Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Our main board to talk about our sport
User avatar
dryrunguy
Posts: 1576
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 6:31 am
Has thanked: 697 times
Been thanked: 1157 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2086

Post by dryrunguy »

It's her decision. Let's respect it. And yes, she's free to change her mind--again.
JTContinental United States of America
Posts: 2470
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 7:23 pm
Location: Seattle
Has thanked: 779 times
Been thanked: 1014 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2087

Post by JTContinental »

Deuce wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 2:28 am ^ Again?

She'll be back.

The last time, she went to play cricket.
I assume that this time, she'll go play golf.
It's tough when you can play numerous sports at a high level - you have to satisfy the inherent challenge in each.
She'll be back.
I will miss nothing about her drab game, but I do wish her the best. If the pandemic has brought anything positive, it's that people are making decisions to stop doing things that don't bring them joy anymore.
User avatar
ponchi101 Venezuela
Site Admin
Posts: 15115
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2020 4:40 pm
Location: New Macondo
Has thanked: 3940 times
Been thanked: 5799 times
Contact:

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2088

Post by ponchi101 »

Amidst all this: we have a new #1, in a fashion that has never happened before. And is it the #1 with the lowest point total in history?
Ego figere omnia et scio supellectilem
skatingfan Canada
Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:00 am
Location: Smiths Falls
Has thanked: 1150 times
Been thanked: 937 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2089

Post by skatingfan »

ponchi101 wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:16 am Amidst all this: we have a new #1, in a fashion that has never happened before. And is it the #1 with the lowest point total in history?
Justine Henin retired at #1 - she was also 25 at the time - that's how Ivanovic became #1 after the French Open that year. Point totals were much lower in the past as tournament values have changed over time. Ivanovic had 4200+ points when she was #1.
ashkor87 India
Posts: 4944
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
Location: India
Has thanked: 2529 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2090

Post by ashkor87 »

this is the third casualty, perhaps, of the exremely onerous australian covid rules - first Djokovic, then Cahill, now Barty.. I wonder how many more careers will be damaged/destroyed..
ashkor87 India
Posts: 4944
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
Location: India
Has thanked: 2529 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2091

Post by ashkor87 »

Barty's commitment to tennis was always a bit low.. I had bemoaned her lack of 'responsibility to the game' - this is the culmination..
of course, it is a purely personal decision, we should not criticize her for it . She has every right to live her life...
User avatar
Deuce Canada
Posts: 4531
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 5:52 am
Location: An unparallel universe
Has thanked: 322 times
Been thanked: 974 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2092

Post by Deuce »

ashkor87 wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:37 am this is the third casualty, perhaps, of the exremely onerous australian covid rules - first Djokovic, then Cahill, now Barty.. I wonder how many more careers will be damaged/destroyed..
Ok - you're free to wonder that...
I, myself, wonder how much suffering has been avoided and how many lives have been saved because of Australia's rigid COVID rules.

Meanwhile... Barty doesn't seem to feel that her career has been damaged or destroyed.
I doubt that Cahill feels any resentment over the COVID rules, either.
As for the other guy... well... :roll:
R.I.P. Amal...

“The opposite of courage is not cowardice - it’s conformity. Even a dead fish can go with the flow.”- Jim Hightower
Jeff from TX United States of America
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 4:59 pm
Location: Arizona
Has thanked: 365 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2093

Post by Jeff from TX »

Not shocked but I will miss her style and grace, on and off the court. I wish she had played longer to encourage more complete players - and she was a most complete player in terms of her skill set. I found her game to be anything but drab compared to many other players. She has virtually all the shots.
It seems like time is going backwards towards 1984 . . . :freaking:
dmforever
Posts: 823
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2094

