Trump, Hegseth lecture military leaders in rare, politically charged summit
The unusual, hastily organized event became a forum for the president and his defense secretary to tout their partisan agenda.
Updated
September 30, 2025 at 6:57 p.m. EDTtoday at 6:57 p.m. EDT
Military leaders await the start of President Donald Trump's speech at Marine Corps Base Quantico, in Virginia, on Tuesday. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
By Dan Lamothe
,
Tara Copp
and
Alex Horton
Hundreds of the U.S. military’s top leaders listened in silence to highly partisan addresses from President Donald Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday, with each harshly criticizing their predecessors and hyping their political objectives during an extraordinary exhibition of both men’s grievances.
The event, organized by Hegseth’s team at the Pentagon, summoned generals and admirals from their command posts throughout the world to Marine Corps Base Quantico, in Virginia, about 30 miles south of Washington. Gen. Dan Caine, Trump’s hand-selected chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told attendees in his opening comments that the event was an “unprecedented opportunity and honor” for the assembled senior officers and their top enlisted advisers to hear directly from the military’s civilian leadership.
Trump, with an eager Cabinet official now in charge at the Pentagon, has repeatedly and unapologetically trampled on long-standing norms intended to keep the American military beyond the grasp of partisan politics. But Tuesday’s presentation stood apart as perhaps the most explicit demonstration to date of this administration’s wholesale disregard for such principles.
Trump, in meandering remarks stretching roughly 70 minutes, joked that if those in attendance did not like what he had to say, they could leave the room — but “there goes your rank, there goes your future,” he added, drawing uncomfortable laughter from some. Since Trump returned to power, he and Hegseth have fired numerous generals and admirals, often without cause, while focusing on a disproportionate number of women and others whom the president and the defense secretary alike have accused broadly of espousing a harmful “woke” ideology centered on enhancing the military’s diversity and inclusivity.
The president defended his polarizing use of the armed forces to police American cities, decrying what he said was “the enemy within” while insisting that he should be allowed to use military force domestically. The Pentagon, he said, should be able to use those cities as “training grounds” — a sentiment certain to draw alarm from state and local officials as he orders deployments that already have prompted lawsuits.
Trump also extolled his decision to rebrand the Defense Department as the Department of War, lamented his inability to end the conflict in Ukraine and tacitly acknowledged the highly sensitive movements of U.S. submarines off the coast of Russia.
“I call it the ‘n-word,’” the president said of the submarines, appearing to allude to the vessels’ nuclear power. “There are two n-words, and you can’t use either of them.”
The assembled military brass sat through the presentations mostly silent, in keeping with the military’s nonpartisan tradition. Peter Feaver, a political scientist at Duke University, said that they “managed well a very difficult walk along a high wire” by listening respectfully to both speeches without responding. Trump and Hegseth, he added, also deserve credit for appearing to show that they understand why the military leaders were remaining quiet.
“The speeches raised a lot of questions that the military will have to grapple with in the months ahead,” Feaver said. “But they won’t have to do so on live TV, and so a very tricky moment in American civil-military relations did not produce the disaster that some feared.”
A former Pentagon official and expert on civil-military affairs, Kori Schake, took a dimmer view.
“It was disgraceful to subject military leaders to so flagrantly partisan political theater and dangerous for the commander in chief to encourage them to violence against fellow Americans,” said Schake, a senior fellow with the American Enterprise Institute.
Trump was introduced by Hegseth, whose fiery warmup act for the president at times relied on profanity and crass, inflammatory language. “To our enemies: FAFO,” he said, using an abbreviation that means “f--- around, find out.”
The Pentagon chief had planned the event without expecting that the president would be involved, issuing a mysterious order last week summoning all senior military commanders and their enlisted aides to Virginia but providing them with no information about the itinerary. The order, first reported by The Washington Post on Thursday, alarmed some after the firing of so many generals and admirals this year.
During his remarks Tuesday, Hegseth, a former Fox News personality who served as an Army officer in the National Guard, lectured the men and women — each with decades more military experience — seated before him. He vowed to make the military “stronger, tougher, faster, fiercer and more powerful than it has ever been before,” repeating numerous talking points he has used throughout his tenure atop the Pentagon — including that the military brass needs to crack down on standards such as physical fitness, grooming and discipline.
