Tennis Related - Off Court Serious Issues

[Cuckoo4Coco]

Is this rules of the ATP & WTA or is this just a Citi Open rule?

This applies to many event venues - not just sporting events.

I understand the safety aspect of things, but I think they should allow the backpacks and stuff like that. Just have them checked before people come in.

[dryrunguy]

Serious question: Are these restrictions unique to the U.S.? That's an important question to ask because we have people who like to whip out a pistol and start shooting other drivers for not using a turn signal. Some of these folks go to tennis matches as well. I'm pretty sure Halle and Umag don't have to worry about such things.

That said, of course some of these restrictions are as simple as trying to force attendees to buy lots of stuff at a 500% markup.

[ponchi101]

Nothing like that in Colombia. And it is not as if that country does not know about gun violence (60+ years of guerrillas).
Nor here in Vennieland.

[Cuckoo4Coco]

Nothing like that in Colombia. And it is not as if that country does not know about gun violence (60+ years of guerrillas).
Nor here in Vennieland.

We don't have Gorillas shooting guns, just people causing all the trouble here in America.

[ti-amie]

You CGM, Right, Bro?
Once reserved for diabetics, continuous glucose monitoring is the hot new biohacking tool. Levels and SuperSapiens are harnessing the tech to help you supercharge athletic performance, boost energy, squash bad moods, and lose fat.

BY BILL GIFFORD PUBLISHED: MAR 1, 2021

MARY CAROLINE RUSSELL

I’ve got a needle in my arm, and I’m craving chocolate cake.

The cake in question is my mom’s, flourless and rich, on a plate she’s just handed me at brunch. The needle—more like a filament, actually—is attached to a sensor called a continuous glucose monitor, or CGM, which measures my blood-glucose level in real time.

I know two things: One, this cake is delicious. Two, it will probably jack my glucose reading sky-high, which has all sorts of possible unwanted consequences, ranging from me falling asleep on the couch in an hour to, over the long term, premature cardiovascular disease. But I’ve already had pancakes with syrup and a bagel with smoked salmon this morning, so what the hell. I eat the cake and cut a second slice.

A little later, I check an app called Levels, which receives data from my CGM and puts it through a proprietary algorithm to gauge my metabolic health—one aspect of this being how quickly and efficiently my body processes sugar and other carbohydrates. Every meal is assigned a score based on how much my glucose rises and how long it stays high. On the app’s ten-point scale, Mom’s carb-blowout brunch rates a zero. Not good.

It’s my first week of beta testing Levels’ CGM-based metabolic-health program, and so far it’s been, uh, interesting. A CGM is normally available by prescription to people who have been diagnosed with either type 1 or type 2 diabetes. These patients rely on CGM readings to gauge when they need to inject insulin (the hormone that helps bring glucose levels down when they’re too high) and when they need to eat to prevent hypoglycemia (low blood sugar), a potentially life-threatening situation.

Levels and a few other start-ups have begun to make CGMs available to non-diabetics like me who are interested in understanding how our metabolism responds to what we eat and how that in turn affects our sleep, energy level, sex life, and athletic performance. The idea is that by keeping on top of our blood-glucose level, we might change our behavior, improve our quality of life, and lower our risk of chronic disease.

I test-drove two of the new apps: Levels, which is oriented toward diet and optimizing metabolism, and Supersapiens, which is aimed at athletes. After at least a month of using both, it’s safe to say that brunch has been all but ruined for me. But I have a new appreciation for the importance of controlling my glucose level—and how much better it makes me feel, both when exercising and in my life in general.

Levels was founded by a former SpaceX engineer named Josh Clemente, who found himself, at the ripe old age of 28, hitting a wall. Many afternoons, his energy level would crater, often dragging his mood down, too. (Sound familiar?) The part-time CrossFit trainer looked fit, but inside, he says, “I felt like I had some sort of fatal illness.” He bought a glucose meter and began pricking his finger and testing his blood multiple times per day, keeping a spreadsheet of the results. He then got a prescription CGM from a doctor friend, and he was astonished by what it revealed. “It basically told me I fit the criteria for prediabetes,” he says.

Nearly 30 million Americans have been diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, defined as the body’s inability to manage blood-sugar levels. But another 88 million have prediabetes, meaning they have higher-than-normal blood sugar—and the vast majority are not aware of it. More alarming, a 2019 study from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill estimated that only 12 percent of American adults are metabolically healthy, defined as having optimal (without medication) triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, blood pressure, blood glucose, and waist circumference.

