Page 387 of 394

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 2:41 pm
by ashkor87
Now Andreeva says her team decided that they didnt need to go to Japan, there was no issue with visas etc.. just a mistake they made, she admits.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 03, 2025 4:13 pm
by ponchi101
ashkor87 wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 2:41 pm Now Andreeva says her team decided that they didnt need to go to Japan, there was no issue with visas etc.. just a mistake they made, she admits.
There you go. As I said, it is not as if Japan is some third world country.
About Coco. It has to be surprising that she hits 17 DF's, against a player of Pegula's caliber, and she still loses in three. That is how good the rest of her game is.
I keep asking: why can't that be fixed by her coaches? Zverev fixed it. Sabalenka fixed. Why can't this team fix it?
Just spend several matches hitting only second serves.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 4:52 am
by 3mlm
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 4:13 pm
About Coco. It has to be surprising that she hits 17 DF's, against a player of Pegula's caliber, and she still loses in three. That is how good the rest of her game is.
I keep asking: why can't that be fixed by her coaches? Zverev fixed it. Sabalenka fixed. Why can't this team fix it?
Just spend several matches hitting only second serves.
That's just it: "Zverev fixed it. Sabalenka fixed it," not their coaches, not their teams. I agree with hitting only second serves; she needs practice at that.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 5:22 am
by ashkor87
I heard Gavin saying (on Roddick's podcast) that the main thing he is working with Coco on is a reliable spun serve she can trust.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2025 3:38 pm
by ponchi101
3mlm wrote: Wed Nov 05, 2025 4:52 am
ponchi101 wrote: Mon Nov 03, 2025 4:13 pm
About Coco. It has to be surprising that she hits 17 DF's, against a player of Pegula's caliber, and she still loses in three. That is how good the rest of her game is.
I keep asking: why can't that be fixed by her coaches? Zverev fixed it. Sabalenka fixed. Why can't this team fix it?
Just spend several matches hitting only second serves.
That's just it: "Zverev fixed it. Sabalenka fixed it," not their coaches, not their teams. I agree with hitting only second serves; she needs practice at that.
Sabalenka made it clear that her coach told her it was bad mechanics; he had her switch her grip and motion. So a little credit to the team is not undue.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2025 7:47 pm
by JTContinental
Venus has accepted a wild card in Auckland--it will be her 33rd season on the tour.

She is also the oldest player to currently have a ranking on tour by 5 years.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2025 7:50 pm
by JTContinental
Sorry, double post

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 12:58 am
by ti-amie

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2025 1:05 am
by ti-amie

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 3:48 am
by ti-amie

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Sun Nov 09, 2025 1:22 pm
by Fastbackss
Wow. That is amazing.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 1:58 am
by ti-amie

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 3:05 am
by ponchi101
I like the chair umpire.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 12:19 pm
by mick1303
The long term absence of dominant players in WTA is confirmed by the fact that in 10 last editions of ATP YEC there were 5 (50%) cases when the winner went undefeated. In the 10 last editions of WTA YEC only 3 times the winner went undefeated - Svitolina, Swiatek and Rybakina. There were also 2 occasions when the winner lost 2 (two!!) matches in the Round Robin stage - Radwanska and Cibulkova. If I'm not mistaken this never happened on ATP side.

Re: Tennis Random, Random (On Court)

Posted: Mon Nov 10, 2025 2:51 pm
by ptmcmahon
Statistically, 5/10 vs 3/10 isn't really a big enough sample to be damning, although the second point is interesting.