The secretary blamed “foolish and reckless politicians” for allowing the military to stray from its primary focus — to fight and win wars — and pledged to fix what he called “decades of decay” in the force. He also declared that “politically correct and overbearing rules of engagement,” the guidelines that shape how U.S. troops use lethal force in combat, are gone.
He also forecast additional firings, saying “more leadership changes will be made, of that I am certain.” He name-checked three retired officers — Gens. Peter Chiarelli, Kenneth “Frank” McKenzie and Mark A. Milley — as the kinds of officers he wants “out.”
The decision to cite those three men seemed personal: Chiarelli, who retired as the Army’s No. 2 officer in 2012, reprimanded Hegseth’s former brigade commander in Iraq, Col. Michael Steele, following a war-crimes investigation that scrutinized soldiers in their unit. McKenzie and Milley had leadership roles during the chaotic U.S. evacuation from Afghanistan in 2021 and have become political targets for the Trump administration.
Milley declined to comment, and McKenzie could not be reached. Chiarelli, in an email, said he is “honored to be put in the same sentence” as Milley and McKenzie and called them “two of the finest leaders I have ever served with.”
Hegseth cited the Gulf War — in which U.S. troops and allies beat back an Iraqi invasion and annexation of neighboring Kuwait within months, from 1990 to 1991 — as an example of a conflict that he sees as a model for the United States. He characterized it as a “limited mission with overwhelming force and a clear end state.”
He also cited President Ronald Reagan’s buildup of the U.S. military in the 1980s as playing a significant role and noted that many military leaders then drew on combat experience from Vietnam.
“The same holds true today,” Hegseth said. “Our civilian and military leadership is chock full of veterans from Iraq and Afghanistan who say ‘never again’ to nation-building and nebulous end states. This clear-eyed view all the way in the White House, combined with President Trump’s military buildup, postures us for future victories.”
Hegseth said he will overhaul the channels troops and civilian employees have available to them to anonymously file whistleblower complaints, report toxic leadership or point out unequal treatment based on race, gender, sexuality or religion.
“No more frivolous complaints. No more anonymous complaints, no more repeat complaints, no more smearing reputations, no more endless waiting, no more legal limbo, no more sidetracking careers. No more walking on eggshells,” Hegseth pronounced. “Of course, being a racist has been illegal in our formations since 1948. The same goes for sexual harassment. Both are wrong and illegal.”
Upholding high standards, Hegseth declared, “is not toxic,” decrying what he said has been a “bastardization” of phrases like “toxic leader.” The Pentagon, he said, will undertake a review of such phrases, empowering military officials to “enforce standards without fear of retribution or second guessing.”
Hegseth also questioned how standards have been shifted to accommodate women, saying those associated with jobs in combat specialties, in particular, must remain high. “If women can make it, excellent. If not, it is what it is,” he said.
Marine Corps leaders listen as Hegseth addresses the military's top generals and admirals on Tuesday. (Kevin Lamarque/Reuters)
Hegseth condemned “fat troops,” including “fat generals and admirals in the halls of the Pentagon,” saying it’s a “bad look.” Everyone, he said, will be required to pass a physical fitness test, and meet height and weight requirements twice a year from now on. He cited his own “hard” fitness routine as something to emulate.
Hegseth said he was distributing 11 new directives in line with his vision, which defense officials later posted online. They include a review of what constitutes hazing or bullying, a requirement to present Purple Heart awards for those who receive them and a call for the department to find new ways to incentivize top civilian employees to stay while encouraging those who are “underperforming” to leave.
Hegseth also promoted his 2024 book, “The War on Warriors,” examining the ways he believes “woke” culture had weakened the military. As he arrived at Quantico, he posted the phrase on social media and mentioned it again during his remarks.
“You might say we’re ending the war on warriors,” he said, pausing briefly for effect before adding, “I heard someone wrote a book about that.”
That last-minute assembly has raised questions among critics about its cost — particularly for an address that could have been delivered via secure videoconferencing equipment. Flying, lodging and transporting the military leaders from as far away as Japan, the Middle East and Europe is likely to cost millions of dollars, according to two former officials, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue and estimated based on past government travel experience.
The event also raised security concerns about having all the top leadership in one place, particularly given that Tuesday is the end of the fiscal year, with a government shutdown looming. Guidance issued by the Defense Department says that if a shutdown occurs, all travel should be “terminated,” but with exceptions granted by senior leaders.
Natalie Allison, Michael Birnbaum, Emily Davies, Patrick Svitek and Amy B Wang contributed to this report.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... -generals/
Translation