I was sort of in the same boat. My last fasting glucose test, a few weeks before I tried a CGM, had come out a reassuring 87 mg/dL. (At or below 99 mg/dL is considered to be ideal; 100 and above is cause for concern.) I’m good, I thought. A few weeks later, my Levels kit arrived, containing an Abbott FreeStyle Libre CGM that had been prescribed by a Levels doctor via telemedicine. I applied the half-dollar-sized disc to my upper arm, inserting a filament painlessly into my skin. The sensor took minute-by-minute readings, storing the data on my phone. Watching my glucose level rise and fall through the day told a different, and more alarming, story than the static reading at my doctor’s office.

The Levels app took my CGM data, coupled with my entries for meals and exercise and other notes, and computed a daily metabolic score, expressed as a percentage. This score was based on my average glucose level each day, the number and steepness of post-meal spikes, and the amount of time I spent outside the Levels-defined optimal glucose range of 70 to 110 mg/dL. (Higher blood-glucose levels can cause cellular and vascular damage; very low levels can lead to feelings of fatigue and brain fog.)

Most days, the Levels app scored my metabolic performance in the high 50s, which I assumed was pretty good until I talked to Casey Means, M.D., a Levels cofounder and its chief medical officer. “Well,” she said diplomatically, “the lowest it goes is 50, so there’s that.” Oh.

The Levels app seemed rather judgy, to be honest, but with good reason. High levels of blood glucose—and the surges of insulin that the pancreas secretes to try to dispose of all that energy (or store it as fat)—are strongly correlated with chronic disease, says Peter Attia, M.D., a physician whose practice focuses on longevity. High glucose can damage blood vessels and arteries, leading to kidney disease, erectile dysfunction, blindness, and even dementia. High levels of insulin are strongly linked to obesity, and the hormone has anabolic effects that could fuel certain cancers. “It’s almost assuredly why obesity is the second-largest modifiable risk factor in cancer, after smoking,” Dr. Attia says.

The basic theory behind Levels is that by lowering our average glucose level, and especially the spikes after eating, we can reproduce and thus lower our risk of chronic disease—as well as feel better day-to-day. “Improving glucose is low-hanging fruit for improving health and well-being,” says Dr. Means. “It is the foundational unit of energy in the body. And it
is out of whack, at scale, in our country.”

In practice, weaning myself from my carb habit proved to be difficult. Many of my go-to meals—whole-milk yogurt with granola and fruit for breakfast, a burrito or an Italian sandwich for lunch, pasta or risotto for dinner—jacked up my glucose level, resulting in electronic disapproval from my phone. And certain foods triggered extreme reactions: A few bites of our kid’s pancakes got my blood glucose to 180, and a “healthy” lunch of vegetarian tacos set my all-time record of 208.

On the other hand, my CGM seemed to be okay with things like eggs and bacon in the morning, steak or grilled salmon at dinner, salads and leafy vegetables, nuts instead of chips at snack time, and pretty much anything involving avocados. I began making some modest changes to my diet and generally eating smaller portions. Levels prompts users to photograph their meals with each log entry, and that made me pay more attention to what I ate. My daily score gradually crept upward, into the 60s, 70s, even high 80s. I’ve always loved carbs and have never been a fan of any kind of labeled diet, but my CGM was carb-shaming me into eating more reasonably.

“CGM becomes a tool to change behavior,” says Dominic D’Agostino, Ph.D., an associate professor at the University of South Florida, who has experimented with different diets and foods while beta testing Levels. “I considered myself hyperaware of what food does to the body, but CGM takes that to another level. And it’s actionable.”

He adds, “I think CGM could be a powerful tool to get people’s metabolic health under control, before it becomes a problem.” It wasn’t just my own behavior that changed: My partner had initially made fun of the glucose sensor implanted in my arm and my constant checking of the Levels app. “How’s your glucose today?” she’d tease. But then one day she came home from Trader Joe’s with a bag of frozen low-carb cauliflower gnocchi. We cooked them up that night with some lamb ragù, and they were delicious—and we didn’t end up with that carb-bloated feeling we get from pasta. Even Levels approved.

At the same time, I was using another, very different CGM-based platform, Supersapiens, looking for insights into the link between glucose and athletic performance. Cofounded by Phil Southerland, a former professional cyclist and a diabetic, Supersapiens is meant to teach elite and recreational athletes what Southerland learned the hard way about the importance of managing his glucose level as an athlete.

As a young cyclist with type 1 diabetes, meaning his pancreas produces little to no insulin, Southerland saw that on days when his blood sugar was low, he would race poorly, while a more stable glucose level often translated into better performance. But there was no way to keep track of how his glucose changed during an event. When he began using a CGM about a decade ago, he saw how important tracking levels while active could be.

“My knowledge of everything that happened in my body—food, insulin, nutrition, sleep—increased exponentially in those first 20 days of using continuous glucose monitoring,” he says. His fellow athletes on Team Novo Nordisk, which he founded, began using CGM to help with their training and racing, and their results improved. “It was a phenomenal tool,” he says.

https://www.menshealth.com/health/a3554 ... ersapiens/

[ponchi101]

I am sorry you have to go through all that, but thanks for the explanation. Amazing tech. I hope it will be useful to you.