Post by dmforever »

skatingfan wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:34 am
ponchi101 wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 4:16 am Amidst all this: we have a new #1, in a fashion that has never happened before. And is it the #1 with the lowest point total in history?
Justine Henin retired at #1 - she was also 25 at the time - that's how Ivanovic became #1 after the French Open that year. Point totals were much lower in the past as tournament values have changed over time. Ivanovic had 4200+ points when she was #1.
I thought she was 28 or 29 when she retired. Or maybe you are talking about her first retirement. Or maybe I"m wrong. I miss Henin's game too. :)

Kevin
dmforever
Posts: 823
Joined: Thu Dec 24, 2020 7:16 pm
Has thanked: 377 times
Been thanked: 319 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2095

Post by dmforever »

Jeff from TX wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 6:03 am Not shocked but I will miss her style and grace, on and off the court. I wish she had played longer to encourage more complete players - and she was a most complete player in terms of her skill set. I found her game to be anything but drab compared to many other players. She has virtually all the shots.
Why are you not shocked? I'm just curious.

Kevin
User avatar
texasniteowl
Posts: 713
Joined: Wed Dec 09, 2020 5:43 pm
Has thanked: 59 times
Been thanked: 112 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2096

Post by texasniteowl »

Well...I'm a little disappointed, but not shocked. Talking heads have been mentioning rumors for a while. Her break years ago to play cricket was in part because of being homesick. And last year, due to covid rules, she was out of Australia for such a long period of time. I can't imagine how hard that was. She's won Wimbledon and her home slam. She's engaged...is the wedding later this year? She just seems to me like a homebody and just doesn't want to do the traveling anymore.
skatingfan Canada
Posts: 1565
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 2:00 am
Location: Smiths Falls
Has thanked: 1150 times
Been thanked: 937 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2097

Post by skatingfan »

dmforever wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 6:33 am I thought she was 28 or 29 when she retired. Or maybe you are talking about her first retirement. Or maybe I"m wrong. I miss Henin's game too. :)
Her first retirement - when she was #1 - that was the point that this is not the first time that someone inherited the #1 ranking when someone retired.
ashkor87 India
Posts: 4944
Joined: Wed May 26, 2021 6:18 am
Location: India
Has thanked: 2529 times
Been thanked: 889 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2098

Post by ashkor87 »

The great thing about tennis is, since it is not a team game, players can retire and return at will..good thing, really, for the game, this flexibility..
User avatar
Suliso Latvia
Posts: 4514
Joined: Fri Dec 11, 2020 2:30 pm
Location: Basel, Switzerland
Has thanked: 280 times
Been thanked: 1516 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2099

Post by Suliso »

Assuming Barty's name is removed from the rankings immediately following Miami 99% chance Iga Swiatek is our new #1 player. Not too bad...
Jeff from TX United States of America
Posts: 259
Joined: Thu Dec 10, 2020 4:59 pm
Location: Arizona
Has thanked: 365 times
Been thanked: 92 times

Re: Tennis Random, Random

#2100

Post by Jeff from TX »

dmforever wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 6:34 am
Jeff from TX wrote: Wed Mar 23, 2022 6:03 am Not shocked but I will miss her style and grace, on and off the court. I wish she had played longer to encourage more complete players - and she was a most complete player in terms of her skill set. I found her game to be anything but drab compared to many other players. She has virtually all the shots.
Why are you not shocked? I'm just curious.

Kevin
Because she has always had a higher level of identity/internal motivation that was not totally tied to tennis nor did she ever really seem to let it control/be the most important thing in her life. It was obvious that her focus was not solely on winning titles or GS - while that may have been motivating to her, it never seemed to take on the level of importance that it did for other players, and she did not seem to be one of those players who did not thrive on the competitive aspect of the sport. Don't get me wrong - I think she was quite competitive, but it never seemed to be quite as important as it was to many other players. I don't think that is either a good or a bad thing, she just seems to have a fairly different type of personality than many of the other top players and seems to have a "bigger" picture view of the world and the success she has had.
Last edited by Jeff from TX on Thu Mar 24, 2022 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
It seems like time is going backwards towards 1984 . . . :freaking:
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests