by ti-amie Entries
Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Iga Swiatek 1 1
2 Ons Jabeur 2 2
3 Jessica Pegula 3 3
4 Caroline Garcia 4 4
5 Aryna Sabalenka 5 5
6 Maria Sakkari 6 6
7 Coco Gauff 7 7
8 Daria Kasatkina 8 8
9 Veronika Kudermetova 9 9
10 Madison Keys 11 11
11 Belinda Bencic 12 12
12 Paula Badosa 13 13
13 Danielle Collins 14 14
14 Beatriz Haddad Maia 15 15
15 Petra Kvitova 16 16
16 Anett Kontaveit 17 17
17 Jelena Ostapenko 18 18
18 Ekaterina Alexandrova 19 19
19 Liudmila Samsonova 20 20
20 Barbora Krejcikova 21 21
21 Elena Rybakina 22 22
22 Amanda Anisimova 23 23
23 Shuai Zhang 24 24
24 Marie Bouzkova 25 25
25 Victoria Azarenka 26 26
26 Qinwen Zheng 27 27
27 Martina Trevisan 28 28
28 Elise Mertens 29 29
29 Aliaksandra Sasnovich 30 30
30 Karolina Pliskova 31 31
31 Kaia Kanepi 32 32
32 Ajla Tomljanovic 33 33
Irina-Camelia Begu 34 34
Jil Teichmann 35 35
Alizé Cornet 36 36
Sloane Stephens 37 37
Sorana Cirstea 38 38
Petra Martic 39 39
Leylah Fernandez 40 40
Alison Riske-Amritraj 41 41
Naomi Osaka 42 42
Anastasia Potapova 43 43
Bernarda Pera 44 44
Bianca Andreescu 45 45
Shelby Rogers 46 46
Katerina Siniakova 47 47
Ana Bogdan 48 48
Magda Linette 49 49
Xiyu Wang 50 50
Yulia Putintseva 51 51
Mayar Sherif 52 52
Anhelina Kalinina 53 53
Alison Van Uytvanck 55 55
Garbiñe Muguruza 56 56
Danka Kovinic 57 57
Lucia Bronzetti 58 58
Madison Brengle 59 59
Anna Kalinskaya 60 60
Claire Liu 61 61
Sara Sorribes Tormo 62 62
Jasmine Paolini 63 63
Lin Zhu 64 64
Rebecca Marino 65 65
Elisabetta Cocciaretto 66 66
Jule Niemeier 67 67
Camila Giorgi 68 68
Donna Vekic 69 69
Tatjana Maria 70 70
Marta Kostyuk 71 71
Nuria Parrizas Diaz 72 72
Tereza Martincova 73 73
Tamara Korpatsch 74 74
Emma Raducanu 75 75
Viktorija Golubic 76 76
Linda Fruhvirtova 77 77
Yue Yuan 78 78
Anna Bondar 79 79
Anna Blinkova 80 80
Camila Osorio 81 81
Maryna Zanevska 82 82
Julia Grabher 83 83
Dalma Galfi 84 84
Tamara Zidansek 85 85
Xinyu Wang 86 86
Lauren Davis 87 87
Panna Udvardy 88 88
Kaja Juvan 89 89
Viktoriya Tomova 90 90
Qiang Wang 91 91
Kamilla Rakhimova 92 92
Catherine Mcnally 93 93
Varvara Gracheva 94 94
Ysaline Bonaventure 95 95
Marketa Vondrousova 97 32 (SR)
Jaqueline Cristian 151 65 (SR)
Karolina Muchova 154 22 (SR)
Laura Siegemund 175 57 (SR)
Nadia Podoroska 194 39 (SR)
Sofia Kenin 240 4 (SR)
Kristina Kucova 270 90 (SR)
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 372 21 (SR)
Evgeniya Rodina 446 73 (SR)
Patricia Maria Tig 795 65 (SR)
Saisai Zheng - 89 (SR)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Harriet Dart 96 96
2 Kateryna Baindl 98 98
3 Dayana Yastremska 99 99
4 Alycia Parks 100 100
5 Margarita Betova - 100 (SR)
6 Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 101 101
7 Linda Noskova 102 102
8 Cristina Bucsa 104 104
9 Elena-Gabriela Ruse 105 105
10 Moyuka Uchijima 106 106
11 Ana Konjuh 107 107
12 Sara Errani 108 108
13 Diane Parry 109 109
14 Leolia Jeanjean 110 110
15 Reka Luca Jani 111 111
16 Diana Shnaider 112 112
17 Aleksandra Krunic 113 113
18 Katie Volynets 114 114
19 Kristina Mladenovic 115 115
20 Arantxa Rus 116 116

by ti-amie Entries
Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Carlos Alcaraz 1 1
2 Rafael Nadal 2 2
3 Casper Ruud 3 3
4 Stefanos Tsitsipas 4 4
5 Novak Djokovic 5 5
6 Felix Auger-Aliassime 6 6
7 Daniil Medvedev 7 7
8 Andrey Rublev 8 8
9 Taylor Fritz 9 9
10 Hubert Hurkacz 10 10
11 Holger Rune 11 11
12 Alexander Zverev 12 12
13 Pablo Carreno Busta 13 13
14 Cameron Norrie 14 14
15 Jannik Sinner 15 15
16 Matteo Berrettini 16 16
17 Marin Cilic 17 17
18 Denis Shapovalov 18 18
19 Frances Tiafoe 19 19
20 Karen Khachanov 20 20
21 Roberto Bautista Agut 21 21
22 Nick Kyrgios 22 22
23 Lorenzo Musetti 23 23
24 Alex de Minaur 24 24
25 Diego Schwartzman 25 25
26 Borna Coric 26 26
27 Daniel Evans 27 27
28 Grigor Dimitrov 28 28
29 Miomir Kecmanovic 29 29
30 Francisco Cerundolo 30 30
31 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 31 31
32 Tommy Paul 32 32
Sebastian Korda 33 33
Maxime Cressy 34 34
Botic van de Zandschulp 35 35
Yoshihito Nishioka 36 36
Alexander Bublik 37 37
Reilly Opelka 38 38
Albert Ramos-Vinolas 39 39
Emil Ruusuvuori 40 40
John Isner 41 41
Jack Draper 42 42
Sebastian Baez 43 43
Arthur Rinderknech 44 44
Lorenzo Sonego 45 45
Adrian Mannarino 46 46
Brandon Nakashima 47 47
Jenson Brooksby 48 48
Andy Murray 49 49
Alex Molcan 50 50
Corentin Moutet 51 51
David Goffin 53 53
Filip Krajinovic 54 54
Fabio Fognini 55 55
Marc-Andrea Huesler 56 56
Pedro Cachin 57 57
Jaume Munar 58 58
Aslan Karatsev 59 59
Benjamin Bonzi 60 60
Marcos Giron 61 61
Pedro Martinez 62 62
Mackenzie McDonald 63 63
Quentin Halys 64 64
Constant Lestienne 65 65
J.J. Wolf 66 66
Daniel Elahi Galan 67 67
Richard Gasquet 68 68
Mikael Ymer 69 69
Laslo Djere 70 70
Thiago Monteiro 71 71
Bernabe Zapata Miralles 72 72
Ilya Ivashka 73 73
Roberto Carballes Baena 74 74
Federico Coria 75 75
Oscar Otte 76 76
Kamil Majchrzak 77 77
Christopher O'Connell 78 78
Tomas Martin Etcheverry 79 79
Dusan Lajovic 80 80
Jiri Lehecka 81 81
Joao Sousa 82 82
Soonwoo Kwon 83 83
Jordan Thompson 84 84
Cristian Garin 85 85
Ugo Humbert 86 86
Chun-Hsin Tseng 87 87
Marton Fucsovics 88 88
Roman Safiullin 89 89
Facundo Bagnis 90 90
Gregoire Barrere 91 91
Nikoloz Basilashvili 92 92
Taro Daniel 93 93
Thanasi Kokkinakis 94 94
Daniel Altmaier 95 95
Tallon Griekspoor 96 96
Ben Shelton 97 97
Tomas Machac 98 98
Nuno Borges 99 99
Hugo Dellien 119 73 (PR)
Stan Wawrinka 149 22 (PR)
Lloyd Harris 239 47 (PR)
Kyle Edmund 583 48 (PR)
Guido Pella - 75 (PR)
Jeremy Chardy - 88 (PR)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Vasek Pospisil 100 100
2 Zhizhen Zhang 101 101
3 Attila Balazs 723 101 (PR)
4 Alejandro Tabilo 102 102
5 Pavel Kotov 103 103
6 Marco Cecchinato 104 104
7 Dominic Thiem 105 105
8 Radu Albot 106 106
9 Emilio Gomez 107 107
10 Juan Pablo Varillas 108 108
11 Denis Kudla 109 109
12 Jason Kubler 110 110
13 Hugo Gaston 111 111
14 Jiri Vesely 112 112
15 Steve Johnson 113 113
16 Tim van Rijthoven 114 114
17 Michael Mmoh 115 115
18 Norbert Gombos 116 116
19 Yibing Wu 117 117
20 Dominic Stricker 118 118


Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Gael Monfils 52 52

by ti-amie Caty McNally earns 2023 Australian Open wild card
November 01, 2022

A late-season surge has given American Caty McNally a spot in the main draw of 2023's first Grand Slam tournament. The 20-year-old Ohio native earned the most ranking points over the last five weeks to clinch the top spot in the USTA's women's Australian Open Wild Card Challenge.

A player's best three results over the last five weeks counted towards the overall standings, and McNally earned a total of 189 points as a result of a strong string of results at indoor hard-court tournaments in Europe. She qualified and reached the quarterfinals at the WTA 500 in Ostrava, Czech Republic (125 points); reached the semifinals at an ITF World Tennis Tour W60-level event in Trnava, Slovakia (29 points); and qualified and reached the quarterfinals at a WTA 125-level event in Rouen, France (35 points).

McNally will be competing in the Australian Open main draw for the second time in her career, having debuted in 2020. That year, she qualified and reached the second round; she lost in qualifying in each of her two attempts to return to the main draw in Melbourne since then.

The final women's standings can be found below, with each player's current WTA ranking in parenthesis. Should McNally earn direct entry into the Australian Open when the entry lists are made on Dec. 5, the wild card will go to the next eligible American in the standings who doesn't earn direct entry.

1. Caty McNally (No. 111) -- 189

2. Madison Brengle (No. 52) -- 161

3. Taylor Townsend (No. 131) -- 130

4. Alycia Parks (No. 117) -- 126

5. Claire Liu (No. 61) -- 111

The corresponding men's challenge began last week and runs through Nov. 14. No. 286-ranked Tennys Sandgren, a two-time Australian Open quarterfinalist, currently leads the standings with 84 points as a result of winning the Las Vegas Challenger, his first USTA Pro Circuit victory in five years.

The USTA and Tennis Australia will exchange main-draw wild cards for the 2023 Australian Open and US Open through reciprocal agreement. Wild card recipients will have to follow all Australian Open protocols as it relates to quarantine or vaccination.

The 2023 Australian Open main draw runs from Jan. 16-29 at Melbourne Park in Melbourne, Australia.

https://www.usta.com/en/home/pro/pro-me ... card-.html

by Deuce That's good for McNally.
It looks like breaking up the doubles pairing of her and Gauff was good for her. I think that, by having doubles success with Gauff, there were inevitable comparisons between the two in singles, and Gauff's success in singles may have put pressure on McNally.
Now that she is away from that comparison, she is coming into her own in singles, which I doubt is merely a co-incidence.

by JTContinental Venus has been awarded a wildcard

by ponchi101 Which will make it 25 years playing at the Aussie.
That's got to be a record.

by ti-amie UPDATED WTA MD Entry Lists


Entries
Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking
1 Iga Swiatek 1 1
2 Ons Jabeur 2 2
3 Jessica Pegula 3 3
4 Caroline Garcia 4 4
5 Aryna Sabalenka 5 5
6 Maria Sakkari 6 6
7 Coco Gauff 7 7
8 Daria Kasatkina 8 8
9 Veronika Kudermetova 9 9
10 Madison Keys 11 11
11 Belinda Bencic 12 12
12 Paula Badosa 13 13
13 Danielle Collins 14 14
14 Beatriz Haddad Maia 15 15
15 Petra Kvitova 16 16
16 Anett Kontaveit 17 17
17 Jelena Ostapenko 18 18
18 Ekaterina Alexandrova 19 19
19 Liudmila Samsonova 20 20
20 Elena Rybakina 21 22
21 Barbora Krejcikova 22 21
22 Amanda Anisimova 23 23
23 Marie Bouzkova 24 25
24 Shuai Zhang 25 24
25 Victoria Azarenka 26 26
26 Qinwen Zheng 27 27
27 Martina Trevisan 28 28
28 Elise Mertens 29 29
29 Aliaksandra Sasnovich 30 30
30 Karolina Pliskova 31 31
31 Kaia Kanepi 32 32
32 Ajla Tomljanovic 33 33
Irina-Camelia Begu 34 34
Jil Teichmann 35 35
Alizé Cornet 36 36
Sloane Stephens 37 37
Petra Martic 38 39
Anhelina Kalinina 39 53
Leylah Fernandez 40 40
Alison Riske-Amritraj 41 41
Naomi Osaka 42 42
Anastasia Potapova 43 43
Bernarda Pera 44 44
Sorana Cirstea 45 38
Bianca Andreescu 46 45
Shelby Rogers 47 46
Magda Linette 48 49
Katerina Siniakova 49 47
Xiyu Wang 50 50
Yulia Putintseva 51 51
Mayar Sherif 52 52
Lucia Bronzetti 54 58
Garbiñe Muguruza 55 56
Ana Bogdan 56 48
Madison Brengle 57 59
Anna Kalinskaya 58 60
Claire Liu 59 61
Danka Kovinic 60 57
Sara Sorribes Tormo 61 62
Jasmine Paolini 62 63
Lin Zhu 63 64
Rebecca Marino 64 65
Elisabetta Cocciaretto 65 66
Jule Niemeier 66 67
Camila Giorgi 67 68
Donna Vekic 68 69
Tatjana Maria 69 70
Marta Kostyuk 70 71
Nuria Parrizas Diaz 71 72
Tereza Martincova 72 73
Alison Van Uytvanck 73 55
Anna Blinkova 74 80
Tamara Korpatsch 75 74
Viktorija Golubic 77 76
Linda Fruhvirtova 78 77
Anna Bondar 79 79
Emma Raducanu 80 75
Camila Osorio 81 81
Maryna Zanevska 82 82
Julia Grabher 83 83
Dalma Galfi 84 84
Tamara Zidansek 85 85
Xinyu Wang 86 86
Lauren Davis 87 87
Panna Udvardy 88 88
Kaja Juvan 89 89
Viktoriya Tomova 90 90
Marketa Vondrousova 92 32 (SR)
Caty Mcnally 93 93
Kamilla Rakhimova 94 92
Ysaline Bonaventure 95 95
Yue Yuan 97 78
Harriet Dart 98 96
Varvara Gracheva 100 94
(WC) Diane Parry 110
(WC) Taylor Townsend 134
Jaqueline Cristian 147 65 (SR)
Karolina Muchova 152 22 (SR)
Laura Siegemund 175 57 (SR)
Nadia Podoroska 194 39 (SR)
(WC) Olivia Gadecki 200
Sofia Kenin 230 4 (SR)
(WC) Storm Hunter 241
Kristina Kucova 268 90 (SR)
(WC) Talia Gibson 342
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 368 21 (SR)
Evgeniya Rodina 438 73 (SR)
Patricia Maria Tig 788 65 (SR)
(WC) Venus Williams 1007
Saisai Zheng - 89 (SR)
(WC)
(WC)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Kateryna Baindl 99 98
2 Dayana Yastremska 101 99
3 Alycia Parks 76 100
4 Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 103 101
5 Linda Noskova 102 102
6 Cristina Bucsa 105 104
7 Elena-Gabriela Ruse 117 105
8 Moyuka Uchijima 107 106
9 Ana Konjuh 108 107
10 Sara Errani 109 108
12 Leolia Jeanjean 112 110
13 Reka Luca Jani 113 111
14 Diana Shnaider 111 112
15 Aleksandra Krunic 115 113
16 Katie Volynets 114 114
17 Kristina Mladenovic 125 115
18 Arantxa Rus 116 116
19 Laura Pigossi 118 117
20 Magdalena Frech 106 118


Withdrawals

Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking
Qiang Wang 91 91

by ti-amie WTA Qualifying Entry Lists

Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Alycia Parks 76 76
2 Clara Tauson 96 96
3 Kateryna Baindl 99 99
4 Dayana Yastremska 101 101
5 Linda Noskova 102 102
6 Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 103 103
7 Cristina Bucsa 105 105
8 Magdalena Frech 106 106
9 Moyuka Uchijima 107 107
10 Ana Konjuh 108 108
11 Sara Errani 109 109
12 Diane Parry 110 110
13 Diana Shnaider 111 111
14 Leolia Jeanjean 112 112
15 Reka Luca Jani 113 113
16 Katie Volynets 114 114
17 Arantxa Rus 116 116
18 Elena-Gabriela Ruse 117 117
19 Laura Pigossi 118 118
20 Rebecca Peterson 119 119
21 Anna-Lena Friedsam 120 120
22 Clara Burel 122 122
23 Marina Bassols Ribera 123 123
24 Ylena In-Albon 124 124
25 Kristina Mladenovic 125 125
26 Simona Waltert 126 126
27 Elizabeth Mandlik 127 127
28 Eva Lys 128 128
29 Coco Vandeweghe 129 129
30 Brenda Fruhvirtova 130 130
31 Ann Li 131 131
32 Rebeka Masarova 132 132
Jodie Burrage 133 133
Taylor Townsend 134 134
Viktoria Kuzmova 135 135
Erika Andreeva 136 136
Katie Boulter 137 137
Lesia Tsurenko 138 138
Nao Hibino 139 139
Su Jeong Jang 140 140
Heather Watson 141 141
Lucrezia Stefanini 142 142
Aliona Bolsova 143 143
Harmony Tan 144 144
Elsa Jacquemot 145 145
Katie Swan 146 146
Maria Carle 148 148
Daria Snigur 149 149
Caroline Dolehide 151 151
Na-Lae Han 153 153
Elina Avanesyan 154 154
Priscilla Hon 155 155
Olga Danilovic 156 156
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva 157 157
Mirjam Bjorklund 158 158
Despina Papamichail 159 159
Katrina Scott 160 160
Jaimee Fourlis 162 162
Louisa Chirico 163 163
Chloe Paquet 164 164
Jessika Ponchet 165 165
Hailey Baptiste 166 166
Fernanda Contreras Gomez 167 167
Paula Ormaechea 168 168
Leyre Romero Gormaz 169 169
Nigina Abduraimova 170 170
Asia Muhammad 171 171
Anastasia Zakharova 172 172
Kimberly Birrell 173 173
Irina Bara 174 174
Misaki Doi 176 176
Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik 177 177
Vitalia Diatchenko 178 178
Maddison Inglis 179 179
Sara Bejlek 180 180
Ipek Oz 181 181
Ashlyn Krueger 182 182
Polina Kudermetova 183 183
Selena Janicijevic 184 184
Joanne Zuger 185 185
Tara Wurth 186 186
Oksana Selekhmeteva 187 187
Petra Marcinko 188 188
Sachia Vickery 189 189
Carol Zhao 190 190
Katharina Hobgarski 191 191
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 192 192
Robin Anderson 193 193
Sinja Kraus 195 195
Kayla Day 196 196
Valentini Grammatikopoulou 197 197
Gabriela Lee 198 198
Suzan Lamens 199 199
Olivia Gadecki 200 200
Raluka Serban 201 201
Mai Hontama 202 202
Carole Monnet 203 203
Darya Astakhova 204 204
Barbora Palicova 205 205
Sonay Kartal 206 206
Marcela Zacarias 207 207
Magali Kempen 209 209
Yuki Naito 210 210
Yuriko Miyazaki 212 212
Irina Khromacheva 213 213
Eudice Chong 214 214
Alexandra Eala 215 215
Natalija Stevanovic 216 216
Arianne Hartono 217 217
Carolina Alves 218 218
Anastasia Gasanova 219 219
Sophie Chang 220 220
Robin Montgomery 221 221
Kathinka Von Deichmann 229 173 (SR)
Arina Rodionova 296 207 (SR)
Katarina Zavatska 308 145 (SR)
Eugenie Bouchard 327 118 (SR)
Barbara Haas 417 173 (SR)
Zoe Hives 769 142 (SR)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Rosa Vicens Mas 222 222
2 Katherine Sebov 223 223
3 Ekaterine Gorgodze 224 224
4 Eva Vedder 225 225
5 Mona Barthel 226 226
6 Greet Minnen 227 227
7 Ekaterina Reyngold 228 228
8 Anastasia Tikhonova 231 231
9 Ekaterina Makarova 232 232
10 Lesley Pattinama Kerkhove 233 233
11 Emiliana Arango 399 233 (SR)
12 Camilla Rosatello 234 234
13 Astra Sharma 235 235
14 Tena Lukas 236 236
15 Noma Noha Akugue 237 237
16 Elvina Kalieva 238 238
17 Tessah Andrianjafitrimo 239 239
18 Tereza Mrdeza 532 239 (SR)
19 Storm Hunter 241 241
20 Jana Fett 242 242
21 Lina Gjorcheska 243 243
22 Lea Boskovic 244 244
23 Katarzyna Kawa 245 245
24 Iryna Shymanovich 246 246
25 Weronika Falkowska 247 247
26 Miriam Bulgaru 248 248
27 Kaylah Mcphee 578 248 (SR)
28 Darja Semenistaja 249 249
29 Natalia Szabanin 250 250
30 Lina Glushko 251 25

Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Harriet Dart 98 98 (To MD via WC)
Maja Chwalinska 161 161

by ti-amie WTA MD Doubles Entry Lists

Seed* Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Katerina Siniakova / Barbora Krejcikova 4 4
2 Jessica Pegula / Coco Gauff 10 7
3 Storm Hunter / Elise Mertens 15 15
4 Giuliana Olmos / Gabriela Dabrowski 15 15
5 Lyudmyla Kichenok / Jelena Ostapenko 23 23
6 Demi Schuurs / Desirae Krawczyk 34 34
7 Anna Danilina / Sania Mirza 35 35
8 Shuai Zhang / Beatriz Haddad Maia 38 38
9 Ellen Perez / Nicole Melichar-Martinez 39 39
10 Shuko Aoyama / Ena Shibahara 45 45
11 Zhaoxuan Yang / Hao-Ching Chan 52 52
12 Laura Siegemund / Kirsten Flipkens 56 56
13 Asia Muhammad / Taylor Townsend 59 59
14 Alicja Rosolska / Erin Routliffe 62 62
15 Caty Mcnally / Luisa Stefani 68 68
16 Tamara Zidansek / Eri Hozumi 84 84
Yana Sizikova / Anastasia Potapova 89 89
Aldila Sutjiadi / Miyu Kato 96 96
Kristina Mladenovic / Timea Babos 99 99
Caroline Dolehide / Anna Kalinskaya 112 91
Kimberley Zimmermann / Nadiia Kichenok 119 119
Olivia Nicholls / Alicia Barnett 120 120
Ulrikke Eikeri / Catherine Harrison 121 121
Alexandra Panova / Natela Dzalamidze 121 121
Sophie Chang / Angela Kulikov 121 121
Oksana Kalashnikova / Alycia Parks 121 121
Greet Minnen / Anna Bondar 127 127
Elena-Gabriela Ruse / Marta Kostyuk 128 128
Makoto Ninomiya / Cristina Bucsa 128 128
Lidziya Marozava / Xinyun Han 135 135
Vivian Heisen / Ekaterina Alexandrova 141 92
Monica Niculescu / Viktorija Golubic 143 130
Tereza Mihalikova / Aliaksandra Sasnovich 152 82
Alexa Guarachi / Latisha Chan 157 62
Marketa Vondrousova / Miriam Kolodziejova 173 103
Veronika Kudermetova / Liudmila Samsonova 194 22
Jil Teichmann / Belinda Bencic 240 47
Anna Blinkova / Lin Zhu 248 137
Shelby Rogers / Irina-Camelia Begu 261 81
Bernarda Pera / Dalma Galfi 263 128
Marie Bouzkova / Camila Osorio 349 105
Martina Trevisan / Jasmine Paolini 387 90
Heather Watson / Danielle Collins 407 141
Sofia Kenin / Yulia Putintseva 461 55
Nadia Podoroska / Mayar Sherif 482 91
Kaitlyn Christian / Danka Kovinic 483 124
Alison Van Uytvanck / Anhelina Kalinina 523 112
Elena Rybakina / Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 526 104
Madison Brengle / Rebecca Marino 626 121
Xiyu Wang / Magda Linette 714 94
Linda Fruhvirtova / Alison Riske-Amritraj 815 119
Tatjana Maria / Ana Bogdan 886 125
Elisabetta Cocciaretto / Lucia Bronzetti 982 119
Jaqueline Cristian / Tamara Korpatsch 1245 140
Tereza Martincova / Donna Vekic 1303 140
Panna Udvardy / Aliona Bolsova - 125
Bethanie Mattek-Sands / Leylah Fernandez - 60
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -

Alternates (Advanced)
Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Sabrina Santamaria / Claire Liu 486 145
2 Alizé Cornet / Diane Parry 452 146
3 Samantha Stosur / Ajla Tomljanovic 252 149
4 Ingrid Neel / Nuria Parrizas Diaz 410 152
5 Patricia Maria Tig / Viktoriya Tomova 2489 155
6 Evgeniya Rodina / Kamilla Rakhimova 1345 167
7 Rosalie Van Der Hoek / Rebecca Peterson 222 176
8 Maryna Zanevska / Ysaline Bonaventure 472 177
9 Ingrid Martins / Andrea Gamiz 182 182
10 Angelina Gabueva / Anastasia Zakharova 193 193

by ti-amie UPDATED ATP MD Singles Entry Lists

Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Carlos Alcaraz 1 1
2 Rafael Nadal 2 2
3 Casper Ruud 3 3
4 Stefanos Tsitsipas 4 4
5 Novak Djokovic 5 5
6 Felix Auger-Aliassime 6 6
7 Daniil Medvedev 7 7
8 Andrey Rublev 8 8
9 Taylor Fritz 9 9
10 Hubert Hurkacz 10 10
11 Holger Rune 11 11
12 Alexander Zverev 12 12
13 Pablo Carreno Busta 13 13
14 Cameron Norrie 14 14
15 Jannik Sinner 15 15
16 Matteo Berrettini 16 16
17 Marin Cilic 17 17
18 Denis Shapovalov 18 18
19 Frances Tiafoe 19 19
20 Karen Khachanov 20 20
21 Roberto Bautista Agut 21 21
22 Nick Kyrgios 22 22
23 Lorenzo Musetti 23 23
24 Alex de Minaur 24 24
25 Diego Schwartzman 25 25
26 Borna Coric 26 26
27 Daniel Evans 27 27
28 Grigor Dimitrov 28 28
29 Miomir Kecmanovic 29 29
30 Francisco Cerundolo 30 30
31 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 31 31
32 Tommy Paul 32 32
Sebastian Korda 33 33
Maxime Cressy 34 34
Botic van de Zandschulp 35 35
Yoshihito Nishioka 36 36
Alexander Bublik 37 37
Reilly Opelka 38 38
Albert Ramos-Vinolas 39 39
Emil Ruusuvuori 40 40
John Isner 41 41
Jack Draper 42 42
Sebastian Baez 43 43
Arthur Rinderknech 44 44
Lorenzo Sonego 45 45
Adrian Mannarino 46 46
Brandon Nakashima 47 47
Jenson Brooksby 48 48
Andy Murray 49 49
Alex Molcan 50 50
Corentin Moutet 51 51
David Goffin 53 53
Filip Krajinovic 54 54
Fabio Fognini 55 55
Marc-Andrea Huesler 56 56
Pedro Cachin 57 57
Jaume Munar 58 58
Aslan Karatsev 59 59
Benjamin Bonzi 60 60
Marcos Giron 61 61
Pedro Martinez 62 62
Mackenzie McDonald 63 63
Quentin Halys 64 64
Constant Lestienne 65 65
J.J. Wolf 66 66
Daniel Elahi Galan 67 67
Richard Gasquet 68 68
Mikael Ymer 69 69
Laslo Djere 70 70
Thiago Monteiro 71 71
Bernabe Zapata Miralles 72 72
Ilya Ivashka 73 73
Roberto Carballes Baena 74 74
Federico Coria 75 75
Oscar Otte 76 76
Christopher O'Connell 78 78
Tomas Martin Etcheverry 79 79
Dusan Lajovic 80 80
Jiri Lehecka 81 81
Joao Sousa 82 82
Soonwoo Kwon 83 83
Jordan Thompson 84 84
Cristian Garin 85 85
Ugo Humbert 86 86
Marton Fucsovics 87 88
Roman Safiullin 88 89
Facundo Bagnis 89 90
Gregoire Barrere 90 91
Nikoloz Basilashvili 91 92
Taro Daniel 92 93
Thanasi Kokkinakis 93 94
Daniel Altmaier 94 95
Tallon Griekspoor 95 96
Ben Shelton 96 97
Tomas Machac 97 98
Vasek Pospisil 98 100
(WC) Jason Kubler 107
Nuno Borges 112 99
Chun-Hsin Tseng 115 87
(WC) Alexei Popyrin 120
(WC) Christopher Eubanks 123
Hugo Dellien 132 73 (PR)
(WC) Luca Van Assche 137
Stan Wawrinka 148 22 (PR)
(WC) Rinky Hijikata 164
Lloyd Harris 237 47 (PR)
Kyle Edmund 582 48 (PR)
Guido Pella - 75 (PR)
Jeremy Chardy - 88 (PR)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Zhizhen Zhang 99 101
2 Attila Balazs 718 101 (PR)
3 Alejandro Tabilo 100 102
4 Pavel Kotov 117 103
5 Marco Cecchinato 101 104
6 Dominic Thiem 102 105
7 Radu Albot 103 106
8 Emilio Gomez 104 107
9 Juan Pablo Varillas 105 108
10 Denis Kudla 106 109
11 Jason Kubler 107 110
12 Hugo Gaston 108 111
13 Jiri Vesely 109 112
14 Steve Johnson 110 113
15 Tim van Rijthoven 111 114
16 Michael Mmoh 113 115
17 Norbert Gombos 114 116
18 Yibing Wu 116 117
19 Dominic Stricker 118 118
20 Francesco Passaro 119 120

Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Gael Monfils 52 52
Kamil Majchrzak 77 77

by ti-amie ATP Qualifying Entry Lists

Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Zhizhen Zhang 99 99
2 Alejandro Tabilo 100 100
3 Marco Cecchinato 101 101
4 Radu Albot 103 103
5 Emilio Gomez 104 104
6 Juan Pablo Varillas 105 105
7 Denis Kudla 106 106
8 Hugo Gaston 108 108
9 Tim van Rijthoven 111 111
10 Michael Mmoh 113 113
11 Norbert Gombos 114 114
12 Yibing Wu 116 116
13 Pavel Kotov 117 117
14 Dominic Stricker 118 118
15 Francesco Passaro 119 119
16 Pablo Andujar 121 121
17 Jurij Rodionov 122 122
18 Christopher Eubanks 123 123
19 Fernando Verdasco 124 124
20 Federico Delbonis 125 125
21 Elias Ymer 127 127
22 Yannick Hanfmann 128 128
23 Zizou Bergs 129 129
24 Aleksandar Vukic 130 130
25 Jelle Sels 133 133
26 Matteo Arnaldi 134 134
27 Luca Nardi 135 135
28 Lukas Klein 136 136
29 Jozef Kovalik 138 138
30 Franco Agamenone 139 139
31 Vit Kopriva 140 140
32 Hugo Grenier 141 141
Timofey Skatov 142 142
Yosuke Watanuki 145 145
Manuel Guinard 146 146
John Millman 147 147
Filip Misolic 149 149
Jan-Lennard Struff 150 150
Nicolas Jarry 152 152
Mattia Bellucci 153 153
Alexander Shevchenko 154 154
James Duckworth 155 155
Gijs Brouwer 156 156
Leandro Riedi 157 157
Aleksandar Kovacevic 158 158
Maximilian Marterer 159 159
Alexandre Muller 160 160
Giulio Zeppieri 161 161
Zsombor Piros 162 162
Liam Broady 163 163
Carlos Taberner 165 165
Felipe Meligeni Alves 166 166
Ryan Peniston 167 167
Alexander Ritschard 169 169
Geoffrey Blancaneaux 170 170
Flavio Cobolli 171 171
Henri Laaksonen 172 172
Fabian Marozsan 173 173
Enzo Couacaud 174 174
Otto Virtanen 175 175
Facundo Mena 176 176
Juan Pablo Ficovich 177 177
Emilio Nava 178 178
Benoit Paire 179 179
Andrea Pellegrino 181 181
Renzo Olivo 182 182
Antoine Bellier 183 183
Tung-Lin Wu 184 184
Oleksii Krutykh 185 185
Damir Dzumhur 186 186
Riccardo Bonadio 187 187
Mikhail Kukushkin 188 188
Adrian Andreev 189 189
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 190 190
Facundo Diaz Acosta 191 191
Juncheng Shang 192 192
Sebastian Ofner 193 193
Raul Brancaccio 194 194
Nicolas Kicker 195 195
Dimitar Kuzmanov 196 196
Kaichi Uchida 197 197
Stefan Kozlov 198 198
Dominik Koepfer 199 199
Francesco Maestrelli 200 200
Frederico Ferreira Silva 201 201
Nick Hardt 202 202
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 203 203
Laurent Lokoli 204 204
Antoine Escoffier 205 205
Luciano Darderi 206 206
Alexis Galarneau 207 207
Rio Noguchi 208 208
Evan Furness 209 209
Li Tu 210 210
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 211 211
Gianluca Mager 212 212
Andrea Vavassori 213 213
Mitchell Krueger 214 214
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran 215 215
Lukas Rosol 216 216
Brandon Holt 217 217
Kimmer Coppejans 218 218
Paul Jubb 219 219
Yu Hsiou Hsu 220 220
Max Purcell 221 221
Dalibor Svrcina 222 222
Marco Trungelliti 223 223
Genaro Alberto Olivieri 224 224
Thiago Agustin Tirante 225 225
Ernesto Escobedo 226 226
Gabriel Diallo 227 227
Omar Jasika 228 228
Nicholas David Ionel 229 229
Egor Gerasimov 278 173 (PR)
Marc Polmans 332 209 (PR)
Alex Bolt 637 203 (PR)
Roberto Marcora 686 216 (PR)
Bradley Klahn 876 145 (PR)
Yuichi Sugita 913 142 (PR)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)
(WC)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Tomas Barrios Vera 230 230
2 Nikola Milojevic 231 231
3 Gastao Elias 232 232
4 Miljan Zekic 233 233
5 Nino Serdarusic 234 234
6 Peter Gojowczyk 235 235
7 Altug Celikbilek 236 236
8 Skander Mansouri 238 238
9 Roman Andres Burruchaga 239 239
10 Thai-Son Kwiatkowski 1487 240 (PR)
11 Nerman Fatic 241 241
12 Ivan Gakhov 242 242
13 Mariano Navone 243 243
14 Nam Hoang Ly 244 244
15 Kacper Zuk 245 245
16 Andrea Collarini 246 246
17 Zdenek Kolar 247 247
18 Jan Choinski 248 248
19 Dane Sweeny 249 249
20 Arthur Fils 250 250
21 Seong-chan Hong 252 252
22 Juan Bautista Torres 253 253
23 Michael Geerts 254 254
24 Hamad Medjedovic 255 255
25 Harold Mayot 256 256
26 Hernan Casanova 257 257
27 Robin Haase 258 258
28 Nicolas Mejia 259 259
29 Daniel Michalski 260 260
30 Christian Harrison 344 260 (PR

Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Jason Kubler 107 107 (WC to MD)
Alexei Popyrin 120 120 (WC to MD)
Rinky Hijikata 164 164 (WC to MD)

by ti-amie Doubles MD Entry Lists

Seed* Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Wesley Koolhof / Neal Skupski 2 2
2 Rajeev Ram / Joe Salisbury 7 7
3 Marcelo Arevalo / Jean-Julien Rojer 12 12
4 Nikola Mektic / Mate Pavic 13 13
5 Ivan Dodig / Austin Krajicek 19 19
6 Lloyd Glasspool / Harri Heliovaara 23 23
7 Thanasi Kokkinakis / Nick Kyrgios 28 28
8 Marcel Granollers / Horacio Zeballos 31 31
9 Simone Bolelli / Fabio Fognini 44 44
10 Rohan Bopanna / Matthew Ebden 45 45
11 Jamie Murray / Michael Venus 52 52
12 Juan Sebastian Cabal / Robert Farah 58 58
13 Rafael Matos / David Vega Hernandez 58 58
14 Santiago Gonzalez / Edouard Roger-Vasselin 60 60
15 Andreas Mies / John Peers 61 61
16 Nicolas Mahut / Tim Puetz 66 66
Robin Haase / Matwe Middelkoop 66 66
Hugo Nys / Jan Zielinski 75 75
Maximo Gonzalez / Andres Molteni 83 83
Nathaniel Lammons / Jackson Withrow 95 95
Andrey Golubev / Aleksandr Nedovyesov 97 97
Tomislav Brkic / Gonzalo Escobar 98 98
Nicolas Barrientos / Ariel Behar 107 107
Alexander Erler / Lucas Miedler 107 107
Sadio Doumbia / Fabien Reboul 112 112
Hans Hach Verdugo / John Isner 119 119
Sander Gille / Joran Vliegen 121 121
Nikola Cacic / Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi 131 131
Ramkumar Ramanathan / Miguel Angel Reyes-Varela 134 134
Julian Cash / Henry Patten 139 139
Guillermo Duran / Philipp Oswald 144 144
Marcelo Demoliner / Andrea Vavassori 176 113
Francisco Cabral / Joao Sousa 196 136
Maxime Cressy / Albano Olivetti 207 100
Petros Tsitsipas / Stefanos Tsitsipas 218 149
Lloyd Harris / Raven Klaasen 221 102
Alexander Bublik / John-Patrick Smith 255 122
Quentin Halys / Adrian Mannarino 277 110
Andre Goransson / Marc-Andrea Huesler 363 131
Miomir Kecmanovic / Soonwoo Kwon 411 112
Ben McLachlan / Yoshihito Nishioka 427 115
Francisco Cerundolo / Tomas Martin Etcheverry 448 109
Max Purcell / Jordan Thompson 494 117
Benjamin Bonzi / Arthur Rinderknech 546 104
Aslan Karatsev / Dusan Lajovic 744 139
Marcos Giron / Constant Lestienne 855 126
Albert Ramos-Vinolas / Bernabe Zapata Miralles 902 111
Diego Hidalgo / Emil Ruusuvuori 918 120
Pedro Cachin / Guido Pella 1299 132
Jiri Lehecka / Alex Molcan 1706 131
Jeremy Chardy / Fabrice Martin - 115
Sebastian Baez / Luis David Martinez - 143
Federico Coria / Diego Schwartzman - 100
Ilya Ivashka / Oscar Otte - 149
Roberto Carballes Baena / Hugo Dellien - 147
Daniel Elahi Galan / Thiago Monteiro - 138
Laslo Djere / Filip Krajinovic - 124
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -

Alternates (Advanced)
Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Hunter Reese / Cristian Rodriguez 165 165
2 Robert Galloway / David Pel 173 173
3 Marcelo Demoliner / Andrea Vavassori 176 176
4 Yuki Bhambri / Saketh Myneni 180 180
5 Ivan Sabanov / Matej Sabanov 181 181
6 Daniel Altmaier / Facundo Bagnis 899 183
7 Sander Arends / Tallon Griekspoor 318 199
8 Roberto Carballes Baena / Hugo Dellien - 206
9 Marco Bortolotti / Fabian Fallert 216 216
10 Lloyd Harris / Raven Klaasen 221 221
11 N.Sriram Balaji / Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan 227 227
12 Ruben Gonzales / Treat Huey 232 232
13 Alex Lawson / Artem Sitak 242 242
14 Rinky Hijikata / Jason Kubler 437 271
15 Patrik Niklas-Salminen / Bart Stevens 276 276
16 John Millman / Aleksandar Vukic 1903 277
17 Alex Bolt / Luke Saville 1347 280
18 Marc Polmans / Alexei Popyrin 731 281
19 Boris Arias / Federico Zeballos 309 309
20 JiSung Nam / MinKyu Song 335 335

by ashkor87 Venus has withdrawn too, unspecified injury

by ti-amie UPDATED ATP MD SINGLES ENTRY LISTS

Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking
1 Rafael Nadal 2 2
2 Casper Ruud 3 3
3 Stefanos Tsitsipas 4 4
4 Novak Djokovic 5 5
5 Felix Auger-Aliassime 6 6
6 Daniil Medvedev 7 7
7 Andrey Rublev 8 8
8 Taylor Fritz 9 9
9 Hubert Hurkacz 10 10
10 Holger Rune 11 11
11 Alexander Zverev 12 12
12 Pablo Carreno Busta 13 13
13 Cameron Norrie 14 14
14 Jannik Sinner 15 15
15 Matteo Berrettini 16 16
16 Marin Cilic 17 17
17 Denis Shapovalov 18 18
18 Frances Tiafoe 19 19
19 Karen Khachanov 20 20
20 Roberto Bautista Agut 21 21
21 Nick Kyrgios 22 22
22 Lorenzo Musetti 23 23
23 Alex de Minaur 24 24
24 Diego Schwartzman 25 25
25 Borna Coric 26 26
26 Daniel Evans 27 27
27 Grigor Dimitrov 28 28
28 Miomir Kecmanovic 29 29
29 Francisco Cerundolo 30 30
30 Alejandro Davidovich Fokina 31 31
31 Tommy Paul 32 32
32 Sebastian Korda 33 33
Maxime Cressy 34 34
Botic van de Zandschulp 35 35
Yoshihito Nishioka 36 36
Alexander Bublik 37 37
Albert Ramos-Vinolas 39 39
Emil Ruusuvuori 40 40
John Isner 41 41
Jack Draper 42 42
Sebastian Baez 43 43
Arthur Rinderknech 44 44
Lorenzo Sonego 45 45
Adrian Mannarino 46 46
Brandon Nakashima 47 47
Jenson Brooksby 48 48
Andy Murray 49 49
Alex Molcan 50 50
Corentin Moutet 51 51
David Goffin 53 53
Filip Krajinovic 54 54
Fabio Fognini 55 55
Marc-Andrea Huesler 56 56
Pedro Cachin 57 57
Jaume Munar 58 58
Aslan Karatsev 59 59
Benjamin Bonzi 60 60
Marcos Giron 61 61
Pedro Martinez 62 62
Mackenzie McDonald 63 63
Quentin Halys 64 64
Constant Lestienne 65 65
J.J. Wolf 66 66
Daniel Elahi Galan 67 67
Richard Gasquet 68 68
Mikael Ymer 69 69
Laslo Djere 70 70
Thiago Monteiro 71 71
Bernabe Zapata Miralles 72 72
Ilya Ivashka 73 73
Roberto Carballes Baena 74 74
Federico Coria 75 75
Oscar Otte 76 76
Christopher O'Connell 78 78
Tomas Martin Etcheverry 79 79
Dusan Lajovic 80 80
Jiri Lehecka 81 81
Joao Sousa 82 82
Soonwoo Kwon 83 83
Jordan Thompson 84 84
Cristian Garin 85 85
Ugo Humbert 86 86
Marton Fucsovics 87 88
Roman Safiullin 88 89
Facundo Bagnis 89 90
Gregoire Barrere 90 91
Nikoloz Basilashvili 91 92
Taro Daniel 92 93
Thanasi Kokkinakis 93 94
Daniel Altmaier 94 95
Tallon Griekspoor 95 96
Ben Shelton 96 97
Tomas Machac 97 98
Vasek Pospisil 98 100
Zhizhen Zhang 99 101
(WC) Dominic Thiem 102
(WC) Jason Kubler 107
Nuno Borges 112 99
Chun-Hsin Tseng 115 87
(WC) Yibing Wu 116
(WC) Alexei Popyrin 120
(WC) Christopher Eubanks 123
Hugo Dellien 132 73 (PR)
(WC) Luca Van Assche 139
(WC) John Millman 147
Stan Wawrinka 148 22 (PR)
(WC) Rinky Hijikata 164
Lloyd Harris 237 47 (PR)
Kyle Edmund 582 48 (PR)
Attila Balazs 718 101 (PR)
Guido Pella - 75 (PR)
Jeremy Chardy - 88 (PR)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Alejandro Tabilo 100 102
2 Pavel Kotov 117 103
3 Marco Cecchinato 101 104
5 Radu Albot 103 106
6 Emilio Gomez 104 107
7 Juan Pablo Varillas 105 108
8 Denis Kudla 106 109
10 Hugo Gaston 108 111
11 Jiri Vesely 109 112
12 Steve Johnson 110 113
13 Tim van Rijthoven 111 114
14 Michael Mmoh 113 115
15 Norbert Gombos 114 116
17 Dominic Stricker 118 118
18 Francesco Passaro 119 120
20 Pablo Andujar 121 122

Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Carlos Alcaraz 1 1
Reilly Opelka 38 38
Gael Monfils 52 52
Kamil Majchrzak 77 77

by ti-amie UPDATED ATP QUALIFYING ENTRY LISTS

Entries
Seed Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Alejandro Tabilo 100 100
2 Marco Cecchinato 101 101
3 Radu Albot 103 103
4 Emilio Gomez 104 104
5 Juan Pablo Varillas 105 105
6 Denis Kudla 106 106
7 Hugo Gaston 108 108
8 Tim van Rijthoven 111 111
9 Michael Mmoh 113 113
10 Norbert Gombos 114 114
11 Pavel Kotov 117 117
12 Dominic Stricker 118 118
13 Francesco Passaro 119 119
14 Pablo Andujar 121 121
15 Jurij Rodionov 122 122
16 Fernando Verdasco 124 124
17 Federico Delbonis 125 125
18 Elias Ymer 127 127
19 Yannick Hanfmann 128 128
20 Zizou Bergs 129 129
21 Aleksandar Vukic 130 130
22 Matteo Arnaldi 134 134
23 Luca Nardi 135 135
24 Lukas Klein 136 136
25 Jozef Kovalik 137 138
26 Franco Agamenone 138 139
27 Vit Kopriva 140 140
28 Hugo Grenier 141 141
29 Timofey Skatov 142 142
30 Yosuke Watanuki 145 145
31 Manuel Guinard 146 146
32 Filip Misolic 149 149
Jan-Lennard Struff 150 150
Nicolas Jarry 152 152
Mattia Bellucci 153 153
Alexander Shevchenko 154 154
James Duckworth 155 155
Gijs Brouwer 156 156
Leandro Riedi 157 157
Aleksandar Kovacevic 158 158
Maximilian Marterer 159 159
Alexandre Muller 160 160
Giulio Zeppieri 161 161
Zsombor Piros 162 162
Liam Broady 163 163
Carlos Taberner 165 165
Felipe Meligeni Alves 166 166
Ryan Peniston 167 167
Alexander Ritschard 169 169
Geoffrey Blancaneaux 170 170
Flavio Cobolli 171 171
Henri Laaksonen 172 172
Fabian Marozsan 173 173
Enzo Couacaud 174 174
Otto Virtanen 175 175
Facundo Mena 176 176
Juan Pablo Ficovich 177 177
Emilio Nava 178 178
Benoit Paire 179 179
Andrea Pellegrino 181 181
Renzo Olivo 182 182
Antoine Bellier 183 183
Tung-Lin Wu 184 184
Oleksii Krutykh 185 185
Damir Dzumhur 186 186
Riccardo Bonadio 187 187
Mikhail Kukushkin 188 188
Adrian Andreev 189 189
Santiago Rodriguez Taverna 190 190
Facundo Diaz Acosta 191 191
Juncheng Shang 192 192
Sebastian Ofner 193 193
Raul Brancaccio 194 194
Nicolas Kicker 195 195
Dimitar Kuzmanov 196 196
Kaichi Uchida 197 197
Stefan Kozlov 198 198
Francesco Maestrelli 200 200
Frederico Ferreira Silva 201 201
Nick Hardt 202 202
Cedrik-Marcel Stebe 203 203
Laurent Lokoli 204 204
Antoine Escoffier 205 205
Luciano Darderi 206 206
Alexis Galarneau 207 207
Rio Noguchi 208 208
Evan Furness 209 209
Li Tu 210 210
Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida 211 211
Gianluca Mager 212 212
Andrea Vavassori 213 213
Mitchell Krueger 214 214
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran 215 215
Lukas Rosol 216 216
Brandon Holt 217 217
Kimmer Coppejans 218 218
Paul Jubb 219 219
Max Purcell 220 221
Yu Hsiou Hsu 221 220
Dalibor Svrcina 222 222
Marco Trungelliti 223 223
Genaro Alberto Olivieri 224 224
Thiago Agustin Tirante 225 225
Ernesto Escobedo 226 226
Gabriel Diallo 227 227
Omar Jasika 228 228
Nicholas David Ionel 229 229
Tomas Barrios Vera 230 230
Nikola Milojevic 231 231
Gastao Elias 232 232
Miljan Zekic 233 233
Nino Serdarusic 234 234
Peter Gojowczyk 235 235
(WC) Dane Sweeny 249
Egor Gerasimov 278 173 (PR)
Marc Polmans 334 209 (PR)
(WC) Tristan Schoolkate 367
(WC) James McCabe 406
(WC) Adam Walton 432
(WC) Philip Sekulic 543
(WC) Bruno Kuzuhara 636
Alex Bolt 638 203 (PR)
(WC) Edward Winter 672
Roberto Marcora 685 216 (PR)
Bradley Klahn 872 145 (PR)
Yuichi Sugita 914 142 (PR)
(WC) Jeremy Jin 990
(WC) Derek Pham 1017

Alternates
Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Altug Celikbilek 236 236
2 Skander Mansouri 239 238
3 Thai-Son Kwiatkowski 1488 240 (PR)
4 Ivan Gakhov 242 242
5 Nam Hoang Ly 244 244
6 Andrea Collarini 246 246
8 Seong-chan Hong 252 252
9 Hernan Casanova 257 257
10 Robin Haase 258 258
11 Nicolas Mejia 259 259
12 Gonzalo Lama 261 261
13 Alessandro Giannessi 262 262
14 Jonas Forejtek 263 263
15 Oriol Roca Batalla 268 268
16 Bu Yunchaokete 277 277
17 Timo Stodder 279 279
18 Nicolas Alvarez Varona 284 284
19 Evan Zhu 291 289
20 Salvatore Caruso 294 294
21 Ugo Blanchet 295 295
22 Daniel Dutra da Silva 300 300
23 Filip Cristian Jianu 304 304
24 Gonzalo Villanueva 311 312
25 Alejandro Moro Canas 314 315
26 Ulises Blanch 318 319
27 Elmar Ejupovic 326 327
28 Murkel Dellien 327 328
29 Yunseong Chung 335 333
30 Max Houkes 330 338


Withdrawals
Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

Zhizhen Zhang 99 99
Jason Kubler 107 107 (To MD)
Yibing Wu 116 116 (To MD)
Alexei Popyrin 120 120 (To MD)
Christopher Eubanks 123 123 (To MD)
Jelle Sels 133 133
John Millman 147 147 (To MD)
Rinky Hijikata 164 164 (To MD)
Dominik Koepfer 199 199

by ti-amie UPDATED ATP DOUBLES ENTRY LISTS


Entries
Seed* Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking
1 Wesley Koolhof / Neal Skupski 2 2
2 Rajeev Ram / Joe Salisbury 7 7
3 Marcelo Arevalo / Jean-Julien Rojer 12 12
4 Nikola Mektic / Mate Pavic 13 13
5 Ivan Dodig / Austin Krajicek 19 19
6 Lloyd Glasspool / Harri Heliovaara 23 23
7 Thanasi Kokkinakis / Nick Kyrgios 28 28
8 Marcel Granollers / Horacio Zeballos 31 31
9 Simone Bolelli / Fabio Fognini 44 44
10 Rohan Bopanna / Matthew Ebden 45 45
11 Jamie Murray / Michael Venus 52 52
12 Juan Sebastian Cabal / Robert Farah 58 58
13 Rafael Matos / David Vega Hernandez 58 58
14 Santiago Gonzalez / Edouard Roger-Vasselin 60 60
15 Andreas Mies / John Peers 61 61
16 Nicolas Mahut / Tim Puetz 66 66
Robin Haase / Matwe Middelkoop 66 66
Hugo Nys / Jan Zielinski 75 75
Maximo Gonzalez / Andres Molteni 83 83
Nathaniel Lammons / Jackson Withrow 95 95
Andrey Golubev / Aleksandr Nedovyesov 97 97
Tomislav Brkic / Gonzalo Escobar 98 98
Nicolas Barrientos / Ariel Behar 107 107
Alexander Erler / Lucas Miedler 107 107
Sadio Doumbia / Fabien Reboul 112 112
Hans Hach Verdugo / John Isner 119 119
Sander Gille / Joran Vliegen 121 121
Nikola Cacic / Aisam-Ul-Haq Qureshi 131 131
Ramkumar Ramanathan / Miguel Angel Reyes-Varela 134 134
Julian Cash / Henry Patten 139 139
Guillermo Duran / Philipp Oswald 144 144
Marcelo Demoliner / Andrea Vavassori 176 113
Francisco Cabral / Joao Sousa 196 136
Maxime Cressy / Albano Olivetti 207 100
Petros Tsitsipas / Stefanos Tsitsipas 218 149
Lloyd Harris / Raven Klaasen 221 102
Alexander Bublik / John-Patrick Smith 255 122
Quentin Halys / Adrian Mannarino 277 110
Andre Goransson / Marc-Andrea Huesler 363 131
Miomir Kecmanovic / Soonwoo Kwon 411 112
Ben McLachlan / Yoshihito Nishioka 427 115
Francisco Cerundolo / Tomas Martin Etcheverry 447 109
Max Purcell / Jordan Thompson 495 117
Benjamin Bonzi / Arthur Rinderknech 548 104
Aslan Karatsev / Dusan Lajovic 743 139
Marcos Giron / Constant Lestienne 856 126
Albert Ramos-Vinolas / Bernabe Zapata Miralles 900 111
Diego Hidalgo / Emil Ruusuvuori 916 120
Pedro Cachin / Guido Pella 1300 132
Jiri Lehecka / Alex Molcan 1700 131
Jeremy Chardy / Fabrice Martin - 115
Sebastian Baez / Luis David Martinez - 143
Federico Coria / Diego Schwartzman - 100
Ilya Ivashka / Oscar Otte - 149
Roberto Carballes Baena / Hugo Dellien - 147
Daniel Elahi Galan / Thiago Monteiro - 138
Laslo Djere / Filip Krajinovic - 124
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -
(WC) -

Alternates (Advanced)
Names Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Hunter Reese / Cristian Rodriguez 165 165
3 Yuki Bhambri / Saketh Myneni 180 180
4 Ivan Sabanov / Matej Sabanov 181 181
5 Daniel Altmaier / Facundo Bagnis 897 183
6 Sander Arends / Tallon Griekspoor 318 199
8 Marco Bortolotti / Fabian Fallert 216 216
10 N.Sriram Balaji / Jeevan Nedunchezhiyan 227 227
11 Ruben Gonzales / Treat Huey 232 232
12 Alex Lawson / Artem Sitak 242 242
13 Rinky Hijikata / Jason Kubler 438 271
14 Patrik Niklas-Salminen / Bart Stevens 276 276
15 John Millman / Aleksandar Vukic 1904 277
16 Alex Bolt / Luke Saville 1352 280
17 Marc Polmans / Alexei Popyrin 733 281
18 Boris Arias / Federico Zeballos 309 309
19 JiSung Nam / MinKyu Song 335 335
20 Malek Jaziri / Vasek Pospisil - 340

by ti-amie UPDATED WTA MD ENTRY LISTS


Entries
Seed* Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking
1 Iga Swiatek 1 1
2 Ons Jabeur 2 2
3 Jessica Pegula 3 3
4 Caroline Garcia 4 4
5 Aryna Sabalenka 5 5
6 Maria Sakkari 6 6
7 Coco Gauff 7 7
8 Daria Kasatkina 8 8
9 Veronika Kudermetova 9 9
10 Madison Keys 11 11
11 Belinda Bencic 12 12
12 Paula Badosa 13 13
13 Danielle Collins 14 14
14 Beatriz Haddad Maia 15 15
15 Petra Kvitova 16 16
16 Anett Kontaveit 17 17
17 Jelena Ostapenko 18 18
18 Ekaterina Alexandrova 19 19
19 Liudmila Samsonova 20 20
20 Elena Rybakina 21 22
21 Barbora Krejcikova 22 21
22 Amanda Anisimova 23 23
23 Marie Bouzkova 24 25
24 Shuai Zhang 25 24
25 Victoria Azarenka 26 26
26 Martina Trevisan 27 28
27 Qinwen Zheng 28 27
28 Elise Mertens 29 29
29 Aliaksandra Sasnovich 30 30
30 Karolina Pliskova 31 31
31 Kaia Kanepi 32 32
32 Ajla Tomljanovic 33 33
Irina-Camelia Begu 34 34
Jil Teichmann 35 35
Alizé Cornet 36 36
Sloane Stephens 37 37
Petra Martic 38 39
Anhelina Kalinina 39 53
Leylah Fernandez 40 40
Alison Riske-Amritraj 41 41
Naomi Osaka 42 42
Anastasia Potapova 43 43
Bernarda Pera 44 44
Sorana Cirstea 45 38
Bianca Andreescu 46 45
Shelby Rogers 47 46
Magda Linette 48 49
Katerina Siniakova 49 47
Xiyu Wang 50 50
Yulia Putintseva 51 51
Mayar Sherif 52 52
Lucia Bronzetti 54 58
Garbiñe Muguruza 55 56
Ana Bogdan 56 48
Madison Brengle 57 59
Anna Kalinskaya 58 60
Claire Liu 59 61
Danka Kovinic 60 57
Jasmine Paolini 62 63
Rebecca Marino 63 65
Elisabetta Cocciaretto 64 66
Jule Niemeier 65 67
Camila Giorgi 66 68
Donna Vekic 67 69
Tatjana Maria 68 70
Marta Kostyuk 69 71
Nuria Parrizas Diaz 70 72
Tereza Martincova 71 73
Alison Van Uytvanck 72 55
Anna Blinkova 73 80
Tamara Korpatsch 74 74
Viktorija Golubic 76 76
Anna Bondar 77 79
Emma Raducanu 78 75
Linda Fruhvirtova 79 77
Camila Osorio 80 81
Maryna Zanevska 81 82
Julia Grabher 82 83
Dalma Galfi 83 84
Lin Zhu 84 64
Tamara Zidansek 85 85
Xinyu Wang 86 86
Lauren Davis 87 87
Panna Udvardy 88 88
Kaja Juvan 89 89
Viktoriya Tomova 90 90
Marketa Vondrousova 92 32 (SR)
Caty Mcnally 93 93
Kamilla Rakhimova 94 92
Ysaline Bonaventure 95 95
Yue Yuan 97 78
Harriet Dart 98 96
Kateryna Baindl 99 98
Varvara Gracheva 100 94
(WC) Diane Parry 111
(WC) Moyuka Uchijima 117
(WC) Taylor Townsend 133
Jaqueline Cristian 146 65 (SR)
Karolina Muchova 151 22 (SR)
(WC) Jaimee Fourlis 162
(WC) Kimberly Birrell 173
Laura Siegemund 176 57 (SR)
Nadia Podoroska 196 39 (SR)
(WC) Olivia Gadecki 202
Sofia Kenin 227 4 (SR)
(WC) Storm Hunter 241
Kristina Kucova 269 90 (SR)
(WC) Talia Gibson 341
Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova 367 21 (SR)
Evgeniya Rodina 439 73 (SR)
Patricia Maria Tig 790 65 (SR)
Saisai Zheng - 89 (SR)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)
(Q)

Alternates
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Dayana Yastremska 101 99
2 Alycia Parks 75 100
3 Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 103 101
4 Linda Noskova 102 102
5 Cristina Bucsa 105 104
6 Elena-Gabriela Ruse 116 105
8 Ana Konjuh 107 107
9 Sara Errani 108 108
11 Leolia Jeanjean 110 110
12 Reka Luca Jani 112 111
13 Diana Shnaider 109 112
14 Aleksandra Krunic 114 113
15 Katie Volynets 113 114
16 Kristina Mladenovic 152 115
17 Arantxa Rus 115 116
18 Laura Pigossi 118 117
19 Magdalena Frech 106 118
20 Rebecca Peterson 119 119

Withdrawals
Name Current Ranking Entry Ranking

Sara Sorribes Tormo 61 62
Qiang Wang 91 91

by ti-amie UPDATED WTA QUALIFYING ENTRY LISTS

Entries
Seed Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Alycia Parks 75 76
2 Dayana Yastremska 101 101
3 Linda Noskova 102 102
4 Anna Karolina Schmiedlova 103 103
5 Cristina Bucsa 105 105
6 Magdalena Frech 106 106
7 Ana Konjuh 107 108
8 Sara Errani 108 109
9 Diana Shnaider 109 111
10 Leolia Jeanjean 110 112
11 Reka Luca Jani 112 113
12 Katie Volynets 113 114
13 Arantxa Rus 115 116
14 Elena-Gabriela Ruse 116 117
15 Laura Pigossi 118 118
16 Rebecca Peterson 119 119
17 Anna-Lena Friedsam 120 120
18 Clara Burel 122 122
19 Marina Bassols Ribera 123 123
20 Ylena In-Albon 124 124
21 Simona Waltert 125 126
22 Elizabeth Mandlik 126 127
23 Eva Lys 127 128
24 Coco Vandeweghe 128 129
25 Ann Li 129 131
26 Rebeka Masarova 130 132
27 Jodie Burrage 131 133
28 Brenda Fruhvirtova 132 130
29 Viktoria Kuzmova 134 135
30 Erika Andreeva 135 136
31 Katie Boulter 136 137
32 Lesia Tsurenko 137 138
Nao Hibino 138 139
Heather Watson 139 141
Lucrezia Stefanini 140 142
Aliona Bolsova 141 143
Harmony Tan 142 144
Su Jeong Jang 143 140
Elsa Jacquemot 144 145
Katie Swan 145 146
Maria Carle 147 148
Daria Snigur 148 149
Caroline Dolehide 150 151
Kristina Mladenovic 152 125
Elina Avanesyan 153 154
Priscilla Hon 154 155
Olga Danilovic 155 156
Victoria Jimenez Kasintseva 156 157
Mirjam Bjorklund 157 158
Despina Papamichail 158 159
Katrina Scott 159 160
Na-Lae Han 160 153
Louisa Chirico 163 163
Chloe Paquet 164 164
Jessika Ponchet 165 165
Hailey Baptiste 166 166
Fernanda Contreras Gomez 167 167
Paula Ormaechea 168 168
Leyre Romero Gormaz 169 169
Asia Muhammad 170 171
Anastasia Zakharova 171 172
Misaki Doi 172 176
Irina Bara 174 174
Carol Zhao 175 190
Alexandra Cadantu-Ignatik 177 177
Vitalia Diatchenko 178 178
Maddison Inglis 179 179
Nigina Abduraimova 180 170
Sara Bejlek 181 180
Ipek Oz 182 181
Ashlyn Krueger 183 182
Sachia Vickery 184 189
Polina Kudermetova 185 183
Yuriko Miyazaki 186 212
Joanne Zuger 187 185
Selena Janicijevic 188 184
Oksana Selekhmeteva 189 187
Tara Wurth 190 186
Petra Marcinko 191 188
Katharina Hobgarski 192 191
Jessica Bouzas Maneiro 193 192
Robin Anderson 194 193
Katherine Sebov 195 223
Sinja Kraus 197 195
Kayla Day 198 196
Valentini Grammatikopoulou 199 197
Gabriela Lee 200 198
Suzan Lamens 201 199
Raluka Serban 203 201
Mai Hontama 204 202
Darya Astakhova 205 204
Barbora Palicova 206 205
Sonay Kartal 207 206
Marcela Zacarias 208 207
Carole Monnet 209 203
Magali Kempen 211 209
Irina Khromacheva 213 213
Eudice Chong 214 214
Alexandra Eala 215 215
Natalija Stevanovic 216 216
Carolina Alves 217 218
Anastasia Gasanova 218 219
Sophie Chang 219 220
Robin Montgomery 220 221
Rosa Vicens Mas 221 222
Ekaterine Gorgodze 222 224
Eva Vedder 223 225
Mona Barthel 224 226
Greet Minnen 225 227
Yuki Naito 226 210
Kathinka Von Deichmann 228 173 (SR)
Anastasia Tikhonova 229 231
(WC) Astra Sharma 233
Arianne Hartono 237 217
Ekaterina Reyngold 239 228
(WC) Lizette Cabrera 265
Arina Rodionova 302 207 (SR)
(WC) Alexandra Bozovic 307
(WC) Destanee Aiava 311
Katarina Zavatska 312 145 (SR)
Eugenie Bouchard 327 118 (SR)
(WC) Ellen Perez 364
(WC) Seone Mendez 375
(WC) Petra Hule 452
Barbara Haas 478 173 (SR)
(WC) Kaylah Mcphee 580
(WC) Elysia Bolton 681
Zoe Hives 772 142 (SR)

Alternates
Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

1 Ekaterina Makarova 230 232
2 Camilla Rosatello 232 234
4 Tessah Andrianjafitrimo 236 239
5 Tereza Mrdeza 534 239 (SR)
6 Storm Hunter 241 241
7 Jana Fett 242 242
8 Weronika Falkowska 246 247
9 Miriam Bulgaru 247 248
11 Darja Semenistaja 248 249
12 Natalia Szabanin 249 250
13 Lina Glushko 250 251
14 Joanna Garland 256 257
15 Jamie Loeb 259 259
16 Julia Riera 261 261
17 Danielle Lao 262 262
18 Audrey Albie 263 263
19 Sada Nahimana 264 265
21 Nuria Brancaccio 267 267
22 Cagla Buyukakcay 271 270
23 Emina Bektas 272 271
24 Justina Mikulskyte 275 273
25 Nina Potocnik 276 274
26 Whitney Osuigwe 281 277
27 Yuliya Hatouka 285 278
28 Yvonne Cavalle-Reimers 280 279
29 Pemra Ozgen 282 280
30 Andrea Lazaro Garcia 283 281


Withdrawals
Name Seeding Ranking Entry Ranking

Clara Tauson 96 96
Harriet Dart 98 98
Kateryna Baindl 99 99
Diane Parry 111 110
Moyuka Uchijima 117 107
Taylor Townsend 133 134
Maja Chwalinska 161 161
Jaimee Fourlis 162 162
Kimberly Birrell 173 173
Olivia Gadecki 202 200

by ti-amie There are no changes to the WTA Doubles Entry Lists at this time.

by Deuce Tauson is having a difficult time adapting to the pro tour. She seems to be often injured (or, at least, withdraws from tournaments often), and when she does play, the results are not encouraging.
She was the #1 Junior just 2 or 3 years ago, and was looking good to make a smooth transition to the pro level. Let's hope things improve for her soon.

by ashkor87 if someone withdraws now on the women's side, , what happens to Yastremska and Parks? do they get have a chance to get promoted from qualifying? or does it depend on which quota the person withdrawing is from? Wildcards, for instance?

by ponchi101 I think the WC went to another player, a young Aussie. I can't recall the name.

by ashkor87
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Jan 08, 2023 2:05 am I think the WC went to another player, a young Aussie. I can't recall the name.
so the WC is a separate quota... not fungible with the qualifiers, then

by ti-amie

by ashkor87 Yep, Osaka has withdrawn and Yastremska gets in...presumably because this is a 'regular draw' shuffle, not WCs etc.
Though the list above has Parks ranked higher than Yastremska...is that incorrect?

by skatingfan
ashkor87 wrote: Sun Jan 08, 2023 5:03 am Yep, Osaka has withdrawn and Yastremska gets in...presumably because this is a 'regular draw' shuffle, not WCs etc.
Though the list above has Parks ranked higher than Yastremska...is that incorrect?
Entry to the main draw would be based on the rankings from the six week entry list whereas entry to the qualifying draw is based on the most recent rankings available.

by ponchi101 No reason given by Naomi.
I don't recall who was it that recently said (here at the forum) that Naomi's days of playing may be over. Sadly, it looks that way.
I remember a few years ago we said she was the one player that looked certain to be a 10+ Slam winner. Little did we know.
I hope she will be back.

by ashkor87 A bit early since I don't even know what the AO court is like but...
Probability estimates- can be revised if people get injured:

Men:
Djokovic 70%
Medvedev 10
Kyrgios 5
Sinner 5
Tsitsipas 5
Field 5

Women:

Swiatek 50%
Garcia 15%
Sabalenka 15%
Samsonova 5%
Rybakina 5
Leylah 5
Field 5

by ponchi101 Djokovic - 70%. Yes, This is his. The rest of the field I will wait a bit.
Swiatet - 50%. No. Not after that easy loss to Pegula. She will be the favorite, but not at 50%.
Sabalenka: I say 20%. She looked good at the last tournament.
Leylah at 5%, Coco included in the field? When are you going to learn, Ashkor?! ;)
I say Coco at 10%, Leylah included in the field.

by JTContinental Also Pegula should be getting some of that percentage, as well

by ashkor87 If the court is quick, yes Pegula at 5%

by ashkor87
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 4:07 am Djokovic - 70%. Yes, This is his. The rest of the field I will wait a bit.
Swiatet - 50%. No. Not after that easy loss to Pegula. She will be the favorite, but not at 50%.
Sabalenka: I say 20%. She looked good at the last tournament.
Leylah at 5%, Coco included in the field? When are you going to learn, Ashkor?! ;)
I say Coco at 10%, Leylah included in the field.
We can agree to disagree on Leylah..Coco is not yet capable of winning a major, I estimate, though she will get there.i would rate Pegula's chances a bit higher than Coco, especially if the court is quick. Swiatek couldn't adjust in time to the fast court where she lost to Pegula..unlikely that the AO will be that quick, and anyway Swiatek will adjust...

by ponchi101 The Aussie has never had quick courts. It is the reason Djokovic excels there. He can get to everything and anything.
Pegula higher than Coco? Yes. The ranking says so, and she also had a good week at the United Cup.
And, on the women's side, the draw will matter a lot. There will be some players playing quality tennis that will be unseeded. Noskova could be one.

by ashkor87 On a slow court, anyone can get to anything and everything..Djokovic can get to balls even on a fast court, that is what makes his defense great.

by ashkor87 It is an interesting fact that Swiatek has won exactly 50% of the tournaments she played in last year, and 50% of the majors...

by nelslus
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Jan 09, 2023 4:40 pmNoskova could be one.
OH, Disciple of Suliso- have you no mercy?!?! :gorgeous:

(Moral of this story, especially for Tennis Divas-in-Training Newbies- don't play too much before a Slam.) (Good news is, I expect her to get over this, and have a solid career, at least.)

by ponchi101 She is not playing this week. So she is following your advice.
Serious here. If she qualifies (and she should) and she does not draw a top seed in 1R, she can make a 2R or 3R. But she is still young. No pressure or expectations yet.

by skatingfan
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:03 pm She is not playing this week. So she is following your advice.
Serious here. If she qualifies (and she should) and she does not draw a top seed in 1R, she can make a 2R or 3R. But she is still young. No pressure or expectations yet.
Noskova was playing this week - she lost in the first round of qualifying for the Australian Open.

by ponchi101 There goes my fabulous theory...

by nelslus
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 10, 2023 4:03 pm She is not playing this week. So she is following your advice.
Serious here. If she qualifies (and she should) and she does not draw a top seed in 1R, she can make a 2R or 3R. But she is still young. No pressure or expectations yet.
,,,,We can only assume that Suliso made you post this. :gorgeous:

PS: Seriously- there's ALWAYS pressure and expectations, every step of the way. From what I saw, Nosková looked exhausted, in addition to any stress. And, Alycia "I See Myself in the Top 10" Parks (Note to all players- do NOT add on self-imposed pressure ever!!) also was a hot-mess- her serve saved her in her match. I do hope Alycia has a huge career. But, just let it happen.

by Deuce Noskova was the #2 seed in qualifying, and lost her first match to Katherine Sebov of Canada. Sebov has been playing well of late.

It must be a difficult transition psychologically - from a Final vs. a top 10 player to a qualifying match in the blink of an eye.

by JTContinental Marin Cilic is out with a knee injury

by ti-amie

About 11p EST in the US

by ti-amie

by ti-amie They're doing the women's draw first.

by ti-amie


by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 Draper for the upset...

by dryrunguy Berretini/Murray first round is the standout for me. Horrible.

Rublev/Thiem is a close second.

by Deuce For people saying that some first round matches are 'brutal' or 'horrible' because they pit two notable players against each other... I don't see it as necessarily a bad thing. It could be viewed from the perspective of showing how strong the draws have become across the entire draw - and that's a positive thing, isn't it?

Ostapenko - Yastremska... it will be interesting to see which of the two demonstrates the most unsportsmanlike behaviour...
Bouzkova has a good chance of beating Andreescu...
Azarenka - Kenin is also interesting - can Kenin finally kickstart a comeback?
I'm hoping Caty McNally will do well here. She finished the season well last year, and finally started showing some of the form that people have been hoping to see from her. Tough first round in Badosa, though...

by Deuce This is ridiculous... but it's consistent with most of the world living in illusion and pretending that COVID basically no longer exists.
I imagine that medical professionals aren't very happy about it...

Australian Open (absence of) Rules Regarding COVID-19...

.


by ashkor87 Haven't seen much of Draper..what do folks here think of him?

by ponchi101
dryrunguy wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:33 am Berretini/Murray first round is the standout for me. Horrible.

Rublev/Thiem is a close second.
I say, bad luck for Murray and Thiem. Although I don't see Rublev going much further, I can't see Thiem beating him. He has been off the courts for a long time and decided not to play any warm ups. That lack of real match action, after coming from an injury, can only be conquered by the likes of the Big 3, not somebody like Thiem.
I can't see Murray beating Matteo. Right now, he simply does not have the movement to keep up with Berretttini.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:18 pm
I can't see Murray beating Matteo. Right now, he simply does not have the movement to keep up with Berretttini.
I'm not picking Andy to win, but he kept up with Matteo fine at the US Open. A hard fought, closely played match that was not something that looked like the game had passed Andy by by any stretch, he definitely had his chances.

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:17 am

I like both players, but don't understand Badosa-McNally getting a mention here. I can think of 3 or 4 matches more noteworthy than that one.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ashkor87 watching the Djokovic -Kyrgios exho on Rod Laver arena.. court looks sort of medium paced, they say the outside courts are faster. But I wouldn't call it slow.. maybe 5% faster than Adelaide..

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by shmrck14
ti-amie wrote: Mon Jan 16, 2023 2:07 am
Bring out the popcorn!

by Deuce In-match coaching is permitted this year here.
Last year, coaching was permitted in all tournaments except for the Majors, I believe.

I assume coaching will be allowed in the other Majors this year, as well.

by Deuce There seems to be a quality control problem with the Dunlop balls this year. Nadal has been complaining about them since he started practicing with them a few days ago, saying that they lose pressure too quickly.

Draper has just identified a couple of apparently 'dead' balls in his match vs. Nadal, and they were removed from play.

by ti-amie

by ashkor87 Rod Laver arena looks quite fast today ..maybe because it is Sabalenka! Cain looks quick too, players are struggling with timing..getting hurried...maybe Sinner/Leylah/Raducanu will do well...

by ti-amie

Taylor is not letting critics stop her from wearing cat suits.

by ti-amie

by Deuce
ti-amie wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:13 am
Kostyuk is at it again - refusing to shake hands with Russian and Belarusian opponents after a match.
"The ban comes after Ukrainian tennis player Marta Kostyuk said she would not shake hands with opponents from Russia and Belarus who she believes have not done enough to condemn the invasion."

She is free to do that... but this sort of prejudice and condemning people to guilt by association doesn't reflect well on her.

by ti-amie

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:18 pm
I can't see Murray beating Matteo. Right now, he simply does not have the movement to keep up with Berretttini.






by Jeff from TX
Deuce wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:29 am
ti-amie wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:13 am
Kostyuk is at it again - refusing to shake hands with Russian and Belarusian opponents after a match.
"The ban comes after Ukrainian tennis player Marta Kostyuk said she would not shake hands with opponents from Russia and Belarus who she believes have not done enough to condemn the invasion."

She is free to do that... but this sort of prejudice and condemning people to guilt by association doesn't reflect well on her.
Perhaps it doesn't, but given the news from Ukraine, I can hardly blame her.

by ponchi101
JazzNU wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 5:52 pm
ponchi101 wrote: Thu Jan 12, 2023 4:18 pm
I can't see Murray beating Matteo. Right now, he simply does not have the movement to keep up with Berretttini.





And I deserve it :P

by ti-amie When Murray didn't win it in three I figured Berrettini had it and started watching TV. I'm still surprised that he won.

by Owendonovan I sometimes think my TV has frozen when Swiatek serves.

by Deuce
Jeff from TX wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 6:41 pm
Deuce wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:29 am
ti-amie wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:13 am
Kostyuk is at it again - refusing to shake hands with Russian and Belarusian opponents after a match.
"The ban comes after Ukrainian tennis player Marta Kostyuk said she would not shake hands with opponents from Russia and Belarus who she believes have not done enough to condemn the invasion."

She is free to do that... but this sort of prejudice and condemning people to guilt by association doesn't reflect well on her.
Perhaps it doesn't, but given the news from Ukraine, I can hardly blame her.
I can - and do - blame her.
Saying that she is justified in her hatred of ALL Russians and Belarusians is like saying that hating ALL Mexicans (or any other group) is ok because you were robbed by a group of Mexicans (or any other group).

It's obviously incredibly difficult and heartbreaking to live through what Ukrainians are living through. None of us can begin to imagine what that is like.
But that does not justify throwing a blanket over all Russians or Belarusians and viewing them all as terrible people simply due to their birthing association.

This message board is rife with people complaining about unjustified prejudice, bias, and stereotyping, and saying how wrong it is - even creating it where it doesn't exist at times, just to be able to condemn it.
Sorry - but there is no excuse for any type of unjustified 'guilt by association'.

by Owendonovan Has anyone tried to orchestrate a pow wow with all the Ukrainian, Russian, and Belarussian players to figure out how to approach their situation? Seems they could certainly set an exceptional example globally if they came to some kind of understanding. Would Kostyuk really shine Rublev on?

by ti-amie
Nice one of MCOS

by Deuce
Owendonovan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:32 am Has anyone tried to orchestrate a pow wow with all the Ukrainian, Russian, and Belarussian players to figure out how to approach their situation? Seems they could certainly set an exceptional example globally if they came to some kind of understanding. Would Kostyuk really shine Rublev on?
For that to happen, those involved would have to be open to doing it.
I think it's safe to say that Kostyuk would not be open to it. I think it's equally safe to say that Kasatkina and Rublev would be open to it. I don't know who among the others (on both sides) would be open to it - but I would hope that most - and maybe all - would be.

Something like Kostyuk and Kasatkina playing doubles together would do far, far more good than Kostyuk's constant condemnation of everything and everyone Russian and Belarusian.
Someone in Kostyuk's life should teach her that.

by JazzNU
Owendonovan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:32 am Has anyone tried to orchestrate a pow wow with all the Ukrainian, Russian, and Belarussian players to figure out how to approach their situation? Seems they could certainly set an exceptional example globally if they came to some kind of understanding. Would Kostyuk really shine Rublev on?

If you haven't been keeping up, Kostyuk has been so annoying that she's managed to turn a good amount of fan sentiment against her. She's out for blood, not remotely reasonable.

I personally don't think it would be a good idea anyway. The players aren't involved and a move like this would make it seem like they are. They are powerless to stop the war.

by ti-amie

by Owendonovan
JazzNU wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 2:21 am
Owendonovan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:32 am Has anyone tried to orchestrate a pow wow with all the Ukrainian, Russian, and Belarussian players to figure out how to approach their situation? Seems they could certainly set an exceptional example globally if they came to some kind of understanding. Would Kostyuk really shine Rublev on?

If you haven't been keeping up, Kostyuk has been so annoying that she's managed to turn a good amount of fan sentiment against her. She's out for blood, not remotely reasonable.

I personally don't think it would be a good idea anyway. The players aren't involved and a move like this would make it seem like they are. They are powerless to stop the war.
I get the ax she's grinding, but she doesn't seem able to see how her approach is doing her no favors. As a Ukrainian, Russian, or Belarussian I don't think you can't be involved, no matter how benign. Idealistically, I like to think sport can bring together differing factions more easily than politics can/does. They are powerless, but shows of goodwill can't ever hurt.

by Jeff from TX
Deuce wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:12 am
Jeff from TX wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 6:41 pm
Deuce wrote: Tue Jan 17, 2023 2:29 am
Kostyuk is at it again - refusing to shake hands with Russian and Belarusian opponents after a match.
"The ban comes after Ukrainian tennis player Marta Kostyuk said she would not shake hands with opponents from Russia and Belarus who she believes have not done enough to condemn the invasion."

She is free to do that... but this sort of prejudice and condemning people to guilt by association doesn't reflect well on her.
Perhaps it doesn't, but given the news from Ukraine, I can hardly blame her.
I can - and do - blame her.
Saying that she is justified in her hatred of ALL Russians and Belarusians is like saying that hating ALL Mexicans (or any other group) is ok because you were robbed by a group of Mexicans (or any other group).

It's obviously incredibly difficult and heartbreaking to live through what Ukrainians are living through. None of us can begin to imagine what that is like.
But that does not justify throwing a blanket over all Russians or Belarusians and viewing them all as terrible people simply due to their birthing association.

This message board is rife with people complaining about unjustified prejudice, bias, and stereotyping, and saying how wrong it is - even creating it where it doesn't exist at times, just to be able to condemn it.
Sorry - but there is no excuse for any type of unjustified 'guilt by association'.
This will be my last post on this topic, as it may be veering off of tennis into something else. I will try to be brief and concise. First, I want to say that I appreciate your viewpoint and your opinion, Deuce. You say that you blame her, and that I am saying her hatred is justified. I don't say that it is justified - I say that it is understandable, and human. You are correct in that most of us cannot begin to imagine what is is like living through what Ukraine is going through. I will say that there is at least one of our members who knows what it is like, since he lives in Kharkiv.

I think that asking someone to rationally put aside their emotions when their homeland is under constant attack is perhaps asking too much when missiles and still bombarding the country and intense battles are being waged in many parts of the country. Kostyuk's father and her grandparents still live in Kiev from my understanding. And from what I understand, what Kostyuk wants is for Russian and Belarussian players to openly condemn the invasion. That seems to be a reasonable position (from her perspective) to ask for, as anyone playing at the top level has resources to do so safely. I get that they may never be able to return home without fear of arrest if they speak out - that is still a lesser price than many Ukrainian citizens are paying. And I believe that you get that, Deuce, since you were the one who created the War on Ukraine thread for our forum (for which I thank you).

In an ideal world, she could do what you request, but at this point, the realities of the war are obviously still too raw for her to be able to do that. You also say that this board is rife with people complaining about unjustified prejudice, bias and stereotyping and even creating it where it doesn't exist. Perhaps so, although that would be a discussion for another day. On that point, I want to say that I cannot know another person's lived experiences and reality and how those experiences have "colored" their world, for lack of a better metaphor. What I do know is that people that have experienced unjustified prejudice, bias and stereotyping may be hypersensitized to their environment. Perhaps that may lead some to jump to conclusions or not give another the benefit of the doubt when they see a perceived injustice in the world. In any case, I can try to see from that person's point of view and learn from it, even if I don't agree with it.

Yes, there should be no excuse for any type of unjustified 'guilt by association' - that being said, while it may not be right, it can be understandable. I hope that in these type of situations that I can have enough humility and compassion to recognize those type of situations when they occur. In any case, thank you for your posts and your dry sense of humor, (see Deuce's post on Osorio toughing Federer's name on the wall of champions when she was coming out for her match with Swiatek) which you don't show often enough.
Owendonovan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 2:35 am
JazzNU wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 2:21 am
Owendonovan wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 1:32 am Has anyone tried to orchestrate a pow wow with all the Ukrainian, Russian, and Belarussian players to figure out how to approach their situation? Seems they could certainly set an exceptional example globally if they came to some kind of understanding. Would Kostyuk really shine Rublev on?
If you haven't been keeping up, Kostyuk has been so annoying that she's managed to turn a good amount of fan sentiment against her. She's out for blood, not remotely reasonable.

I personally don't think it would be a good idea anyway. The players aren't involved and a move like this would make it seem like they are. They are powerless to stop the war.
I get the ax she's grinding, but she doesn't seem able to see how her approach is doing her no favors. As a Ukrainian, Russian, or Belarussian I don't think you can't be involved, no matter how benign. Idealistically, I like to think sport can bring together differing factions more easily than politics can/does. They are powerless, but shows of goodwill can't ever hurt.
Owen, what you recommend is also admirable/idealistic in the potential of sport to bring people together. Again, I think that the emotions are just too raw for that with the war ongoing. And I'm not sure how possible it is for any Ukrainian to remain entirely above the fray, so to speak, at this time. Let's also recognize that Kostyuk is only 20. Some veterans of war and conflict suffer PTSD and internal demons for years. I can't conceive how I would have approached a "Red Dawn" scenario at her age (or even today). While that does not give someone a free pass to do anything, this is not simply a case of poor sportsmanship because she lost a match.

Just my thoughts.

by Deuce
Jeff from TX wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 5:01 am This will be my last post on this topic, as it may be veering off of tennis into something else. I will try to be brief and concise. First, I want to say that I appreciate your viewpoint and your opinion, Deuce. You say that you blame her, and that I am saying her hatred is justified. I don't say that it is justified - I say that it is understandable, and human. You are correct in that most of us cannot begin to imagine what is is like living through what Ukraine is going through. I will say that there is at least one of our members who knows what it is like, since he lives in Kharkiv.

I think that asking someone to rationally put aside their emotions when their homeland is under constant attack is perhaps asking too much when missiles and still bombarding the country and intense battles are being waged in many parts of the country. Kostyuk's father and her grandparents still live in Kiev from my understanding. And from what I understand, what Kostyuk wants is for Russian and Belarussian players to openly condemn the invasion. That seems to be a reasonable position (from her perspective) to ask for, as anyone playing at the top level has resources to do so safely. I get that they may never be able to return home without fear of arrest if they speak out - that is still a lesser price than many Ukrainian citizens are paying. And I believe that you get that, Deuce, since you were the one who created the War on Ukraine thread for our forum (for which I thank you).

In an ideal world, she could do what you request, but at this point, the realities of the war are obviously still too raw for her to be able to do that. You also say that this board is rife with people complaining about unjustified prejudice, bias and stereotyping and even creating it where it doesn't exist. Perhaps so, although that would be a discussion for another day. On that point, I want to say that I cannot know another person's lived experiences and reality and how those experiences have "colored" their world, for lack of a better metaphor. What I do know is that people that have experienced unjustified prejudice, bias and stereotyping may be hypersensitized to their environment. Perhaps that may lead some to jump to conclusions or not give another the benefit of the doubt when they see a perceived injustice in the world. In any case, I can try to see from that person's point of view and learn from it, even if I don't agree with it.

Yes, there should be no excuse for any type of unjustified 'guilt by association' - that being said, while it may not be right, it can be understandable. I hope that in these type of situations that I can have enough humility and compassion to recognize those type of situations when they occur. In any case, thank you for your posts and your dry sense of humor, (see Deuce's post on Osorio toughing Federer's name on the wall of champions when she was coming out for her match with Swiatek) which you don't show often enough.

Just my thoughts.
Thank you, Jeff, for your eloquent thoughts.
Just as you wish to see more of my ‘dry humour’, I would like to see more of your well expressed thoughts - you obviously are a profound thinker - but you don’t post those thoughts here often enough. I hope the post above is not your ‘last post on the subject’ - because your perspective is both important and welcome.

I do understand where Kostyuk is coming from - and that is precisely why I don’t accept what she is saying and doing. Because it is blatantly unjust. Living through a terrible and unfair circumstance is not justification for a person to be unfair to others him/her self. Two wrongs do not make a right...

Indeed, she is only 20 years old. But she is extremely outspoken on this issue - and repeatedly so. As such, she is open to being criticized.
Further, because of her youth and inexperience, I would hope that a more mature and experienced person in her life - surely some exist - would sit her down and explain that two wrongs don’t make a right in any circumstance, and that fairness and being just and objective are things to strive for - again, in any circumstance.

You state that Kostyuk is asking for Russian and Belarusian players to publicly condemn the invasion (I can’t call it a war, as the term ‘war’ does not identify the more guilty of the two parties). Indeed, there was mention in the article I cited of her saying something to that effect. But it goes well beyond that for her...
She has openly declared several times that she wants ALL the Russian and Belarusian players to be banned from the tennis tours. And she has been very open in her hatred of ALL Russian and Belarusian people - simply due to their nationality. This is the very definition of unjustified prejudice and bias, and of pronouncing people guilty simply by association.
Last year, Kostyuk strongly and loudly objected to Azarenka’s participation in a ‘Playing for Ukraine’ exhibition because Azarenka is Belarusian. So here was Azarenka - a Belarusian athlete - willing to participate in a demonstration for peace in support of Ukraine - which is a rather obvious condemnation of the Russian invasion of Ukraine - and Kostyuk still wasn’t happy; she would not accept it. The ONLY justification for this position from Kostyuk would be if Azarenka had herself participated in the invasion of Ukraine.
So, no - obviously what Kostyuk is asking for from the Russian and Belarusian players is not simply a condemnation of the invasion. She seems to be totally and absolutely against their entire existence.

To condemn ALL Russian and Belarusian people as being just as guilty as are the soldiers who have physically and forcefully invaded Ukraine - and as being just as guilty as Putin himself - is irrational, unjustly prejudiced, disrespectful, and unfair. But that’s precisely what Kostyuk is doing consistently. And if she is going to do that, she’s going to have to accept the criticisms that come her way. And hopefully she will grow and learn from the criticisms that guilt by association and unjust prejudice is never right, no matter the circumstance.

by JazzNU
Are 'fluffier' tennis balls causing longer matches at the Australian Open?

Matt Walsh
Assistant Editor


MELBOURNE, Australia -- What's in a ball? Well, quite a lot, especially if you're Rafael Nadal at the Australian Open.

The 2022 champion and other top players are claiming this year's balls are vastly different to those which graced the courts last year.

Nadal's main complaint is that the balls don't spin as much as he's used to -- bad news for someone whose topspin is the envy of the Tour.

And he isn't the only top player who thinks the Dunlop balls have changed.

Novak Djokovic, following his opening round win over Spain's Roberto Carballes Baena, backed up Nadal's claims.

"I mean, [the balls are] different from last year," Djokovic told the media. "The longer you play, the more rallies you play, the fluffier or the bigger the ball becomes, and it's slower."

On Saturday, before the tournament began, Nadal complained about how the balls are not taking on the Spaniard's trademark level of spin. At the United Cup in Sydney before the Australian Open began, Nadal struggled, losing both matches he played to Australia's Alex De Minaur and Brit Cameron Norrie.

"They say [the balls are] the same, but the ball is worse quality, without a doubt," Nadal said at the time.

"I think it's a ball that don't get the same spin as usual. After a couple of hits, the ball lose the pressure. It's more difficult to hit with the right spin. But I think it's easier to play when you play flatter on the shots.

"But I need to live with it. I think I practiced enough with the ball to be ready for it."

Djokovic suspects that the fluffier, slower balls are leading to longer rallies..

"I saw that [Alexei] Popyrin is playing now over four hours. [Casper] Ruud played over three-and-a-half hours. I think we are going to see more of those longer duration of matches this year than we have maybe last year," Djokovic said.

"One of the biggest reasons will probably be the ball ... I don't think the speed of the surface has changed much. The outside courts are pretty quick. The stadium courts are a bit slower. But the ball is slower. So that affects the play."

Nadal's first-round opponent Jack Draper also agreed: "[The balls] seem to sort of start off, when they're new, flying a lot. Then all of a sudden they get quite fluffy. A couple of them went very soft very quickly. gave them to the ref."

On Tuesday, Andy Murray and Matteo Berrettini played a four hour and 49 minute match -- the third longest match of Murray's career. On Monday, 2022 Australian Open runner up Danielle Collins played the longest match of her career, spending three hours and three minutes on court against Anna Kalinskaya.

On Wednesday, Canadian Felix Auger-Aliassime approached the chair umpire mid-match to criticize the performance of the Dunlops.

"I don't want to complain about it but the balls are not bouncing. It's crazy. I mean, we're hitting normal but I dunno. I know [the chair umpire] can't do anything, but I dunno if it's the batch of cans. I've never seen it."

Overall, through Wednesday morning, nine men's matches out of the 55 played ticked beyond four hours.


https://www.espn.com/tennis/story/_/id/ ... alian-open

by ponchi101 I gather that Novak means that the balls are different from the year before last...

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 She seems to be different off court.
Now, about that cackle... :shock:

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jan 18, 2023 9:32 pm She seems to be different off court.
Now, about that cackle... :shock:
She comes across as a 21 or 22 year old coed to me when she's off court most times. Or a 23 or 24 year old grad still living that mostly carefree college life, roommate and partying included. Diametrically different vibe than what she gives on court.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

This may get deleted. Folks in tennis Twitter are asking why this is even being said.

by ponchi101 Because it is a silly joke? No harm in that?
(It is a bad joke, still not a crime).

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 2:44 am This may get deleted. Folks in tennis Twitter are asking why this is even being said.

Hilarious. Is it 1950? Thought that account would be above saying something asinine like that.



by Owendonovan In my world the problem is a gender reveal party. Truly one of the most idiotic things this millennium has brought us.

by JTContinental "Gender reveal" always sounds like a flasher to me

by JazzNU
Owendonovan wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 3:58 am In my world the problem is a gender reveal party. Truly one of the most idiotic things this millennium has brought us.
I saw the title before the photo and I thought it was going to be some kind of stupid fireworks exploding or something else that mirrored some of the more disastrous reveals. Not a pedestrian blue shirt and pink shorts.

It's astounding the destruction that has come from freaking gender reveals.

by Deuce If there is to be a 'gender reveal', it's getting closer to happening... he's currently ahead of Ruud 2 sets to love.

by ashkor87 really need to understand Jenson Brooksby's game.. it is a bit of a mystery to me thus far.. how on earth does he beat all these top layers?

by Fastbackss I saw a great summary of it so of course now I can't find it.

Said that Brooksby uses all of the court and keeps players pinned. Great tactician that also mixes up a little bit more than normal "robots. "

Brooksby dominated long rallies and made ruud hit absurd number of backhand.

by ponchi101 The BH is as solid as can be. All his strokes are ugly and weird, but the BH is a metronome. And Ruud decided to go to the BH and it did not pay.
But your point (Ashkor) is spot on. How does he get away with that?

by JazzNU Lucky Loser Michael Mmoh with the biggest win by far of his career



by JazzNU

by JazzNU

by ti-amie

There was that infamous picture of Murray from a few years ago that would answer this question...

by ashkor87 Enjoying watching Krejcikova's silky smooth game right now ...hope she can handle the heat, last year she wilted..

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jan 19, 2023 11:24 pm

There was that infamous picture of Murray from a few years ago that would answer this question...

Please bring back Jim Courier for these on-court interviews. Or the former female players that have done a nice job with them in the past, though I haven't gotten the feeling AO officials are all that open to that idea, always seems like it's a guy after the men's matches.

by ponchi101 Those of us that already picked Krejcikova in the SP, may have done way too early. She played a gorgeoeus match, and is hitting a solid ball.
May be the OTHER this year.

by ashkor87 That was a terrible, desultory interview by Fitzgerald..agree, Courier would be better..if you need an Aussie, there are plenty available .Stolle, Woodbridge...

by atlpam
ashkor87 wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 2:36 am That was a terrible, desultory interview by Fitzgerald..agree, Courier would be better..if you need an Aussie, there are plenty available .Stolle, Woodbridge...
They should have dispensed with the on court interview given the time the match finished. All I could think of was when they brought chairs out for Nadal and Djokovic after their marathon final. It was obvious Andy just wanted to get off the court and they kept asking him these long drawn out questions.

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 Roland Garros did what?
I mean, is that shade?

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 3:39 am Roland Garros did what?
I mean, is that shade?
No, the other slams cover each other. US Open being by far the best follow of the bunch year-round. Wimbledon posts the least, mostly about British players, I'm sure their account is currently an Andy tribute page.

by ponchi101 I meant about posting about the signed photographs. These are much better, but...
Ok, I will take your point. Nothing to see here.

by ponchi101 I don't think this was even posted.
Yesterday, in the Khachanov/Kubler match, there was a 70 strokes point. But, it was not spectacular. Neither one could hit pass the other.

by ashkor87 Next great match will be Rybakina versus Swiatek.. Rybakina is one of the few players (with Saba) capable of beating Iga - has enough pace and depth to make her go on the back foot. Rybakine has a 40% chance, I would say... hope she does it!

by Owendonovan I need someone to dump Djokovic out the tournament. Aside from my general distaste of him, I'd like to see someone win their first slam. I love players first slam reactions when won.

by skatingfan
Owendonovan wrote: Fri Jan 20, 2023 2:41 pm I need someone to dump Djokovic out the tournament. Aside from my general distaste of him, I'd like to see someone win their first slam. I love players first slam reactions when won.
I guess we'll see if the leg can hold up to 5 more matches, but best bet for a first time winner is at the US Open.

by ponchi101 Can somebody post a little about his injury? I have read nothing about it on the press, and because he has been playing during the Aussie night, I have not seen his matches (I am not going to stay up for him).
I mean, I obviously do not want him to win, but I still can't see him losing. Not here.

by nelslus I believe that Novax has a left hamstring injury. As is often the case, when tournaments are going on- I don't think he's said all that much more about his injury status? He did apparently tell the media that it's not good. Looks like he got some treatment for this during his most recent match. (Not that I've seen one minute of him actually playing. Pfffffffffft.)

by ti-amie What?


by ti-amie What?



The AO people deleted their tweet hence the screenshot.

by Owendonovan
ti-amie wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 12:10 am What?

Such a whiney little victim.

by ponchi101 Especially the hyperbole. Lynching.
I wonder if he even knows what that means.

by Deuce
ti-amie wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 12:10 am What?

It seems rather obvious to me that Djokovic is playing this up as a means of trying to get more sympathy/support for his PTPA.
As in 'The ATP treats players terribly, so we need a new, different entity to protect the players / ensure the players are respected'.

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 Sort of like, why the WTA, but not the ATP?
After two more shock results, women's tennis has a problem

On the men's side, Nadal is out, Murray is out, and Medvedev is out. On the women's side, Swiatek, Jabeur and Gauff. Seems like very similar situations and just a show of the parity that is engulfing both tours. But why this article? And why not a better article saying that BOTH tours are approaching this dilemma?

(And, no, I do not believe it is simple sexism. Too narrow an explanation).

by skatingfan
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:09 pm Sort of like, why the WTA, but not the ATP?
After two more shock results, women's tennis has a problem

On the men's side, Nadal is out, Murray is out, and Medvedev is out. On the women's side, Swiatek, Jabeur and Gauff. Seems like very similar situations and just a show of the parity that is engulfing both tours. But why this article? And why not a better article saying that BOTH tours are approaching this dilemma?

(And, no, I do not believe it is simple sexism. Too narrow an explanation).
I think the issue is more the headline, than the article. The article is bad, but the headline is worse.

by ponchi101 Yes. It is pretty bland. Nothing insightful.

by Deuce
skatingfan wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:59 pm
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 6:09 pm Sort of like, why the WTA, but not the ATP?
After two more shock results, women's tennis has a problem

On the men's side, Nadal is out, Murray is out, and Medvedev is out. On the women's side, Swiatek, Jabeur and Gauff. Seems like very similar situations and just a show of the parity that is engulfing both tours. But why this article? And why not a better article saying that BOTH tours are approaching this dilemma?

(And, no, I do not believe it is simple sexism. Too narrow an explanation).
I think the issue is more the headline, than the article. The article is bad, but the headline is worse.
ponchi101 wrote: Sun Jan 22, 2023 7:38 pm Yes. It is pretty bland. Nothing insightful.
Yeah - I saw the article, and was initially going to post it here... But after reading it and considering it, I concluded that it really didn't mention anything of significance.
The headline does make it seem like you're clicking into something interesting or insightful, but when you read it, there's not much there.
But I did like how it pointed out that the seedings on the men's side are an illusion because of Djokovic... and that Rybakina did not come out of nowhere to beat Swiatek.

by ti-amie Sound on


by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Sat Jan 21, 2023 3:10 am Especially the hyperbole. Lynching.
I wonder if he even knows what that means.

Personally, I have a hard time giving Novak a pass on language. He speaks exceptional English (and several other languages), better than some native speakers. I have never seen a serious topic come up and he asks to answer in Serbian to make sure his message is conveyed properly like others have done because he has that level of command of the language.

by ashkor87 Djokovic seemed perfectly fine as he destroyed De Minaur...
Revised probability estimate:
Djokovic 90%
Korda 5%
The field 5%

by ti-amie
ashkor87 wrote: Mon Jan 23, 2023 2:50 pm Djokovic seemed perfectly fine as he destroyed De Minaur...
Revised probability estimate:
Djokovic 90%
Korda 5%
The field 5%
I hope you see the posts in the Day 8 thread specifically Djokovic talking about his injury.

by ti-amie

by JazzNU Ish was straight up weird.

by ponchi101 Somebody watched Finding Nemo a few times too many?

by ti-amie

by ti-amie



by JazzNU He's exhausting. Such a persecution complex. We question plenty of other player's injuries Novak. Especially when they go on and on about an injury, and then are ready to play next tournament and the one after that and the one after that. How injured were you really? Certainly not enough for the level of conversation surrounding the injury. Emma is a women's player that has definitely been questioned by fans as much if not more recently about injuries like that. Badosa is getting some talk in this area lately. Yastremska potentially the all timer in this area, cause she was just straight up faking time and time again and everyone knows it. You're not special Novak, we question many an injury that seems amiss and are just taking advantage of the rules or are poor sports and can't lose gracefully.

by skatingfan There was a discussion just yesterday/today about the injury time out that Holger Rune took in his match.

by ti-amie Rune is really making a good impression on long time tennis fans.


by ponchi101 Novak's injuries.
When Rafa injured his abs at Wimby, his service speed dropped into the 70's (MPH). Here at the Aussie, he could not move.
Andy's injuries: just check the MRI's. Visible proof.
Roger's? Yes, retirement. No need to check anything else.
Novak's? He just plastered a verifiable road runner (and world # 24) 1, 2 & 2 (or something like that). But he wonders why he gets questioned.
"Oh, I'm legally blind. I can barely see" said the Olympic Archery champion, when receiving his gold medal. Yep.
(Plus everything else said here. Heck, I have an Excel sheet with Badosa's retirements, and last year I worked the frequency of retirements in the ATP and WTA since 2000. So much for not questioning).

by ashkor87 Djokovic needs to check this forum I guess!

by ashkor87
ti-amie wrote: Mon Jan 23, 2023 4:16 pm
ashkor87 wrote: Mon Jan 23, 2023 2:50 pm Djokovic seemed perfectly fine as he destroyed De Minaur...
Revised probability estimate:
Djokovic 90%
Korda 5%
The field 5%
I hope you see the posts in the Day 8 thread specifically Djokovic talking about his injury.
No, must have missed that .?! I don't check the results thread since I am out of the SP very early (Goffin)

by ashkor87 Rublev vs Djoko tomorrow...feels like a finals...

by skatingfan
ashkor87 wrote: Tue Jan 24, 2023 11:13 am Rublev vs Djoko tomorrow...feels like a finals...
Djokovic vs Tsitsipas - rematch of the 2021 French Open final - hopefully it will have a high level of play.

by ponchi101 Djokovic will take about 1/2 set to neutralize Rublev's bullets. A close first set, then two routine ones.
Djokovic-Tsitsipas. That RG final indeed will be in the back of their minds. Like this:
"I gave you two sets and a break last time, and you couldn't. So, no..."
"I had two sets and a break last time, and I couldn't. So... DAD!!!!!!!!!! :cry: "

(Needless to say, I so hope to have to eat my words)

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 24, 2023 4:01 pm Djokovic will take about 1/2 set to neutralize Rublev's bullets. A close first set, then two routine ones.
Nah, it'll be harder than that for Novak. You know, his hamstring is injured. /s

by JazzNU

by ashkor87 In the last major of her illustrious career, Sania has reached the finals of the mixed, with Bopanna.
..so happy for her..

by Fastbackss I thought about picking her for that reason in predictions, but alas did not.

by ponchi101
JazzNU wrote: Wed Jan 25, 2023 5:51 am
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 24, 2023 4:01 pm Djokovic will take about 1/2 set to neutralize Rublev's bullets. A close first set, then two routine ones.
Nah, it'll be harder than that for Novak. You know, his hamstring is injured. /s
I got it exactly backwards.
Whatever we say about the man: he plays tennis at another level than the rest of the field, at least here in Australia. That he went like that against a top 5 seed shows how far the Next Gen, and the previous Next Gen, and the any Gen have to go.
They will never beat him. Age will beat him.