[ti-amie]

Rafa is using one and Wawrinka was wearing one today. I wouldn't be surprised if Zverev is wearing one when he returns to the tour.

[ponchi101]

I was joking about Rafa's. I said it was his ON/OFF/Charge port

[Fastbackss]

Serious question: Are these restrictions unique to the U.S.? That's an important question to ask because we have people who like to whip out a pistol and start shooting other drivers for not using a turn signal. Some of these folks go to tennis matches as well. I'm pretty sure Halle and Umag don't have to worry about such things.

That said, of course some of these restrictions are as simple as trying to force attendees to buy lots of stuff at a 500% markup.

Virtually every major League sporting event in the US (I know your question was about abroad) uses some form of the same entering criteria.

The last 4 or 5 events I have been to included watching female attendees scramble to return to their car as they were not able to enter with their purse. I always try to remember to tell those going with me.

As for the backpack thing, yeah, given some events that have occurred in the US it (sadly) makes sense for events where crowds gather.

[Deuce]

Serious question: Are these restrictions unique to the U.S.? That's an important question to ask because we have people who like to whip out a pistol and start shooting other drivers for not using a turn signal. Some of these folks go to tennis matches as well. I'm pretty sure Halle and Umag don't have to worry about such things.

That said, of course some of these restrictions are as simple as trying to force attendees to buy lots of stuff at a 500% markup.

Virtually every major League sporting event in the US (I know your question was about abroad) uses some form of the same entering criteria.

The last 4 or 5 events I have been to included watching female attendees scramble to return to their car as they were not able to enter with their purse. I always try to remember to tell those going with me.

As for the backpack thing, yeah, given some events that have occurred in the US it (sadly) makes sense for events where crowds gather.

'Land of the free', huh?
Not quite.

For the record, I'm completely against these types of overzealous restrictions. I find them absolutely ridiculous. And it reduces the enjoyment of the activity.
As I said previously - if one lives his/her life in constant fear, that is not living. Allow for fear in certain circumstances, ok... but not everywhere.

But, hey, it's also about 'public relations'. With these ridiculous restrictions, they can fool some people into believing that they are doing this 'for everyone's safety'.
Yeah - sure... just like America is 'the land of the free'.
They wouldn't lie to us, would they?

[ti-amie]

Sigh. Morgane Lara must be new.











Ben Rothenberg
@BenRothenberg

After briefly considering cutting her flag down to a regulation size, Lola was escorted by the security official to the parking lot, where he had told her she could store this offending Ukrainian flag in her car.

She was then allowed to return to the tournament grounds.

Asked for comment, the #CincyTennis simply pointed to the rule about flag size.

The WTA, whose chair umpire (and player) precipitated this incident, have not replied to a request for comment for nearly 24 hours now.

Tennis has not been consistent in how it has handled issues regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as we know, both in terms of policies and in symbolic displays of support.

But this incident, I believe, is a clear misstep.

(12/12)

[AcesAnnie]

Sigh. No idea who the chair is.











Ben Rothenberg
@BenRothenberg

After briefly considering cutting her flag down to a regulation size, Lola was escorted by the security official to the parking lot, where he had told her she could store this offending Ukrainian flag in her car.

She was then allowed to return to the tournament grounds.

Asked for comment, the #CincyTennis simply pointed to the rule about flag size.

The WTA, whose chair umpire (and player) precipitated this incident, have not replied to a request for comment for nearly 24 hours now.

Tennis has not been consistent in how it has handled issues regarding the Russian invasion of Ukraine, as we know, both in terms of policies and in symbolic displays of support.

But this incident, I believe, is a clear misstep.

(12/12)

First off, this if it is an actual rule is ridiculous. There have been countless times I have seen Countries Flags draped around fans. If this is a rule, it must be exclusive to Cincinnati. Second, the player that brought up an issue with the fan who apparently was sitting quietly in the stands watching the match and just supporting her favorite player and the country she is from should be ashamed of herself for even bringing up the matter. I imagine this was Anastasia Potapova. This is something that needs to be address and quickly, because if this would have been any other countries flag or any other player, the issue would not have arisen.

[ponchi101]

Time to edit the rules-book?
This, the warning given to Ruud for taking a bathroom break but not actually using the loo. Some really dumb situations, lately.

[AcesAnnie]

Time to edit the rules-book?
This, the warning given to Ruud for taking a bathroom break but not actually using the loo. Some really dumb situations, lately.

My question about the whole bathroom craziness, do they actually have attendants watching to see if the players actually use the toilet?

[skatingfan]

My question about the whole bathroom craziness, do they actually have attendants watching to see if the players actually use the toilet?

Yes