the federal criminal justice system,” said Jacob Schuman, an associate professor at Temple University’s Beasley School of Law.
Schuman, who previously worked as a federal defense lawyer in Philadelphia, said he had never heard of anybody convicted of a crime turning down a pardon.
Hemphill has drawn widespread praise for her transparency and acceptance of responsibility for her role at the insurrection.
“When you’re alone by yourself, you know what’s right. I can’t allow somebody else to tell me what I think I should do,” she said.
A big factor, she said, was her therapist serving a hard truth: “You were not a victim, you were a volunteer.”
She said she didn’t want to go back to that therapist after hearing that — until she realized the therapist was correct.
Hemphill said she will continue her advocacy. She has done a slew of interviews speaking out against what happened four years ago.
“I can never make it right, but hopefully I can share enough of my story where people maybe will start thinking about it and get away from the MAGA cult. You never know, you just plant the seeds,” she said.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2 ... n6-pardon/
Legal Random, Random
- ti-amie
- Posts: 27949
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
- Location: The Boogie Down, NY
- Has thanked: 5826 times
- Been thanked: 3831 times
-
Honorary_medal
Re: Legal Random, Random
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
- ti-amie
- Posts: 27949
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
- Location: The Boogie Down, NY
- Has thanked: 5826 times
- Been thanked: 3831 times
-
Honorary_medal
Re: Legal Random, Random
Meanwhile
Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Maybe more people would remember this from Rhodes’s trial if the court allowed it to be televised. Maybe not.
Print journalists like @rparloff.bsky.social provided unflinching coverage of that trial.
It’s bizarre to see how easily history can be forgotten when only a few are there to witness it.
Anna Bower
@annabower.bsky.social
Maybe more people would remember this from Rhodes’s trial if the court allowed it to be televised. Maybe not.
Print journalists like @rparloff.bsky.social provided unflinching coverage of that trial.
It’s bizarre to see how easily history can be forgotten when only a few are there to witness it.
Anna Bower @annabower.bsky.social
·
49m
On Jan. 6, just after his fellow Oath Keepers entered the Capitol in a military-stack formation, Rhodes received a message from a rioter. Members of Congress must be “(expletive) their pants inside,” the message read.
Rhodes replied: “Amen. They need to (expletive) their (expletive) pants.”
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
- ti-amie
- Posts: 27949
- Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 4:44 pm
- Location: The Boogie Down, NY
- Has thanked: 5826 times
- Been thanked: 3831 times
-
Honorary_medal
Re: Legal Random, Random
Trump administration fires DOJ officials who worked on criminal investigations of the president
The DOJ employees had been involved in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation that led to Trump's classified documents and Jan. 6 cases.
Jan. 27, 2025, 4:28 PM EST
By Ken Dilanian and Ryan J. Reilly
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department said Monday that it fired several career lawyers involved in prosecuting Donald Trump, escalating the president's campaign of retribution against his perceived enemies.
The employees worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation that led to now-dismissed indictments against Trump over his handling of classified documents and his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“Today, Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump," a Justice Department official told NBC News. "In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda. This action is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government."
Among those let go, an official familiar with the matter told NBC News, were career prosecutors Molly Gaston, J.P. Cooney, Anne McNamara and Mary Dohrmann.
Smith resigned earlier this month ahead of Trump's inauguration. Trump's re-election effectively ended the federal criminal cases against him due to the Justice Department's long-standing policies against prosecuting a sitting president.
Trump's New York hush money case, brought by Manhattan Attorney General Alvin Bragg, is the sole case criminal case against Trump to lead to a conviction. Trump was sentenced earlier this month to penalty-free unconditional discharge, making him the first convicted felon to assume the presidency.
The only pending trial, the election interference case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, was stymied indefinitely after Willis was booted from the case in December due to conflict of interest allegations.
Trump said throughout the 2024 campaign that all of the investigations were improper and politically motivated "witch hunts." He said that Democrats had "weaponized" the Justice Department and tried to use it to undermine his re-election bid.
Hours after his inauguration, Trump issued an executive order “ending the weaponization of the federal government,” that calls for a series
Former Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel Smith repeatedly denied that the investigations were politically motivated. They said that Trump's own actions resulted in the criminal probes of his role in the January 6th riot and his failure to return classified documents to the National Archives.
Former Justice Department officials and legal experts have long argued that Trump should not retaliate against career civil servants who were simply doing their job and, in some cases, assigned to the investigation. They said that retaliating against the career prosecutors who worked on the Trump cases would have a chilling effect on the DOJ workforce and undermine future investigations of improper acts by public officials.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
“He’s playing with the casino’s money, with house money,” one Justice Department official told NBC News. "Whatever the government has to pay out, if any rights are found to have been violated, it’ll pale in comparison. It’s a price he’s willing to have the government pay."
The letter sent to the employees who were fired specifically cited their role in investigating Trump. “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” the letter said, according to portions read to NBC News. “The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates. Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implement the president's agenda faithfully.”
The letter sent to the employees who were fired specifically cited their role in investigating Trump. “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” the letter said, according to portions read to NBC News. “The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates. Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implement the president's agenda faithfully.”