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Mon Jan 23, 2023 9:52 pm

This comment x 1000. Hamstring injury my ass. What Djokocic looked like last night:


Image

by ponchi101 Why doesn't he talk to a PR person? Injured people don't beat other top players by the scores he has been beating them. Plus, I am sure that somebody in Madison Avenue has a metric of how people see him. And, fair or not, he has a public profile, some of which came from the years in which he retired with frequency from tournaments. So, lay low. Say nothing about the injury, play your matches. But it will never look good when somebody claims they are facing a disadvantage and then they plaster a fellow player |1,2 & 4.
And, a hamstring? He should not be able to run, at all.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Wed Jan 25, 2023 10:08 pm Why doesn't he talk to a PR person? Injured people don't beat other top players by the scores he has been beating them. Plus, I am sure that somebody in Madison Avenue has a metric of how people see him. And, fair or not, he has a public profile, some of which came from the years in which he retired with frequency from tournaments. So, lay low. Say nothing about the injury, play your matches. But it will never look good when somebody claims they are facing a disadvantage and then they plaster a fellow player |1,2 & 4.
And, a hamstring? He should not be able to run, at all.

I barely watched the match, but when I turned it on, there was a point that Rublev should've won, but Djokovic was running down every single ball that would've been winners against almost anyone else, outstretched damn near in a spread eagle split, low to the ground, and I was just like, Novak, really, a hamstring injury? You can't get into splits like that pop up, do it again, do it again, and then keep playing the rest of the match, walk normally, and be ready for the next match and still claim a damn hamstring injury.

I don't care even a little bit that he's going to win this tournament with little resistance in a few days. I doubt many tennis fans do either whether they like him or not, we're used to it, we know he's a great player and he's at his best in Australia. Nothing about this is surprising. I just see no reason whatsoever that he needs to act like he's injured AND keep talking about said injury with the press as if it is an active issue that is hampering him.

It has been absolutely shocking for years that he hasn't gotten a legitimate PR consultant to work on his public image. He wants to be so beloved, it is baffling that he hasn't enlisted outside expert help with it. He wouldn't be great, too much has happened that many can't forget, but he'd definitely improved his image with some fans by now. And we know he hasn't, because he just never gets it right and he would've had some hits alongside the misses if he had bothered to get that help.

by Deuce Personally, I much prefer seeing a person be raw and genuine and sincere - whether the person behaves like an ass or behaves like a wonderful person - than to see a him/her be 'trained' by a 'P.R. person' to create an artificial and phony 'public image' that is far removed from the real person.

by ashkor87 Maybe being misunderstood and vilified is his 'script' ..very hard to break those..

by JTContinental Novak’s team had to be reminded about its policy with flags, etc after his dad was photographed expressing support for Russia with fans wearing the Z symbol

by JazzNU
JTContinental wrote: Thu Jan 26, 2023 8:30 pm Novak’s team had to be reminded about its policy with flags, etc after his dad was photographed expressing support for Russia with fans wearing the Z symbol
I wish I thought there was even a slight chance you might be mistaken. Good lord.

by JTContinental Link to the CNN article

https://www.cnn.com/2023/01/26/tennis/d ... index.html

by JazzNU I found a tweet with the video, I'll post it in Serious Tennis thread as well. Sheesh.

by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 He seems to be as understated as she is: "She has improved her volleys quite a bit".
I saw her hit a FH volley against Ostapenko that was downright Mandlikova-esque. She is quite good up there.

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jan 26, 2023 9:34 pm

I've been exhausted by the victim narrative they've been heaping onto Rybakina.

by Deuce Ironic.

by Owendonovan
JazzNU wrote: Thu Jan 26, 2023 10:19 pm
ti-amie wrote: Thu Jan 26, 2023 9:34 pm

I've been exhausted by the victim narrative they've been heaping onto Rybakina.
I find the tattoo a little red flagish.

by ti-amie This is a day late but...


by ti-amie

by ti-amie




by ti-amie

by ponchi101
ti-amie wrote: Fri Jan 27, 2023 8:25 pm This is a day late but...

Ah, ok. ESPN down here was reporting that the Aussie Open organization did not allow him to go to the match. And I was wondering how they could do that.

by ashkor87 60 % Sabalenka, 40% Rybakina today. What do you think?

by ashkor87 Ryba returns much better than Saba...that could make the difference!

by ashkor87 It will go 3 sets I am sure

by ashkor87 There is the third set!

by ashkor87 I think Rybakina will win now...she has conserved energy better

by ashkor87 Rybakjna too cautious at critical points .that will cost her

by ashkor87 Sabalenka deserves to win, making things happen

by ashkor87 They say these women are hitting 7 mph harder than Tsitsipas..
Who thought Sabalenka would serve more aces than Rybakina?!
A grand slam champion at last! Well deserved !

by ponchi101 ESPN also reported that Sabalenka's FH is being hit with more pace than the men's. A very interesting point.

by ti-amie


by ti-amie




by ti-amie

by ti-amie


by ti-amie

by ti-amie

by ti-amie








by ashkor87 aoyama and shibahara are awesome! I always learn a lot by watching women's doubles- because I can relate to how they play .can't relate to the men at all .can't play the way they play .all 4 at the net!
I love the way Aoyama, in particular knows when to intercept, and they both volley so decisively..unlike Coco and pegula, all they do is block the ball, the first time at least..

by JazzNU

by ti-amie






by ti-amie

by ti-amie








by ponchi101 That was a gorgeous lights display.

by JazzNU

by ponchi101 One more of the very likeable WTA players. :heart:

by ashkor87 repeating an earlier post:

Paraphrasing Gary Lineker, 'two men hit the ball back and forth for 4 hours and Djokovic always wins'.

by ti-amie


Les Alpes @les_Alps
Replying to @MichalSamulski
Tennis has a huge problem with ageing fanbase, too many are stuck with Serena, Roger etc and they can't follow what's happening after their retirement.


WHATisLIFEwithoutART
@samuraichopstix
Replying to
@MichalSamulski
This is why tennis produced the Netflix docu Breakpoint specifically targeted to non tennis or new or younger tennis fans to peak their interest on the NextGen players.



This is for Australian viewership. I think the in person numbers were pretty good.

by ti-amie Australian Open smashes records as grandest of slams
By Cara Waters
January 31, 2023 — 5.00am

KEY POINTS
Attendance at the Australian Open over three weeks was 902,312 with a record 839,192 people attending over the main two weeks of the tournament up from 812,174 in 2020 before the coronavirus pandemic.

It makes the Australian Open by far the biggest of the Grand Slams with Wimbledon achieving a record attendance of 515,164 fans last year, 613,000 at the French Open and 776,000 at the US Open.

Television viewing numbers were down on last year with a cumulative reach of more than 10 million viewers.

https://www.theage.com.au/national/vict ... 5cgfx.html

by ponchi101 Sure. I would have gone if I lived in Melbourne.
But the point about last year Vs this year, in TV viewership, is the important one. And he will most likely be in every final of a tournament he gets in. So...

by ti-amie 50 Australian Open Takeaways: Djokovic's Dominance and Sabalenka's Star Turn
Recapping a bizarre, but memorable, fortnight with a familiar ending.
JON WERTHEIM JAN 29, 2023

Cleaning out the notebook and Notes App from the 2023 Australian Open…

1. Novak Djokovic is your 2023 Australian Open men’s champion, winning the event for the tenth time, and tying Rafael Nadal with his 22nd career major. This event was a testament to his powers of persistence and survival instincts. This title came 15 years after he won for the first time. And, closer to 40 than 30, he remains at the peak of his powers.

2. Aryna Sabalenka is your 2023 Australian Open women’s champion. And, damn, did she earn it. She dropped no sets until the final and managed to save her best performance for last. Sabalenka played unflustered tennis in a three-set insta-classic. We talk plenty about her reconciliation with her serve. But what about her groundstrokes, crossing the net with as much pace as ever, but with more built-in cushion? What an absolute triumph.

3. Is Elena Rybakina the best server in women’s tennis? She reached her second major final in the last three events, taking out the top seed in the process. She brought it for seven matches and was the picture of poise in victory and defeat. No more outer courts.

4. Stefanos Tsitsipas was splendid for six rounds, mixing pace with precision, serving reliably (without having to rely on his serve) and relishing the atmosphere at Melbourne Park. Then he ran into Djokovic in the final. In another era, he is a decorated champion with an aesthetically appealing game. In this era, he must be wondering “What do I have to do to beat this guy?”

5. Tommy Paul entered the tournament one spot out from being seeded. He won’t have to worry about that happening again for a while. He's now a top-20 player. The 25 year-old American reached the semis winning a variety of matches in a variety of ways (out-grinding Alejandro D. Fokina; outpowering Roberto Bautista Agut; out-veteraning Ben Shelton). He didn’t offer Djokovic much resistance in the semis. But, still, what an event for him.

6. A decade removed from her last major title, Victoria Azarenka rolled into the semifinals winning five matches including a victory over No. 3 Jessie Pegula. She then lost to Rybakina. At 33, she may never win another major. But she should take immense pride in her career, her longevity and her transformation from standoffish young star to wise head.

7. A year ago a pair of Aussie wild cards, Nick Kyrgios and Thanasi Kokkinakis won the doubles, forming the spine of the first episode of “Break Point.” Tennis being tennis, the pair couldn’t defend their title….and so it went to another team of Aussie wild cards, Rinky Hijikata (former UNC Tar Heel) and Jason Kubler (former Sacramento resident).

8. Discount double Czech. You thought Djokovic dominates. The Czech team Barbora Krejcikova and Katerina Siniakova took the doubles title, their fourth straight major in events they have entered.

9. Like early 90s Gwen Stefani, Brazil’s Luisa Stefani is accumulating buzz before her inevitable emergence. The 25-year-old drew all sorts of praise among the tennis chattering class as she teamed with countryman Rafael Matos to win the mixed doubles, beating Rohan Bopanna and Sania Mirza in the mixed doubles final.

10. In the boys, Alexander Blockx of Belgium doesn’t just win the surname-looks-like-a-crypto-exchange but wins the title beating Learner Tien of Irvine (and USC) 7-6 in the third set.

11. In the girls final, a battle of Russians, as Alina Korneeva beat Erika Andreeva 7-5 in the third set. Colette Lewis has your results. Of course she does.

12. A great tennis New Year’s resolution for us all, self included: give the wheelchair tennis more attention. It’s a wonderful addition to the sport; the skill level is outrageous; the backstories are as well. The results start here.

13. The revelation of the tournament was, of course, Ben Shleton, the Floridian (with Indiana roots!) who was a college player a year ago and a top 50 player today. So much to like about his game, starting with his lefty forehand; his durability (handling best-of-five just fine) and his likability. This was close to a perfect tournament for him. He answered a lot of questions. He leaves knowing there are still more levels to crack.

14. You can’t spell Rune without “rue.” If you are Holger Rune, do you recall this event for playing to your seeding (No. 9) and your hype and going nine sets before dropping one? Or do you recall this event foremost for squandering a 5-2 fifth-set lead, then two match points, then a 5-0 super-tiebreak lead, in your defeat to Andrey Rublev? The kid—and he is a kid—is 19. He is really good. And will only get better. But what a weird mix of maximal confidence and then tightness when it’s closing time...Same theme, different verse. Sebastian Korda is so very good. A few weeks removed from brandishing a match point against Djokovic (a feat that only grew more impressive as peers struggled to even win games), he beats Medvedev en route to the quarters. There, he retires with a wrist injury. What a mix of pride and disappointment he must be feeling.

Image
Gauff suffered an upset loss in the fourth round, but it still seems only to be a matter of time before she wins her first major.
Mike Frey/USA TODAY

15. Coco Gauff is like ice cream and pizza. If you don’t like her, you’re the problem. But we need to balance (to…New Balance?) out the optimism with a realistic assessment: She is 18. She is progressing beautifully. She is stampeding into the tennis future. Her greatest asset might be her poise. And losing to Jelena Ostapenko in round four…is a loss that ought to sting.

16. A sport resists serious treatment when it has competitions that end after four in the morning. More importantly, late matches have material impacts on the competition. Curfew time.

17. From the credit where-it’s-due department: the USTA takes plenty of incoming slings and arrows, often justifiably. But there are now 10 Americans in the ATP top 50, this at a time when tennis has never been more global. Only one (John Isner) is north of 30. Represented therein: a variety of games, physiques, and paths. Some leaned on the USTA more than others. But the math is the math. This was no fluke. Of the top 12 seeds, five fell to Americans. But the top two Americans both had disappointing events.

18. Lots of complaints about the television coverage, at least in the United States. Bear in mind my obvious conflict—working for a network that would have liked more rights and was, essentially, outbid. But here’s the deal: Tennis doesn’t rate—though we can ask whether that’s an accurate reflection of popularity, or a self-fulfilling prophecy. Spend years and years burying a product and alienating fans and rotting with unchecked conflicts and what do you expect? ESPN saw tennis as a means of goosing digital growth and ESPN+ subscriptions. Fine. It demanded exclusivity as part of its bid—no Amazon or Tennis Channel or other potential competitor in the mix or on the grounds. Fine. Especially coming off years of Covid losses, Tennis Australia simply took the highest bid, collateral damage or creative compromise or alienating fans be damned. ESPN compounded problems by deciding to keep costs down and produce the event out of Bristol.

At some level, this is all just rational actors acting rationally. This a media rights deal; not philanthropy or an exercise in nobility. But this is also tennis being tennis: intransigent, territorial, short-sighted, acting to the detriment of the sport overall. As I wrote last week, most of the blame here falls on Tennis Australia, not ESPN. The obvious solution: the seller puts up some guardrails. “Hey, look, buyer, we’d love for you to cut that check. But we are making some demands. Until streaming grows, there always has to be linear T.V. coverage. We need your team on the ground and not bleary-eyed in Bristol. We’re coming off this bump with Netflix and now we’re squandering that, making the sport so damn hard to find and alienating fans. Help us out here. Your shabby treatment amounts to sports-i-cide. And we can’t have blood on our hands.”

For whatever reasons—underestimation of leverage? laziness? greed? misperception of how minuscule streaming numbers truly are?—that didn’t happen. Tennis Australia got a fat check. But I wonder if Tennis Australia realizes how much they have lost in the process. And how damaging this is to a sport fighting harder than ever for bandwidth, real and metaphorical.

19. It was yet another big event for college tennis, led by Shelton, who was playing No. 2 singles for Florida a year ago and is now a top pro (and a millionaire). And note this announcement from the tours. For a long time 17 year-olds have had a tough choice: go to college and risk slowing or ruining their career or go pro and risk squandering a full-ride and four-year education. As rules have changed; as careers have lengthened; as college competition improves….it’s no longer a dilemma. And credit to Lindsay Davenport for this excellent point: the vibe from college tennis—using the crowd’s energy; accepting underdog status; being an individual while being part of a unit—has never been more important in the pros. When Shelton played Aussie Alexei Popyrin in Melbourne, it must have felt a lot like going to Knoxville or Tallahassee. And he wasn’t cowed.

20. It was a quiet hot stove season in tennis. Not a lot of coaching changes. But note that Donna Vekic took on Pam Shriver…and was among the last five players remaining in the draw. Sometimes correlation doesn’t equal causation. Other times players are rewarded for making outside-the-box hires.

21. The re-up from last week….Yes, sports are, inherently physical. Yes, injuries are part of the proposition. But this many? This early? This varied? Already low on stars, the tournament loses Kyrgios, Carlos Alcaraz, Ajla Tomljanovic, and Paula Badosa before the event—and those are just the Netflix principals—and Nadal by Wednesday. We don’t think twice about images like this. Or that Sebastian Korda can break through and beat top ten players….only to leave with a concerning wrist injury. We don’t realize how much conversation revolves around talk of who’s healthy and who carries what injury into what round. Imagine other sports confronted with this fact pattern and, instead of addressing root causes or investing in solutions, essentially shrugging and saying, “Pity. Good luck with a fast and full recovery. Hope to see you back on tour soon!”

22. Imagine you’re Netflix. You have invested millions in a multi-part tennis series. You launch in Australia. It’s one thing that virtually every cast member had a disappointing event. Hey it’s sports. The unpredictability is part of the ride. But then you have fans in the critical U.S. market unable to find the matches? That stops momentum just like a match against Djokovic. Netflix must be wondering, “Wait, what? What kind of a self-sabotaging sport is this?”

23. If only there were a players association to address issues like injuries and commitments and match time starts….without tours and management agencies that are conflicted. The PTPA announced its Players Executive Committee and here’s hoping the united players voice continues amplifying.

24. Maria Sharapova (ironically or not) raised an excellent point in Break Point: endorsements are not what they used to be. Burned by lavishing millions on players who not only fail to fulfill promise but fizzle precisely because of said lavished millions, brands have grown cautious and scaled back. You see a lot more top players who are not being paid to wear attire. Contracts are studded with performance-based clauses. The wealth is more concentrated than ever. (Suffice to say, Roger Federer’s Rolex deal is not Jack Draper’s Rolex deal.) The good news: there are more varied opportunities than ever for players, and more opportunities to take equity instead of money upfront.

25. The equivalent of a restaurant’s “soft open,” the Aussie Open eased in mid-match, same-side-of-the-court coaching. And…it did not have much material impact, good or bad. Didn’t change outcomes, as feared. Didn’t turn coaches into celebrities, as hoped. One lighter moment: in the quarters, Tommy Paul appealed to his coach, Brad Stine, for advice on where Ben Shelton would serve. Stine made a “T” gesture. Shelton intercepted this intel, served wide, and the two players shared a knowing smile.

26. A big winner from the Australian swing: The United Cup. It ain’t perfect. It needs tweaks. But it leans into tennis’ asset hiding in plain sight: the strength of both the men's and women's games. It enriches the players. (Taylor Fritz and Jessie Pegula—anchors of the winning U.S. team—both earned around $800,000 for the week.) It’s a hell of an improvement from the ATP Cup. And with Davis Cup in the hospital (hospice?), the United Cup has a big opportunity to expand.

27. An acknowledgement of the Ukrainian players, who are playing—and living—under unimaginable conditions. Marta Kostyuk, Anhelina Kalinina, Kateryna Bandl, Dayana Yastremska. That they are winning matches is really quite remarkable. And here’s Chris Clarey on Elina Svitolina. Imagine the dissonance. You are in Australia, staying in luxury accommodations, and loading up on free sushi and playing for life-changing money…while at home, it’s winter and there’s no heat or electricity….and while we’re here: Karen Khachanov signed a camera lens with a message encouraging Armenia in the face of an Azerbaijan incursion. I went down this rabbit hole and, why aren’t we talking about this more?

28. Nick Kyrgios reached the Wimbledon final. At the U.S. Open, he beat the defending champion and recent No.1, Daniil Medvedev. He stars in the first Netflix episode. He is playing his home major. He is the defending doubles champ. And….then withdraws on account of injury. He turns 28 in a few months. You wonder as much if his return hinges on the mental impact as compared to the physical.

29. Mettle > metal. You play two five-setters, spend 10-plus hours on court, and go to sleep after the sun has risen? Andy Murray had precisely the wrong opponent for his third match, the steady Roberto Bautista Agut. But Murray leaves having answered a lot of questions about his durability, his ability, and his desire to continue playing.

30. Jelena Ostapenko took out Coco Gauff and reached the quarters. Ostapenko doesn’t care what you—or opponents— think of her. And this makes her all the more intriguing.

31. Diana Shnaider—the rare player post-Agassi who sent us scrambling for the right spelling of babushka—qualified, won a round and took a set off Maria Sakkari, annoying her in the process. Can she really just go and play college tennis now?

32. Feel like we need some ground rules for talking about retirement:

a) Fan (and media) speculation is okay, even expected. Is Joe Biden going to run for re-election, even though he’ll turn 82 in 2024? Is The Fabelmans Steven Spielberg’s final movie? Is Elton John ever going to tour again? Is this really Phillip Roth’s final book? The chattering class is entitled to speculate about the careers of those in the performing arts, athletes included.

b) It’s not cool to ask an athlete about their retirement plans. It’s an agonizing decision. It’s a person decision. It’s an existential decision. (“Am I ready to walk away and perhaps never be as good at anything again as I am at this sport?”) Athletes will reach and reveal this decision on their own terms. Not because they received a gotcha question at a press conference.

c) It’s deeply uncool for an athlete to join this conversation. When Alexander Zverev speculated that “Rafael Nadal will announce his retirement at Roland Garros,” it was a swerve across the median. And Nadal—who usually goes to great lengths to avoid any confrontation—clearly wasn’t pleased.

d) It’s intolerably uncool to demand, even lobby, that an athlete retire or that they are (cliché alert) “tarnishing a legacy” by continuing. Venus Williams has not won a major in 15 years. Part of her legacy is finding fulfillment and joy and competing into her 40s. That’s not tarnishing, that’s polishing. Especially in an individual sport, when there’s no roster spot being taken and no salary cap being eaten, play as long as you'd like.

33. While we are here….new rule: all defending Wimbledon champs must play on show courts. Who wins when Elena Rybakina is banished to the hinterlands, playing her first week matches in outer Perth? She is humiliated and, rightly, angry. (After the semis, she nodded to Drake and signed a camera: "Started on Court 13, now we're here.") The tournament misses an opportunity to promote a star with major bona fides—who will make an imprint on the event. This court exile has the effect of diminishing Wimbledon and the meaning of a Wimbledon title. Often debates over court assignments are silly—there are a finite number of courts and there are a finite number of slots. But this one is extreme.

34. Can we all agree that a) Russia was—and is— in the wrong in its unprovoked invasion of Ukraine, now nearly a year old…. b) banning Russian players from Wimbledon was not an appropriate/effective show of objection and outrage…. c) withholding ranking points from Wimbledon was not an appropriate/effective retaliation by the tours? Wimbledon got a lot of bad press and bad vibes, not least from the banned players. A lot of deserving players are now ranked lower than they should be because they won rounds but not points. And not much public opinion was swayed. With any luck, the Wimbledon draw is open to all in 2023; and full points are awarded. We can/should protest Russia and Putin in particular. But there are better ways.

While we are here…as it is written: don’t visit the sins of the father on the son. But imagine being Novak Djokovic, clawing back good will from the public with winning tennis and winning public appearances. And then your father is posing with fans wearing Putin's “Z” symbol. We say it again: the tennis is so precise; the public presentation is riddled with unforced errors.

35. Shuffling down the boulevard of broken dreams that is the qualifying draw….As the great Mats Wilander once put it about failing to qualify on Melbourne, “That’s a long way to go not to make a main draw.” Players who didn’t make it included Kristina Mladenovic (former top ten player; whose sometimes doubles partner, Caroline Garcia, is now a top five player); young Czech Linda Noskova (who beat No. 2 Ons Jabeur the first week of the season); and Wimbledon second-week player (but no points earner) Tim van Rijthoven.

36. Weirdest moment of the tournament? Two choices spring to mind: Danielle Collins exuberantly celebrating match point when she won her seventh point (not the tenth) of a tiebreak in the decisive set. Another option: the ballkid who made off with Nadal’s racket midmatch? For the record: a) Collins smiled off her error and, to her great credit, reset admirably after thinking she had won. b) Nadal smiled as well and was careful not to embarrass the kid.

37. Less lightheartedly….We often joke that tennis towels are worth their weight in gold. Note how often players lose (or win), shake hands, and immediately start accumulating the freebie towels to stuff in their bags. Now the fans are getting in the act? Not if superhero James Keothavong has anything to do with it.

38. What a strange year for Daniil Medvedev. He comes within a set of winning the 2022 Australian Open. But then falls to Nadal. He becomes No.1, but it’s the same week Russia invades Ukraine. He undergoes surgery. He’s banned from Wimbledon. He loses to Nick Kyrgios while trying to defend his U.S. Open title. He loses here to Sebastian Korda—without winning a set—and is now outside the top ten.

39. Speaking of Medvedev, I had a chance to speak with him last month in Saudi Arabia. He was lovely. He always is. He was there for an exhibition event with Zverev, Kyrgios, Fritz, Norrie, Thiem, Wawrinka, et al. (Ironically, Michael Mmoh was an alternate.) Meanwhile, Casper Ruud was traipsing around South America, determined to take his proper offseason in February. Never begrudge athletes—especially in individual sports with no guaranteed contracts—the right to make additional money. But note which players took a proper offseason (Sabalenka, Djokovic, Shelton) and which did not. And how the members of each group fared in Australia.

40. Five players who didn’t make it beyond round four but impressed nonetheless: Jerry Shang (who, at 17, qualified and became the first Chinese male to win a main draw match); Daniel Altmeier and his one-handed backhand; Tomas Machac of the Czech Republic—they just keep coming off the assembly line, these young Czech comers. Speaking of: Linda Fruhvirtova’s place in the top ten is such an inevitability. Shall we just place her there now and save time? Katie Volleynets has the game to match the name. The Lafayette, California native took down No.9 Veronika Kudermetova.

41. The extreme heat was only sporadically extreme during this event. But unless the planet begins to reverse itself and cool off—and this trend isn’t heading in the right direction—asking athletes to run around in triple-digit heat is sadistic. Asking fans and officials to watch in those conditions is both dangerous and bad business. We can have stopgap solutions like a heat rule and retractable roofs. But at some point, the rubber (melted as it may be) is going to meet the road. Tennis would do well to have some sort of climate plan. What happens when it is simply impossible to hold January events in Australia; or August events in southern Ohio?

42. Credit Matt Roberts for calling this to our attention. But Ernesto Escobedo came to Australia playing under the American flag…and left under the Mexican flag.

43. Tennis clap to Sam Stosur, a credit-to-the-sport type (and future Hall of Famer?) who played her final event. And same for Sania Mirza, a trailblazer, now 36, who played her final major match….in the mixed doubles final.

44. Davis Cup may be on a respirator. But it still, you know, exists. Such as it is, the United States has a captaincy vacancy to fill. David Nainkin and Dean Goldfine—popular and well-respected, both—will lead the U.S. team in Tashkent next month, but are interim leaders. For the permanent post, James Blake is an obvious choice. And he would be an excellent, unimpeachable pick. The USTA could also do something totally out of character and off-brand and take a risk. For kicks, I throw out the names Brian Billick, Chanda Rubin and Dirk Nowitzki. Brandon Staley next time…

45. Neither Roger Federer nor Serena Williams played the 2023 Australian Open. But this was the first event with both retired. And….missed as they both are, it was scarcely a storyline, their names scarcely mentioned. This is all healthy. Life doesn’t stop. Nor should it.

46. Owing to Covid, the 2020 Olympics was, of course, postponed a year. Which means the Paris 2024 Games are but 18 months or so away. The tennis will be held at Roland Garros. And you wonder to what extent participation will be a benchmark/carrot for various players. If you’re, say, Richard Gasquet or Gael Monfils or even Stan Wawrinka (who grew up a short train ride from Paris) might this factor in your plans?

47. Your periodic reminder: currency markets have a big impact on global enterprises—such as, say, tennis. So the Australian Open can increase prize money three percent. But the Aussie dollar could rise (or fall) in value that amount just within the 14 days of the tournament. (As I write this it’s 70 cents to the dollar and 65 cents to the Euro.

48. Your periodic reminder: the Big Four (plus Serena) are/were extraordinary. We bandy about these statistics….900 weeks in the top 10. Three majors in a year, 44th semifinal. “Hasn’t lost in Australia since 2018.” These are the outliers. Not the other major champions, who flit in and out. The arc of, say Muguruza or Medvedev or Thiem. They are not disappointing or erratic. They are normal. It’s Nadal, Djokovic, Federer, Serena (and Murray) who are the statistical freaks.

49. Thanks for your comments and blandishments re: Tennis Channel. It’s the David Ferrer of networks. Not all the resources and weapons, but a lot of heart and soul and industriousness.

50. Rebranding Margaret Courts Arena “MCA” in hopes of people forgetting that the eponym is a bigot? That’s cowardice. Laura Robson saying this? Courage. She’ll take us out….

If you enjoyed this coverage, give editor @chrisjalmeida a follow. Always fun geeking out on tennis with you guys. Back to the day job. See you in Paris.

https://www.si.com/tennis/2023/01/29/au ... -sabalenka

by ti-amie There is still a lot to fix with Gauff's game. She may make quarters and semis but I don't think she's ready to take a Slam.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 8:50 pm Sure. I would have gone if I lived in Melbourne.
But the point about last year Vs this year, in TV viewership, is the important one. And he will most likely be in every final of a tournament he gets in. So...
I'm not willing to say he'll make every final of a tournament he gets in. To me, that seems highly unlikely. If they were all played in Melbourne? I'd agree.

But in terms of viewership, yes, an issue. I can't recall a single time a non-tennis sports fan has asked me a question about Djokovic that didn't involve a scandal (I definitely had people ask me about the asshole who was yelling at a kid on court - it was the Miami Open and appeared on national news broadcasts here - fun times). Just about every other "big name" from the old guard yes I've been asked about in some form, but not him. I just don't think he moves the needle on his own.

by Deuce
ti-amie wrote: Mon Jan 30, 2023 8:12 pm


Les Alpes @les_Alps
Replying to @MichalSamulski
Tennis has a huge problem with ageing fanbase, too many are stuck with Serena, Roger etc and they can't follow what's happening after their retirement.


WHATisLIFEwithoutART
@samuraichopstix
Replying to
@MichalSamulski
This is why tennis produced the Netflix docu Breakpoint specifically targeted to non tennis or new or younger tennis fans to peak their interest on the NextGen players.



This is for Australian viewership. I think the in person numbers were pretty good.
Yeah - gee - I wonder what was missing this year, as compared to last year. :roll:
Could it possibly be the element of competition?!? And the fact that the only people who can derive something practical and enjoyable from a Djokovic match are insomniacs??
It's incredibly boring to devout tennis fans and casual fans alike to see one player dominating and winning easily. People aren't going to tune in to watch that - except for the aforementioned insomniacs, who would finally be able to get some sleep.

As for 'Break Point' - yes, it will attract people to tennis. It will attract extremely superficial 'fans' who care far more about who is dating who on the tours, and what the players are wearing, than they care about the actual on-court competition.

Many people are saying that the 'fans' that 'Drive to Survive' brought to Formula 1 racing are already ruining the sport. ('Break Point' is made by the same people who made the very superficial and artificially sensationalistic 'Drive to Survive'.)

Unfortunately, as usual, everything is about money, and the ends justifying the means. The powers that be in any professional sport don't give a damn if the fans understand the sport or care about the sport - as long as they spend their money on the sport, that's the ONLY thing that counts to them.

by ponchi101 About TV ratings and viewers.
Roger had a period of domination as strict as what Novak is imposing now. During the 2004-2007 years, he won three of the four slams every year, made the ATP finals every year (won 3) and won 13 MS 1000's.
NOBODY was not tuning in for his matches.

It's got nothing to do with dominance and the predictability of the outcomes (in 2006, Roger went 92-5).

by ti-amie Aryna Sabalenka offers blunt response to Belarus trophy snub after winning Aus Open
Aryna Sabalenka's country was not engraved on her Australian Open trophy after winning the title.
By NEIL MCLEMAN
13:48, Sat, Jan 28, 2023 | UPDATED: 13:48, Sat, Jan 28, 2023

Asked about being the first ever neutral winner of a Major, Sabalenka said: I think everyone still knows that I'm a Belarusian player. That's it. Will this be a big deal in my country:? I think so. I think people will be proud of me. But I think I will go back to Miami. I live there right now.”

Wimbledon are currently deciding whether to readmit players from the two nations this summer.

Image

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/ ... ennis-news

by ponchi101 Neutral winner.
So, is she a citizen of the world? If so, I want to see her passport.
This is silly.

by Deuce
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 4:23 pm About TV ratings and viewers.
Roger had a period of domination as strict as what Novak is imposing now. During the 2004-2007 years, he won three of the four slams every year, made the ATP finals every year (won 3) and won 13 MS 1000's.
NOBODY was not tuning in for his matches.

It's got nothing to do with dominance and the predictability of the outcomes (in 2006, Roger went 92-5).
I suppose that personality and the fluidity and beauty of one's game can be a factor in how many people watch.
But I also believe that if Djokovic were not winning his matches so easily this year, more people would have tuned in to watch the Final.

by JazzNU
ponchi101 wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 4:23 pm About TV ratings and viewers.
Roger had a period of domination as strict as what Novak is imposing now. During the 2004-2007 years, he won three of the four slams every year, made the ATP finals every year (won 3) and won 13 MS 1000's.
NOBODY was not tuning in for his matches.

It's got nothing to do with dominance and the predictability of the outcomes (in 2006, Roger went 92-5).
Yes, and people tuned in to just about every Slam in the 2000s and 2010s expecting to see Serena win and she usually did and that wasn't a deterrent, but an attraction.

Definitely not a dominance problem, but a likability one. It's an issue with no easy solution. One of the ones that they've come up with has his own issues, especially that he can't seem to stay healthy.

by JazzNU
ti-amie wrote: Tue Jan 31, 2023 9:46 pm Aryna Sabalenka offers blunt response to Belarus trophy snub after winning Aus Open
Aryna Sabalenka's country was not engraved on her Australian Open trophy after winning the title.
By NEIL MCLEMAN
13:48, Sat, Jan 28, 2023 | UPDATED: 13:48, Sat, Jan 28, 2023

Asked about being the first ever neutral winner of a Major, Sabalenka said: I think everyone still knows that I'm a Belarusian player. That's it. Will this be a big deal in my country:? I think so. I think people will be proud of me. But I think I will go back to Miami. I live there right now.”

Wimbledon are currently deciding whether to readmit players from the two nations this summer.

Image

https://www.express.co.uk/sport/tennis/ ... ennis-news

What happens when the war ends (hopefully soon)? Does the country name get etched on in the future or does it stay this way? I'm completely unfamiliar with the rules for this.

by ti-amie

by ponchi101 So, what was it? More people in Australia tuned in for the Men's final than for the women's?
The numbers in those charts (if I am reading them correctly) are that they did.

by ti-amie That's how I read it too but he seems to be trying to say different measurements were used to reach the totals.

by ti-amie




Dylan B @dccb31
Replying to @jamesgraysport
It was behind a paywall this year.

by Owendonovan Djokovic and his family manifested an incredible amount of ill will towards him last year in Australia by Australians (and the world in general). Tsitsipas isn't all that well regarded either. If an Australian media company didn't get their money's worth then boo hoo for them. Am I supposed to be feeling one way or another over tv ratings?

by ti-amie This was going to happen especially for the Slam. When matches are starting at 3a on the East Coast of the US during a work week what do they think will happen?

I seem to remember reading a few years ago that this time of year is like spring break for students in Australia. To hold the Slam at any other time would cause attendance issues the reasoning went. I don't know. People are working, even if they're able to work from home in the States, and I wouldn't run around thinking the sky is falling - yet.

by ponchi101
Owendonovan wrote: Sat Feb 04, 2023 12:37 am Djokovic and his family manifested an incredible amount of ill will towards him last year in Australia by Australians (and the world in general). Tsitsipas isn't all that well regarded either. If an Australian media company didn't get their money's worth then boo hoo for them. Am I supposed to be feeling one way or another over tv ratings?
Only that it tells you that the "health" of the sport may not be as rosy as some say.
But we have to wait and see what are the ratings of other tournaments. If the RG final is played without Rafa, and rating are also down, then some people have to start worrying.