The letter acknowledges that the employees may appeal this decision to the federal Merit Systems Protection Board, which adjudicates the discipline of federal employees.
Career civil servants can’t just be summarily fired — a legal process will unfold.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
Former DOJ lawyer Julie Zebrak, an expert in federal employment law, said career civil servants cannot be summarily fired.
“They have civil service rights. They have due process rights,” she said.
If the Justice Department is arguing that these lawyers are not performing properly, they must be subject to what’s known as progressive discipline, she said, including warnings and notice. They must be allowed to hire lawyers before they lose their jobs.
“There is a reason people say it’s so hard to fire federal employees,” she said.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justic ... rcna189512
The DOJ employees had been involved in special counsel Jack Smith’s investigation that led to Trump's classified documents and Jan. 6 cases.
Jan. 27, 2025, 4:28 PM EST
By Ken Dilanian and Ryan J. Reilly
WASHINGTON — The Justice Department said Monday that it fired several career lawyers involved in prosecuting Donald Trump, escalating the president's campaign of retribution against his perceived enemies.
The employees worked on Special Counsel Jack Smith's investigation that led to now-dismissed indictments against Trump over his handling of classified documents and his efforts to overturn his 2020 election loss in the lead-up to the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol.
“Today, Acting Attorney General James McHenry terminated the employment of a number of DOJ officials who played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump," a Justice Department official told NBC News. "In light of their actions, the Acting Attorney General does not trust these officials to assist in faithfully implementing the President’s agenda. This action is consistent with the mission of ending the weaponization of government."
Among those let go, an official familiar with the matter told NBC News, were career prosecutors Molly Gaston, J.P. Cooney, Anne McNamara and Mary Dohrmann.
Smith resigned earlier this month ahead of Trump's inauguration. Trump's re-election effectively ended the federal criminal cases against him due to the Justice Department's long-standing policies against prosecuting a sitting president.
Trump's New York hush money case, brought by Manhattan Attorney General Alvin Bragg, is the sole case criminal case against Trump to lead to a conviction. Trump was sentenced earlier this month to penalty-free unconditional discharge, making him the first convicted felon to assume the presidency.
The only pending trial, the election interference case brought by Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, was stymied indefinitely after Willis was booted from the case in December due to conflict of interest allegations.
Trump said throughout the 2024 campaign that all of the investigations were improper and politically motivated "witch hunts." He said that Democrats had "weaponized" the Justice Department and tried to use it to undermine his re-election bid.
Hours after his inauguration, Trump issued an executive order “ending the weaponization of the federal government,” that calls for a series
Former Attorney General Merrick Garland and Special Counsel Smith repeatedly denied that the investigations were politically motivated. They said that Trump's own actions resulted in the criminal probes of his role in the January 6th riot and his failure to return classified documents to the National Archives.
Former Justice Department officials and legal experts have long argued that Trump should not retaliate against career civil servants who were simply doing their job and, in some cases, assigned to the investigation. They said that retaliating against the career prosecutors who worked on the Trump cases would have a chilling effect on the DOJ workforce and undermine future investigations of improper acts by public officials.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
“He’s playing with the casino’s money, with house money,” one Justice Department official told NBC News. "Whatever the government has to pay out, if any rights are found to have been violated, it’ll pale in comparison. It’s a price he’s willing to have the government pay."
The letter sent to the employees who were fired specifically cited their role in investigating Trump. “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” the letter said, according to portions read to NBC News. “The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates. Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implement the president's agenda faithfully.”
The letter sent to the employees who were fired specifically cited their role in investigating Trump. “You played a significant role in prosecuting President Trump,” the letter said, according to portions read to NBC News. “The proper functioning of government critically depends on the trust superior officials place in their subordinates. Given your significant role in prosecuting the president, I do not believe that the leadership of the department can trust you to assist in implement the president's agenda faithfully.”
The letter acknowledges that the employees may appeal this decision to the federal Merit Systems Protection Board, which adjudicates the discipline of federal employees.
Career civil servants can’t just be summarily fired — a legal process will unfold.
“Firing prosecutors because of cases they were assigned to work on is just unacceptable,” said former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an NBC News legal contributor. “It’s anti-rule of law, it’s anti-democracy.”
Former DOJ lawyer Julie Zebrak, an expert in federal employment law, said career civil servants cannot be summarily fired.
“They have civil service rights. They have due process rights,” she said.
If the Justice Department is arguing that these lawyers are not performing properly, they must be subject to what’s known as progressive discipline, she said, including warnings and notice. They must be allowed to hire lawyers before they lose their jobs.
“There is a reason people say it’s so hard to fire federal employees,” she said.
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/justic ... rcna189512
“Do not grow old, no matter how long you live. Never cease to stand like curious children before the Great Mystery into which we were born.” Albert Einstein
- dryrunguy
- Posts: 1697
- Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:31 am
- Has thanked: 755 times
- Been thanked: 1237 times
Re: Legal Random, Random
The NY Times is reporting former U.S. Senator Robert Menendez has been sentenced to 11 years in prison after being convicted last year on corruption charges.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest